批评话语分析:学者在研究文章创作中所呈现的知识力量

T. Wardani, S. Setiawan, P. Retnaningdyah
{"title":"批评话语分析:学者在研究文章创作中所呈现的知识力量","authors":"T. Wardani, S. Setiawan, P. Retnaningdyah","doi":"10.31539/LEEA.V4I1.1367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed to analyse the background study on research article and put the argumentation based on the theory about critical discourse analysis related to social cognition theory. Furthermore, the researcher wanted to compare 2 article in critical discourse analysis approach. This method on this study is descriptive qualitative which is presented in the positivist views. Then the result was generalized in the relation on finding and discussion with the theory. In summary, the result showed the different ways in giving the power of the argumentation and explanation between RA1 and RA2. In conclusion, the power of argument used will lead the reader to ignore or accept on how it is become valid statement or not. \nKeywords: Social Cognition, Critical Discourse Analysis, Background Study","PeriodicalId":33052,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Discourse Analysis: The Knowledge Power Presented by Scholar in Creating Research Article\",\"authors\":\"T. Wardani, S. Setiawan, P. Retnaningdyah\",\"doi\":\"10.31539/LEEA.V4I1.1367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was aimed to analyse the background study on research article and put the argumentation based on the theory about critical discourse analysis related to social cognition theory. Furthermore, the researcher wanted to compare 2 article in critical discourse analysis approach. This method on this study is descriptive qualitative which is presented in the positivist views. Then the result was generalized in the relation on finding and discussion with the theory. In summary, the result showed the different ways in giving the power of the argumentation and explanation between RA1 and RA2. In conclusion, the power of argument used will lead the reader to ignore or accept on how it is become valid statement or not. \\nKeywords: Social Cognition, Critical Discourse Analysis, Background Study\",\"PeriodicalId\":33052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31539/LEEA.V4I1.1367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic English Education and Art LEEA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/LEEA.V4I1.1367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在分析研究文章的背景研究,并基于与社会认知理论相关的批判性话语分析理论进行论证。此外,研究者想比较两篇文章在批评话语分析方法。本研究的方法是描述性定性的,这是实证主义观点中提出的。然后在发现和讨论的关系上对结果进行了推广。综上所述,结果显示了RA1和RA2在赋予论证和解释能力方面的不同方式。总之,论证的力量会导致读者忽略或接受它如何成为有效的陈述或不。关键词:社会认知,批评话语分析,背景研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Discourse Analysis: The Knowledge Power Presented by Scholar in Creating Research Article
This study was aimed to analyse the background study on research article and put the argumentation based on the theory about critical discourse analysis related to social cognition theory. Furthermore, the researcher wanted to compare 2 article in critical discourse analysis approach. This method on this study is descriptive qualitative which is presented in the positivist views. Then the result was generalized in the relation on finding and discussion with the theory. In summary, the result showed the different ways in giving the power of the argumentation and explanation between RA1 and RA2. In conclusion, the power of argument used will lead the reader to ignore or accept on how it is become valid statement or not. Keywords: Social Cognition, Critical Discourse Analysis, Background Study
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信