应对地方层面的敲诈勒索:16世纪兹德拉维科恩(德拉维斯科斯,斯特雷蒙地区)的希兰达尔的梅托奇翁案例

Aleksandar Fotić
{"title":"应对地方层面的敲诈勒索:16世纪兹德拉维科恩(德拉维斯科斯,斯特雷蒙地区)的希兰达尔的梅托奇翁案例","authors":"Aleksandar Fotić","doi":"10.2298/balc1950073f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Ottoman Empire extortion on a local level was a frequent practice and it took diverse forms. The Ottoman documents preserved in the archive of the Monastery of Hilandar (Mount Athos) give us a picture of the ways in which its monks struggled to preserve their privileges and protect their large metochion at Zdravikion (about 700 donums). Their basic tax obligation to the ?master of the land? (sahib-i arz) was paid annually in a lump sum (maktu?) ever since 1481, when sultan Bayezid II exempted them from paying the tithe at the express request of the Wallachian voivode Basarab II ?epelu?. The annual lump sum of 600 akces accounted for only a half of the total tax burden - they had been relieved of paying the other half by the sultan himself. This privilege was confirmed by all subsequent sultans, most likely until 1569. Local masters of the land (at first sipahis, then hass and finally vak?f authorities) persistently and in various ways sought to impose the payment of the tithe. This paper presents different arguments they used in the attempt to extort the payment of the tithe and the monks? firm attitude in defending their rights before the kad??s court and the Imperial Divan. Monks were able to prove their rights because they conscientiously kept, sometimes for centuries, all the necessary documents relating to their land possessions, producing them as evidence in court proceedings.","PeriodicalId":80613,"journal":{"name":"Balcanica (Rome, Italy)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coping with extortion on a local level: The case of Hilandar’s Metochion in Zdravikion (Draviskos, Strymon region) in the sixteenth century\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandar Fotić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/balc1950073f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Ottoman Empire extortion on a local level was a frequent practice and it took diverse forms. The Ottoman documents preserved in the archive of the Monastery of Hilandar (Mount Athos) give us a picture of the ways in which its monks struggled to preserve their privileges and protect their large metochion at Zdravikion (about 700 donums). Their basic tax obligation to the ?master of the land? (sahib-i arz) was paid annually in a lump sum (maktu?) ever since 1481, when sultan Bayezid II exempted them from paying the tithe at the express request of the Wallachian voivode Basarab II ?epelu?. The annual lump sum of 600 akces accounted for only a half of the total tax burden - they had been relieved of paying the other half by the sultan himself. This privilege was confirmed by all subsequent sultans, most likely until 1569. Local masters of the land (at first sipahis, then hass and finally vak?f authorities) persistently and in various ways sought to impose the payment of the tithe. This paper presents different arguments they used in the attempt to extort the payment of the tithe and the monks? firm attitude in defending their rights before the kad??s court and the Imperial Divan. Monks were able to prove their rights because they conscientiously kept, sometimes for centuries, all the necessary documents relating to their land possessions, producing them as evidence in court proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Balcanica (Rome, Italy)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Balcanica (Rome, Italy)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/balc1950073f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balcanica (Rome, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/balc1950073f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在奥斯曼帝国,地方层面的敲诈勒索是一种常见的做法,形式多样。保存在希兰达尔修道院(Athos山)档案馆的奥斯曼文献向我们展示了僧侣们如何努力维护他们的特权,并保护他们在Zdravikion的大型metochion(约700 donum)。他们对土地主人的基本纳税义务?自1481年苏丹巴耶济德二世应瓦拉几亚省省长巴萨拉伯二世的明确要求免除他们支付什一税以来,(sahib-i arz)每年一次性支付(maktu?)每年一次性支付的600阿克塞只占全部税负的一半-苏丹本人免除了他们支付另一半的责任。这一特权得到了后来所有苏丹的确认,很可能直到1569年。当地的土地主人(起初是sipahis,然后是hass,最后是vak?(当局)坚持不懈地以各种方式强迫缴纳什一税。本文提出了他们在试图勒索什一税和僧侣时所使用的不同论点。在法庭面前捍卫自己权利的坚定态度?他的宫廷和皇家宫殿。僧侣们能够证明自己的权利,因为他们认真地保存着所有与他们的土地财产有关的必要文件,有时长达几个世纪,并在法庭诉讼中作为证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coping with extortion on a local level: The case of Hilandar’s Metochion in Zdravikion (Draviskos, Strymon region) in the sixteenth century
In the Ottoman Empire extortion on a local level was a frequent practice and it took diverse forms. The Ottoman documents preserved in the archive of the Monastery of Hilandar (Mount Athos) give us a picture of the ways in which its monks struggled to preserve their privileges and protect their large metochion at Zdravikion (about 700 donums). Their basic tax obligation to the ?master of the land? (sahib-i arz) was paid annually in a lump sum (maktu?) ever since 1481, when sultan Bayezid II exempted them from paying the tithe at the express request of the Wallachian voivode Basarab II ?epelu?. The annual lump sum of 600 akces accounted for only a half of the total tax burden - they had been relieved of paying the other half by the sultan himself. This privilege was confirmed by all subsequent sultans, most likely until 1569. Local masters of the land (at first sipahis, then hass and finally vak?f authorities) persistently and in various ways sought to impose the payment of the tithe. This paper presents different arguments they used in the attempt to extort the payment of the tithe and the monks? firm attitude in defending their rights before the kad??s court and the Imperial Divan. Monks were able to prove their rights because they conscientiously kept, sometimes for centuries, all the necessary documents relating to their land possessions, producing them as evidence in court proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信