通过知识的信念:克涅贝尔的主动分析与斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基体系的关系

IF 0.2 0 THEATER
S. Carnicke
{"title":"通过知识的信念:克涅贝尔的主动分析与斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基体系的关系","authors":"S. Carnicke","doi":"10.1080/20567790.2023.2196284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stanislavsky placed belief in imagined circumstances at the heart of his acting System. As he wrote, “Everything on stage must instill belief in the possibility that it could exist in life as actual feelings and sensations, analogous to those that the artist undergoes while creating.” However, leading proponents of Stanislavsky’s late work rarely mention belief when they write about his last rehearsal technique, named Active Analysis by Maria Knebel. My essay interrogates this puzzling absence through Knebel’s practice, which still positions belief as “the foundation of foundations” in acting, but also sees belief as originating from actors’ active exploration of their roles’ circumstances. For Knebel, there can be no belief in fictional possibilities without the visceral knowledge, acquired through the rehearsal process.","PeriodicalId":40821,"journal":{"name":"Stanislavski Studies","volume":"91 1","pages":"19 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belief through Knowledge: The Relationship of Knebel’s Active Analysis to Stanislavsky’s System\",\"authors\":\"S. Carnicke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20567790.2023.2196284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stanislavsky placed belief in imagined circumstances at the heart of his acting System. As he wrote, “Everything on stage must instill belief in the possibility that it could exist in life as actual feelings and sensations, analogous to those that the artist undergoes while creating.” However, leading proponents of Stanislavsky’s late work rarely mention belief when they write about his last rehearsal technique, named Active Analysis by Maria Knebel. My essay interrogates this puzzling absence through Knebel’s practice, which still positions belief as “the foundation of foundations” in acting, but also sees belief as originating from actors’ active exploration of their roles’ circumstances. For Knebel, there can be no belief in fictional possibilities without the visceral knowledge, acquired through the rehearsal process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stanislavski Studies\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stanislavski Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2023.2196284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanislavski Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2023.2196284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基将对想象情境的信念置于他的表演体系的核心。正如他所写的,“舞台上的一切都必须灌输一种信念,即它可能作为真实的感情和感觉存在于生活中,就像艺术家在创作时所经历的那样。”然而,斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基晚期作品的主要支持者在写他最后的排练技巧时很少提到信仰,这是玛丽亚·克内贝尔的主动分析。我的文章通过Knebel的实践来探究这种令人困惑的缺失,他仍然将信仰定位为表演中的“基础之基础”,但也认为信仰源于演员对角色环境的积极探索。对于Knebel来说,如果没有通过排练过程获得的本能知识,就不可能相信虚构的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Belief through Knowledge: The Relationship of Knebel’s Active Analysis to Stanislavsky’s System
ABSTRACT Stanislavsky placed belief in imagined circumstances at the heart of his acting System. As he wrote, “Everything on stage must instill belief in the possibility that it could exist in life as actual feelings and sensations, analogous to those that the artist undergoes while creating.” However, leading proponents of Stanislavsky’s late work rarely mention belief when they write about his last rehearsal technique, named Active Analysis by Maria Knebel. My essay interrogates this puzzling absence through Knebel’s practice, which still positions belief as “the foundation of foundations” in acting, but also sees belief as originating from actors’ active exploration of their roles’ circumstances. For Knebel, there can be no belief in fictional possibilities without the visceral knowledge, acquired through the rehearsal process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信