Xiaoya Guo, D. Tang, D. Molony, Chun Yang, H. Samady, Jie Zheng, G. Mintz, A. Maehara, Jian Zhu, G. Ma, M. Matsumura, D. Giddens
{"title":"基于IVUS和OCT随访图像的患者特异性流体-结构相互作用模型预测斑块进展","authors":"Xiaoya Guo, D. Tang, D. Molony, Chun Yang, H. Samady, Jie Zheng, G. Mintz, A. Maehara, Jian Zhu, G. Ma, M. Matsumura, D. Giddens","doi":"10.32604/MCB.2019.05743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Atherosclerotic plaque progression is generally considered to be closely associated with morphological and mechanical factors. Plaque morphological information on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images could complement each other and provide for more accurate plaque morphology. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models combining IVUS and OCT were constructed to obtain accurate plaque stress/strain and flow shear stress data for analysis. Accuracy and completeness of imaging and advanced modeling lead to accurate plaque progression predictions. \nIn vivo IVUS and OCT coronary plaque data at baseline and follow-up were acquired from left circumflex coronary and right coronary artery of one patient with patient’s consent obtained. Co-registration and segmentation of baseline and follow-up IVUS and OCT images were performed by experts. Baseline and follow-up 3D FSI models with cyclic bending based on merged IVUS and OCT data were constructed to obtain plaque stress/strain and flow shear stress data for plaque progression prediction. Nine factors (6 morphological factors and 3 mechanical factors) including average cap thickness, lipid area, calcification area, lumen area, plaque area, plaque burden, wall shear stress (WSS), plaque wall stress (PWS) and plaque wall strain (PWSn) were selected for each slice. Plaque area increase (PAI) and plaque burden increase (PBI) were chosen to measure plaque progression and serve as the target variables for prediction. All possible combinations of nine factors were fed to a generalized linear mixed model for PAI and PBI prediction and quantification of their prediction accuracies. \nIn this paper, prediction accuracy was defined as the sum of sensitivity and specificity. The optimized predictor combining 9 factors gave the best prediction for PAI with accuracy=1.7087 (sensitivity: 0.8679; specificity: 0.8408). PWSn was the best single-factor predictor for PAI with accuracy=1.5918 (sensitivity: 0.7143; specificity 0.8776). A combination of average cap thickness, calcification area, plaque area, PWS and PWSn gave the best prediction for PBI with accuracy=1.8698 (sensitivity: 0.8892; specificity: 0.9806). PWSn was also the best single-factor predictor for PBI with accuracy=1.8461 (sensitivity: 0.8784; specificity 0.9677). Although WSS was commonly accepted as an important factor for plaque progression, it showed relatively poor ability for prediction of plaque progression in any measure (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of PAI: 1.0607, 0.0893, 0.9714; PBI: 1.5431/0.6811/0.9032). \nCombining morphological and mechanical risk factors may lead to more accurate progression prediction, compared to the predictions using single factor. PWSn is better than WSS for plaque progression using single factor. IVUS+OCT formed basis for accurate data for morphological and mechanical factors. \nAcknowledgement: This research was supported in part by NIH grant R01 EB004759, and a Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Agency grant BE2016785.","PeriodicalId":48719,"journal":{"name":"Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Plaque Progression Using Patient-Specific Fluid-Structure-Interaction Models Based on IVUS and OCT Images with Follow-Up\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoya Guo, D. Tang, D. Molony, Chun Yang, H. Samady, Jie Zheng, G. Mintz, A. Maehara, Jian Zhu, G. Ma, M. Matsumura, D. Giddens\",\"doi\":\"10.32604/MCB.2019.05743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Atherosclerotic plaque progression is generally considered to be closely associated with morphological and mechanical factors. Plaque morphological information on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images could complement each other and provide for more accurate plaque morphology. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models combining IVUS and OCT were constructed to obtain accurate plaque stress/strain and flow shear stress data for analysis. Accuracy and completeness of imaging and advanced modeling lead to accurate plaque progression predictions. \\nIn vivo IVUS and OCT coronary plaque data at baseline and follow-up were acquired from left circumflex coronary and right coronary artery of one patient with patient’s consent obtained. Co-registration and segmentation of baseline and follow-up IVUS and OCT images were performed by experts. Baseline and follow-up 3D FSI models with cyclic bending based on merged IVUS and OCT data were constructed to obtain plaque stress/strain and flow shear stress data for plaque progression prediction. Nine factors (6 morphological factors and 3 mechanical factors) including average cap thickness, lipid area, calcification area, lumen area, plaque area, plaque burden, wall shear stress (WSS), plaque wall stress (PWS) and plaque wall strain (PWSn) were selected for each slice. Plaque area increase (PAI) and plaque burden increase (PBI) were chosen to measure plaque progression and serve as the target variables for prediction. All possible combinations of nine factors were fed to a generalized linear mixed model for PAI and PBI prediction and quantification of their prediction accuracies. \\nIn this paper, prediction accuracy was defined as the sum of sensitivity and specificity. The optimized predictor combining 9 factors gave the best prediction