重新审视传统,重建身份?阿非利卡民族主义与南非的政治转型

W. Munro
{"title":"重新审视传统,重建身份?阿非利卡民族主义与南非的政治转型","authors":"W. Munro","doi":"10.1080/02589349508705020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recent theories of democratic consolidation stress the importance of elite accommodation between contending groups; thus they emphasise group cohesion and solidarity. However, the process of transition itself involves political schisms within authoritarian groups which complicate group identification for institutionalising groupbased politics. This is shown in the case of Afrikaner nationalism. Intensifying tensions in the 1980s between a race‐based nationalist ideology, its institutional vehicle (the National Party) and its raison d'etre (control of state power) show how political shifts came to be interpreted as cultural betrayal, forcing a split in the cultural politics of the group. These schisms assailed core cultural traditions of the group, destabilising the bonds of group cohesion. They have not been resolved, and the group's political identity remains a focus ofintra‐group contestation. Against this background, it is difficult to design appropriate institutions for mediation based on gro...","PeriodicalId":81644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"5-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting tradition, reconstructing identity? Afrikaner nationalism and political transition in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"W. Munro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589349508705020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Recent theories of democratic consolidation stress the importance of elite accommodation between contending groups; thus they emphasise group cohesion and solidarity. However, the process of transition itself involves political schisms within authoritarian groups which complicate group identification for institutionalising groupbased politics. This is shown in the case of Afrikaner nationalism. Intensifying tensions in the 1980s between a race‐based nationalist ideology, its institutional vehicle (the National Party) and its raison d'etre (control of state power) show how political shifts came to be interpreted as cultural betrayal, forcing a split in the cultural politics of the group. These schisms assailed core cultural traditions of the group, destabilising the bonds of group cohesion. They have not been resolved, and the group's political identity remains a focus ofintra‐group contestation. Against this background, it is difficult to design appropriate institutions for mediation based on gro...\",\"PeriodicalId\":81644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commonwealth political studies\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"5-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commonwealth political studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349508705020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349508705020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

最近的民主巩固理论强调了竞争群体之间精英和解的重要性;因此,他们强调群体凝聚力和团结。然而,转型过程本身涉及威权集团内部的政治分裂,这使得群体认同对于制度化群体政治来说变得复杂。这一点在阿非利卡民族主义中得到了体现。20世纪80年代,以种族为基础的民族主义意识形态、它的制度载体(国民党)和它的存在理由(控制国家权力)之间的紧张关系日益加剧,这表明政治转变如何被解释为文化背叛,迫使该群体的文化政治分裂。这些分裂攻击了群体的核心文化传统,破坏了群体凝聚力的纽带。这些问题尚未得到解决,该集团的政治身份仍然是集团内部争论的焦点。在这样的背景下,很难设计出合适的调解制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting tradition, reconstructing identity? Afrikaner nationalism and political transition in South Africa
ABSTRACT Recent theories of democratic consolidation stress the importance of elite accommodation between contending groups; thus they emphasise group cohesion and solidarity. However, the process of transition itself involves political schisms within authoritarian groups which complicate group identification for institutionalising groupbased politics. This is shown in the case of Afrikaner nationalism. Intensifying tensions in the 1980s between a race‐based nationalist ideology, its institutional vehicle (the National Party) and its raison d'etre (control of state power) show how political shifts came to be interpreted as cultural betrayal, forcing a split in the cultural politics of the group. These schisms assailed core cultural traditions of the group, destabilising the bonds of group cohesion. They have not been resolved, and the group's political identity remains a focus ofintra‐group contestation. Against this background, it is difficult to design appropriate institutions for mediation based on gro...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信