{"title":"巴希尔达尔大学学生冲突原因及冲突解决方式","authors":"Dawit Mekonnen Mihiretie, Y. Endawoke","doi":"10.4314/EJDR.V29I1.38643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the causes of conflict and conflict resolution styles among university students. The participants were 390 (49 female and 341 male) sophomore (87.7%), junior (5.6%), and senior (6.7%) university students. Students identified themselves as Amhara, Oromo, Tigre, and as belonging to other ethnic groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicated that the major sources of conflict were ethnicity, religious diversity, defying rules, and sexual and love affairs, in that order. Students reported that the major conflict resolution styles were compromise, avoiding, third-party mediation, and dominating. Results from quantitative analysis, on other hand, showed that integration, compromise, and obliging were the most frequently used styles of conflict resolution. ANOVA showed that sex differences were found in dominating in favour of males. Ethnic differences were observed in integration and dominating, the Oromo tending to use more of integration than Amhara and Tigre, dominating being used by Amhara and Tigre. Amhara and Tigre students use dominating more recurrently than Oromo and other groups. Discussions on major findings and implications for preventive interventions are included. Ethiopian Journal of Development Research Vol. 29 (1) 2007: pp. 35-70","PeriodicalId":84691,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian journal of development research","volume":"6 4 1","pages":"35-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causes of Conflict and Conflict Resolution Styles among Bahir Dar University Students\",\"authors\":\"Dawit Mekonnen Mihiretie, Y. Endawoke\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/EJDR.V29I1.38643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the causes of conflict and conflict resolution styles among university students. The participants were 390 (49 female and 341 male) sophomore (87.7%), junior (5.6%), and senior (6.7%) university students. Students identified themselves as Amhara, Oromo, Tigre, and as belonging to other ethnic groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicated that the major sources of conflict were ethnicity, religious diversity, defying rules, and sexual and love affairs, in that order. Students reported that the major conflict resolution styles were compromise, avoiding, third-party mediation, and dominating. Results from quantitative analysis, on other hand, showed that integration, compromise, and obliging were the most frequently used styles of conflict resolution. ANOVA showed that sex differences were found in dominating in favour of males. Ethnic differences were observed in integration and dominating, the Oromo tending to use more of integration than Amhara and Tigre, dominating being used by Amhara and Tigre. Amhara and Tigre students use dominating more recurrently than Oromo and other groups. Discussions on major findings and implications for preventive interventions are included. Ethiopian Journal of Development Research Vol. 29 (1) 2007: pp. 35-70\",\"PeriodicalId\":84691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian journal of development research\",\"volume\":\"6 4 1\",\"pages\":\"35-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian journal of development research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/EJDR.V29I1.38643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian journal of development research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EJDR.V29I1.38643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本研究探讨大学生冲突的成因及解决冲突的方式。参与者为390名(女性49人,男性341人)大二(87.7%)、大三(5.6%)和大四(6.7%)的大学生。学生们认为自己是阿姆哈拉人、奥罗莫人、提格雷人,以及属于其他民族。定性分析的结果表明,冲突的主要来源依次是种族、宗教多样性、违反规则以及性和爱情。学生报告说,主要的冲突解决方式是妥协、回避、第三方调解和支配。另一方面,定量分析的结果显示,整合、妥协和顺从是最常用的冲突解决方式。方差分析显示,在雄性占优势方面存在性别差异。在融合和支配方面存在种族差异,奥罗莫人比阿姆哈拉人和虎格雷人更倾向于使用融合,阿姆哈拉人和虎格雷人使用支配。阿姆哈拉和Tigre学生比奥罗莫和其他群体更频繁地使用支配。讨论了主要发现和对预防性干预措施的影响。中国发展研究Vol. 29 (1) 2007: pp. 35-70
Causes of Conflict and Conflict Resolution Styles among Bahir Dar University Students
This study examined the causes of conflict and conflict resolution styles among university students. The participants were 390 (49 female and 341 male) sophomore (87.7%), junior (5.6%), and senior (6.7%) university students. Students identified themselves as Amhara, Oromo, Tigre, and as belonging to other ethnic groups. Results from qualitative analysis indicated that the major sources of conflict were ethnicity, religious diversity, defying rules, and sexual and love affairs, in that order. Students reported that the major conflict resolution styles were compromise, avoiding, third-party mediation, and dominating. Results from quantitative analysis, on other hand, showed that integration, compromise, and obliging were the most frequently used styles of conflict resolution. ANOVA showed that sex differences were found in dominating in favour of males. Ethnic differences were observed in integration and dominating, the Oromo tending to use more of integration than Amhara and Tigre, dominating being used by Amhara and Tigre. Amhara and Tigre students use dominating more recurrently than Oromo and other groups. Discussions on major findings and implications for preventive interventions are included. Ethiopian Journal of Development Research Vol. 29 (1) 2007: pp. 35-70