基于结果的报告对个人捐赠行为影响的实验研究——是否有回报?

Lena Wörrlein, Marius Mews
{"title":"基于结果的报告对个人捐赠行为影响的实验研究——是否有回报?","authors":"Lena Wörrlein, Marius Mews","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3061026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations aiming for a social goal often report on their work performed and not on actual results. However, results provide better information, because it contains information concerning the changes that occur within the target groups’ environment (outcome) and/or the whole community (impact) as a result of the work performed (output). This study empirically investigates, whether an increasing level of results-based information affects the donor’s willingness to donate and the amount of donations. The authors deploy an online experiment to test the effect in a within-subjects design and a between-subjects design. It is found that the willingness to donate and the amount significantly increase with the level of results for the within-subjects design. Surprisingly, in the between-subjects design this is not the case. It is concluded that donors change their willingness to donate and appreciate higher results levels, only if they got to see and to compare all three levels.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experimental Study on Effects of Results-Based Reporting on Individual Giving Behavior – Does It Pay Off?\",\"authors\":\"Lena Wörrlein, Marius Mews\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3061026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations aiming for a social goal often report on their work performed and not on actual results. However, results provide better information, because it contains information concerning the changes that occur within the target groups’ environment (outcome) and/or the whole community (impact) as a result of the work performed (output). This study empirically investigates, whether an increasing level of results-based information affects the donor’s willingness to donate and the amount of donations. The authors deploy an online experiment to test the effect in a within-subjects design and a between-subjects design. It is found that the willingness to donate and the amount significantly increase with the level of results for the within-subjects design. Surprisingly, in the between-subjects design this is not the case. It is concluded that donors change their willingness to donate and appreciate higher results levels, only if they got to see and to compare all three levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Social Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3061026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3061026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以社会目标为目标的组织经常报告他们的工作执行情况,而不是实际结果。然而,结果提供了更好的信息,因为它包含了关于目标群体的环境(结果)和/或整个社区(影响)作为所执行工作的结果(输出)所发生的变化的信息。本研究通过实证研究,探讨了基于结果的信息水平的提高是否会影响捐赠者的捐赠意愿和捐赠数量。作者利用在线实验来测试受试者内部设计和受试者之间设计的效果。研究发现,在受试者内部设计的结果水平下,捐赠意愿和金额显著增加。令人惊讶的是,在受试者之间的设计中,情况并非如此。结论是,只有当捐赠者看到并比较所有三个级别时,他们才会改变捐赠意愿,并欣赏更高的结果水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Experimental Study on Effects of Results-Based Reporting on Individual Giving Behavior – Does It Pay Off?
Organizations aiming for a social goal often report on their work performed and not on actual results. However, results provide better information, because it contains information concerning the changes that occur within the target groups’ environment (outcome) and/or the whole community (impact) as a result of the work performed (output). This study empirically investigates, whether an increasing level of results-based information affects the donor’s willingness to donate and the amount of donations. The authors deploy an online experiment to test the effect in a within-subjects design and a between-subjects design. It is found that the willingness to donate and the amount significantly increase with the level of results for the within-subjects design. Surprisingly, in the between-subjects design this is not the case. It is concluded that donors change their willingness to donate and appreciate higher results levels, only if they got to see and to compare all three levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信