寻找导火索:以俄语指称进化的不同方面为例的文学和非文学文本

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Budennaya
{"title":"寻找导火索:以俄语指称进化的不同方面为例的文学和非文学文本","authors":"E. Budennaya","doi":"10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the diachronic path of Russian pronoun expansion, which affected the period of the 11th–17th centuries: paki li O pro soromit O pro sebe svobodna > jesli on osramit — ona svobodna ‘if he rapes [the slave], she is freed’ (the treaty of 1191–1192 between Novgorod, Gotland, and the German Cities, and its modern translation). The initial trigger of this phenomenon is often attributed to the realm of the third person since the third-person auxiliary was lost first and the third-person subject pronoun massively expanded earlier than the first- and second-person subject pronouns. Nevertheless, one cannot argue that the latter was caused by the former, since the new subject pronouns did not only replace the old auxiliary forms but were also detected in finite verbal clauses where no auxiliaries were ever used. To explore what exactly caused the expansion of pronouns and how this expansion took place in different types of clauses, a diachronic analysis of finite clauses with reduced subject reference was conducted, with a special focus on the type of the predicate. Within the analysis, the referential data of three different Old Russian registers—informal, official and literary—were examined and compared to each other. The results support the hypothesis of copula drop as a trigger for the expansion of pronouns and demonstrate that several intermediate stages of this process can be detected in official and literary texts, where the course of evolution was slower. Thus, only official texts allow us to discover the earlier stage of new referential pronouns substituting former verbal copulas, and only in literary works can we find the transitional elliptical pattern without pronouns or copulas, which existed before the new pronominal pattern. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11","PeriodicalId":42189,"journal":{"name":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"210-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of the Trigger: Literary and Non-literary Texts as Examples of Different Aspects of Russian Referential Evolution\",\"authors\":\"E. Budennaya\",\"doi\":\"10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the diachronic path of Russian pronoun expansion, which affected the period of the 11th–17th centuries: paki li O pro soromit O pro sebe svobodna > jesli on osramit — ona svobodna ‘if he rapes [the slave], she is freed’ (the treaty of 1191–1192 between Novgorod, Gotland, and the German Cities, and its modern translation). The initial trigger of this phenomenon is often attributed to the realm of the third person since the third-person auxiliary was lost first and the third-person subject pronoun massively expanded earlier than the first- and second-person subject pronouns. Nevertheless, one cannot argue that the latter was caused by the former, since the new subject pronouns did not only replace the old auxiliary forms but were also detected in finite verbal clauses where no auxiliaries were ever used. To explore what exactly caused the expansion of pronouns and how this expansion took place in different types of clauses, a diachronic analysis of finite clauses with reduced subject reference was conducted, with a special focus on the type of the predicate. Within the analysis, the referential data of three different Old Russian registers—informal, official and literary—were examined and compared to each other. The results support the hypothesis of copula drop as a trigger for the expansion of pronouns and demonstrate that several intermediate stages of this process can be detected in official and literary texts, where the course of evolution was slower. Thus, only official texts allow us to discover the earlier stage of new referential pronouns substituting former verbal copulas, and only in literary works can we find the transitional elliptical pattern without pronouns or copulas, which existed before the new pronominal pattern. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11\",\"PeriodicalId\":42189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"210-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论了俄语代词扩张的历时路径,它影响了11 - 17世纪的时期:paki li O pro soromit O pro sebe svobodna > jesli on osramit - ona svobodna“如果他强奸了[奴隶],她就被释放了”(1191-1192年诺夫哥罗德、哥特兰和德国城市之间的条约及其现代翻译)。这一现象的最初触发因素通常归因于第三人称领域,因为第三人称助动词首先消失,第三人称主语代词比第一人称和第二人称主语代词更早扩展。然而,我们不能说后者是由前者引起的,因为新的主语代词不仅取代了旧的助词形式,而且在没有使用助词的有限动词从句中也可以发现。为了探究究竟是什么原因导致了代词的扩张,以及这种扩张是如何在不同类型的从句中发生的,我们对主语指代减少的有限从句进行了历时分析,特别关注了谓语的类型。在分析中,三个不同的古俄罗斯登记册的参考数据——非正式的,官方的和文学的——被检查并相互比较。研究结果支持了连词下降是代词扩展的触发因素的假设,并表明在官方和文学文本中可以发现这一过程的几个中间阶段,其中进化过程较慢。因此,只有在官方文本中,我们才能发现新指称代词取代旧动词性连词的早期阶段,只有在文学作品中,我们才能发现在新代词模式出现之前就存在的没有代词和连词的过渡省略模式。2305 - 6754.2020.9.2.11 DOI: 10.31168 /
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Search of the Trigger: Literary and Non-literary Texts as Examples of Different Aspects of Russian Referential Evolution
The article deals with the diachronic path of Russian pronoun expansion, which affected the period of the 11th–17th centuries: paki li O pro soromit O pro sebe svobodna > jesli on osramit — ona svobodna ‘if he rapes [the slave], she is freed’ (the treaty of 1191–1192 between Novgorod, Gotland, and the German Cities, and its modern translation). The initial trigger of this phenomenon is often attributed to the realm of the third person since the third-person auxiliary was lost first and the third-person subject pronoun massively expanded earlier than the first- and second-person subject pronouns. Nevertheless, one cannot argue that the latter was caused by the former, since the new subject pronouns did not only replace the old auxiliary forms but were also detected in finite verbal clauses where no auxiliaries were ever used. To explore what exactly caused the expansion of pronouns and how this expansion took place in different types of clauses, a diachronic analysis of finite clauses with reduced subject reference was conducted, with a special focus on the type of the predicate. Within the analysis, the referential data of three different Old Russian registers—informal, official and literary—were examined and compared to each other. The results support the hypothesis of copula drop as a trigger for the expansion of pronouns and demonstrate that several intermediate stages of this process can be detected in official and literary texts, where the course of evolution was slower. Thus, only official texts allow us to discover the earlier stage of new referential pronouns substituting former verbal copulas, and only in literary works can we find the transitional elliptical pattern without pronouns or copulas, which existed before the new pronominal pattern. DOI: 10.31168/2305-6754.2020.9.2.11
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies
Slovene-International Journal of Slavic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is a periodical focusing on the fields of the arts and humanities. In accordance with the standards of humanities periodicals aimed at the development of national philological traditions in a broad cultural and academic context, the Journal Slověne = Словѣне is multilingual but with a focus on papers in English. The Journal Slověne = Словѣне is intended for the exchange of information between Russian scholars and leading universities and research centers throughout the world and for their further professional integration into the international academic community through a shared focus on Slavic studies. The target audience of the journal is Slavic philologists and scholars in related disciplines (historians, cultural anthropologists, sociologists, specialists in comparative and religious studies, etc.) and related fields (Byzantinists, Germanists, Hebraists, Turkologists, Finno-Ugrists, etc.). The periodical has a pronounced interdisciplinary character and publishes papers from the widest linguistic, philological, and historico-cultural range: there are studies of linguistic typology, pragmalinguistics, computer and applied linguistics, etymology, onomastics, epigraphy, ethnolinguistics, dialectology, folkloristics, Biblical studies, history of science, palaeoslavistics, history of Slavic literatures, Slavs in the context of foreign languages, non-Slavic languages and dialects in the Slavic context, and historical linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信