for PAI with accuracy=1.7087 (sensitivity: 0.8679; specificity: 0.8408). PWSn was the best single-factor predictor for PAI with accuracy=1.5918 (sensitivity: 0.7143; specificity 0.8776). A combination of average cap thickness, calcification area, plaque area, PWS and PWSn gave the best prediction for PBI with accuracy=1.8698 (sensitivity: 0.8892; specificity: 0.9806). PWSn was also the best single-factor predictor for PBI with accuracy=1.8461 (sensitivity: 0.8784; specificity 0.9677). Although WSS was commonly accepted as an important factor for plaque progression, it showed relatively poor ability for prediction of plaque progression in any measure (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of PAI: 1.0607, 0.0893, 0.9714; PBI: 1.5431/0.6811/0.9032). \\nCombining morphological and mechanical risk factors may lead to more accurate progression prediction, compared to the predictions using single factor. PWSn is better than WSS for plaque progression using single factor. IVUS+OCT formed basis for accurate data for morphological and mechanical factors. \\nAcknowledgement: This research was supported in part by NIH grant R01 EB004759, and a Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Agency grant BE2016785.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32604/MCB.2019.05743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/MCB.2019.05743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting Plaque Progression Using Patient-Specific Fluid-Structure-Interaction Models Based on IVUS and OCT Images with Follow-Up
Atherosclerotic plaque progression is generally considered to be closely associated with morphological and mechanical factors. Plaque morphological information on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images could complement each other and provide for more accurate plaque morphology. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models combining IVUS and OCT were constructed to obtain accurate plaque stress/strain and flow shear stress data for analysis. Accuracy and completeness of imaging and advanced modeling lead to accurate plaque progression predictions.
In vivo IVUS and OCT coronary plaque data at baseline and follow-up were acquired from left circumflex coronary and right coronary artery of one patient with patient’s consent obtained. Co-registration and segmentation of baseline and follow-up IVUS and OCT images were performed by experts. Baseline and follow-up 3D FSI models with cyclic bending based on merged IVUS and OCT data were constructed to obtain plaque stress/strain and flow shear stress data for plaque progression prediction. Nine factors (6 morphological factors and 3 mechanical factors) including average cap thickness, lipid area, calcification area, lumen area, plaque area, plaque burden, wall shear stress (WSS), plaque wall stress (PWS) and plaque wall strain (PWSn) were selected for each slice. Plaque area increase (PAI) and plaque burden increase (PBI) were chosen to measure plaque progression and serve as the target variables for prediction. All possible combinations of nine factors were fed to a generalized linear mixed model for PAI and PBI prediction and quantification of their prediction accuracies.
In this paper, prediction accuracy was defined as the sum of sensitivity and specificity. The optimized predictor combining 9 factors gave the best prediction for PAI with accuracy=1.7087 (sensitivity: 0.8679; specificity: 0.8408). PWSn was the best single-factor predictor for PAI with accuracy=1.5918 (sensitivity: 0.7143; specificity 0.8776). A combination of average cap thickness, calcification area, plaque area, PWS and PWSn gave the best prediction for PBI with accuracy=1.8698 (sensitivity: 0.8892; specificity: 0.9806). PWSn was also the best single-factor predictor for PBI with accuracy=1.8461 (sensitivity: 0.8784; specificity 0.9677). Although WSS was commonly accepted as an important factor for plaque progression, it showed relatively poor ability for prediction of plaque progression in any measure (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity of PAI: 1.0607, 0.0893, 0.9714; PBI: 1.5431/0.6811/0.9032).
Combining morphological and mechanical risk factors may lead to more accurate progression prediction, compared to the predictions using single factor. PWSn is better than WSS for plaque progression using single factor. IVUS+OCT formed basis for accurate data for morphological and mechanical factors.
Acknowledgement: This research was supported in part by NIH grant R01 EB004759, and a Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Agency grant BE2016785.
期刊介绍:
The field of biomechanics concerns with motion, deformation, and forces in biological systems. With the explosive progress in molecular biology, genomic engineering, bioimaging, and nanotechnology, there will be an ever-increasing generation of knowledge and information concerning the mechanobiology of genes, proteins, cells, tissues, and organs. Such information will bring new diagnostic tools, new therapeutic approaches, and new knowledge on ourselves and our interactions with our environment. It becomes apparent that biomechanics focusing on molecules, cells as well as tissues and organs is an important aspect of modern biomedical sciences. The aims of this journal are to facilitate the studies of the mechanics of biomolecules (including proteins, genes, cytoskeletons, etc.), cells (and their interactions with extracellular matrix), tissues and organs, the development of relevant advanced mathematical methods, and the discovery of biological secrets. As science concerns only with relative truth, we seek ideas that are state-of-the-art, which may be controversial, but stimulate and promote new ideas, new techniques, and new applications.