医院充血性心力衰竭患者体液平衡监测:最佳实践实施项目。

Shu-Hua Yang, P. Mu, Hsiu-ling Wu, Marianne Curia
{"title":"医院充血性心力衰竭患者体液平衡监测:最佳实践实施项目。","authors":"Shu-Hua Yang, P. Mu, Hsiu-ling Wu, Marianne Curia","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThis aim of this project was to promote best practice in fluid balance monitoring in congestive heart failure patients.\n\n\nINTRODUCTION\nFluid overload or pulmonary/vascular congestion is a common clinical feature of patients with heart failure and is associated with adverse outcomes. Maintaining records of patients' fluid intake and output (I&O) has long been considered an important aspect of nursing care to assess hydration status. In clinical practice, a prevalence of incongruence between I&O results and clinical signs and symptoms has been noted. We postulate that this incongruence may be due to an inaccurate or non-comprehensive collection of fluid I&O and/or the patient's and their families' inadequate recognition of the importance of I&O recording.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis implementation project was conducted in a cardiology ward of a medical hospital using the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System. Three audit criteria were utilized to represent best practice recommendations for fluid balance monitoring. A pre-implementation audit was conducted, followed by development of multiple interventions identified from a Getting Research into Practice analysis. Two post-implementation audits were conducted to determine the change in practice.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe post-implementation audit data demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across the measured best practice criteria. Specifically, improvement in compliance was noted in: i) fluid balance charts being utilized in conjunction with physical assessment and electrolyte monitoring to assess the hydration status of a patient (from 58% to 100% compliance); ii) patient involvement in more accurate documentation (from 42% to 75% compliance); and iii) staff education in fluid balance monitoring and documentation (from 53% to 100% compliance).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nFluid record omission was reduced at the completion of the project secondary to an increased awareness of the fluid record omission standards among patients as well as physical assessment and fluid overload correlation among the nursing staff in the unit. The findings demonstrate how audits can be utilized to promote best practice in healthcare. Additionally, the data indicates that focused education and the provision of relevant resources can have an immediate and positive impact on clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid balance monitoring in congestive heart failure patients in hospital: a best practice implementation project.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Hua Yang, P. Mu, Hsiu-ling Wu, Marianne Curia\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nThis aim of this project was to promote best practice in fluid balance monitoring in congestive heart failure patients.\\n\\n\\nINTRODUCTION\\nFluid overload or pulmonary/vascular congestion is a common clinical feature of patients with heart failure and is associated with adverse outcomes. Maintaining records of patients' fluid intake and output (I&O) has long been considered an important aspect of nursing care to assess hydration status. In clinical practice, a prevalence of incongruence between I&O results and clinical signs and symptoms has been noted. We postulate that this incongruence may be due to an inaccurate or non-comprehensive collection of fluid I&O and/or the patient's and their families' inadequate recognition of the importance of I&O recording.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis implementation project was conducted in a cardiology ward of a medical hospital using the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System. Three audit criteria were utilized to represent best practice recommendations for fluid balance monitoring. A pre-implementation audit was conducted, followed by development of multiple interventions identified from a Getting Research into Practice analysis. Two post-implementation audits were conducted to determine the change in practice.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe post-implementation audit data demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across the measured best practice criteria. Specifically, improvement in compliance was noted in: i) fluid balance charts being utilized in conjunction with physical assessment and electrolyte monitoring to assess the hydration status of a patient (from 58% to 100% compliance); ii) patient involvement in more accurate documentation (from 42% to 75% compliance); and iii) staff education in fluid balance monitoring and documentation (from 53% to 100% compliance).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nFluid record omission was reduced at the completion of the project secondary to an increased awareness of the fluid record omission standards among patients as well as physical assessment and fluid overload correlation among the nursing staff in the unit. The findings demonstrate how audits can be utilized to promote best practice in healthcare. Additionally, the data indicates that focused education and the provision of relevant resources can have an immediate and positive impact on clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:促进充血性心力衰竭患者体液平衡监测的最佳实践。液体超载或肺/血管充血是心力衰竭患者的常见临床特征,并与不良结局相关。长期以来,保持患者液体摄入和排出(I&O)的记录一直被认为是评估水合状态的护理的一个重要方面。在临床实践中,已注意到I&O结果与临床体征和症状之间普遍存在不一致。我们假设这种不一致可能是由于不准确或不全面的液体I&O收集和/或患者及其家属对I&O记录的重要性认识不足。方法本实施项目在某医院心内科病房采用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所临床证据实际应用系统进行。采用三项审计标准作为流体平衡监测的最佳做法建议。进行了实施前审计,随后制定了从研究转化为实践分析中确定的多种干预措施。进行了两次执行后审计,以确定做法的变化。结果实施后的审计数据显示,在衡量的最佳实践标准中,结果显著改善。具体而言,依从性的改善体现在:i)体液平衡图与身体评估和电解质监测结合使用,以评估患者的水合状态(依从性从58%提高到100%);Ii)患者参与更准确的记录(从42%到75%的依从性);iii)对员工进行流体平衡监测和文件编制方面的教育(合规率从53%提高到100%)。结论在项目完成后,由于患者对漏液记录标准的认识提高,以及护理人员对身体评估和体液超载的相关性的认识提高,漏液记录减少。研究结果表明如何利用审计来促进医疗保健领域的最佳实践。此外,数据表明,重点教育和提供相关资源可以对临床实践产生直接和积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluid balance monitoring in congestive heart failure patients in hospital: a best practice implementation project.
OBJECTIVES This aim of this project was to promote best practice in fluid balance monitoring in congestive heart failure patients. INTRODUCTION Fluid overload or pulmonary/vascular congestion is a common clinical feature of patients with heart failure and is associated with adverse outcomes. Maintaining records of patients' fluid intake and output (I&O) has long been considered an important aspect of nursing care to assess hydration status. In clinical practice, a prevalence of incongruence between I&O results and clinical signs and symptoms has been noted. We postulate that this incongruence may be due to an inaccurate or non-comprehensive collection of fluid I&O and/or the patient's and their families' inadequate recognition of the importance of I&O recording. METHODS This implementation project was conducted in a cardiology ward of a medical hospital using the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System. Three audit criteria were utilized to represent best practice recommendations for fluid balance monitoring. A pre-implementation audit was conducted, followed by development of multiple interventions identified from a Getting Research into Practice analysis. Two post-implementation audits were conducted to determine the change in practice. RESULTS The post-implementation audit data demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across the measured best practice criteria. Specifically, improvement in compliance was noted in: i) fluid balance charts being utilized in conjunction with physical assessment and electrolyte monitoring to assess the hydration status of a patient (from 58% to 100% compliance); ii) patient involvement in more accurate documentation (from 42% to 75% compliance); and iii) staff education in fluid balance monitoring and documentation (from 53% to 100% compliance). CONCLUSION Fluid record omission was reduced at the completion of the project secondary to an increased awareness of the fluid record omission standards among patients as well as physical assessment and fluid overload correlation among the nursing staff in the unit. The findings demonstrate how audits can be utilized to promote best practice in healthcare. Additionally, the data indicates that focused education and the provision of relevant resources can have an immediate and positive impact on clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信