CSA:无事生非?

IF 0.8 4区 化学 Q4 SPECTROSCOPY
R. Mcdowall
{"title":"CSA:无事生非?","authors":"R. Mcdowall","doi":"10.56530/spectroscopy.hm6969t6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computerized system validation (CSV) in good practice (GxP)-regulated laboratories is alleged to take ages and generate piles of paper to keep inspectors and auditors quiet. To the rescue is the draft FDA guidance on computer software assurance (CSA). But...is this really the case?","PeriodicalId":21957,"journal":{"name":"Spectroscopy","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CSA: Much Ado About Nothing?\",\"authors\":\"R. Mcdowall\",\"doi\":\"10.56530/spectroscopy.hm6969t6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computerized system validation (CSV) in good practice (GxP)-regulated laboratories is alleged to take ages and generate piles of paper to keep inspectors and auditors quiet. To the rescue is the draft FDA guidance on computer software assurance (CSA). But...is this really the case?\",\"PeriodicalId\":21957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spectroscopy\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spectroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56530/spectroscopy.hm6969t6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPECTROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56530/spectroscopy.hm6969t6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

计算机化系统验证(CSV)在良好实践(GxP)规范的实验室中被指控要花很长时间,并且要生成成堆的文件来让检查员和审计员保持沉默。FDA关于计算机软件保证(CSA)的指导草案可以帮助解决这个问题。但是…这是真的吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CSA: Much Ado About Nothing?
Computerized system validation (CSV) in good practice (GxP)-regulated laboratories is alleged to take ages and generate piles of paper to keep inspectors and auditors quiet. To the rescue is the draft FDA guidance on computer software assurance (CSA). But...is this really the case?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy 物理-光谱学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Spectroscopy welcomes manuscripts that describe techniques and applications of all forms of spectroscopy and that are of immediate interest to users in industry, academia, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信