人权能做什么?非殖民化调查

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Transmodernity Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5070/T495051209
Benjamin P. Davis
{"title":"人权能做什么?非殖民化调查","authors":"Benjamin P. Davis","doi":"10.5070/T495051209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Davis, Benjamin P. | Abstract: It is one thing to consider what human rights have been and another to inquire into what they could be. In this essay, I present a history of human rights vis-a-vis decolonization. I follow the scholarship of Samuel Moyn to suggest that human rights presented a “moral alternative” to political utopias. The question remains how to politicize the moral energy around human rights today. I argue that defending what Edouard Glissant calls a “right to opacity” could politicize the ethical energy around human rights today. Glissant’s right to opacity outlines a blueprint for the praxis of human rights to shift from a “functional model” to a “critical model,” to use Enrique Dussel’s distinction. My ultimate aim is to show how social movements around human rights and decolonization could converge today.","PeriodicalId":30612,"journal":{"name":"Transmodernity","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Could Human Rights Do? A Decolonial Inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin P. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/T495051209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Davis, Benjamin P. | Abstract: It is one thing to consider what human rights have been and another to inquire into what they could be. In this essay, I present a history of human rights vis-a-vis decolonization. I follow the scholarship of Samuel Moyn to suggest that human rights presented a “moral alternative” to political utopias. The question remains how to politicize the moral energy around human rights today. I argue that defending what Edouard Glissant calls a “right to opacity” could politicize the ethical energy around human rights today. Glissant’s right to opacity outlines a blueprint for the praxis of human rights to shift from a “functional model” to a “critical model,” to use Enrique Dussel’s distinction. My ultimate aim is to show how social movements around human rights and decolonization could converge today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transmodernity\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transmodernity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/T495051209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transmodernity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/T495051209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:思考人权的过去是一回事,探究人权的未来是另一回事。在这篇文章中,我介绍了人权相对于非殖民化的历史。我遵循塞缪尔•莫恩(Samuel Moyn)的学术观点,认为人权是政治乌托邦之外的“道德选择”。今天的问题仍然是如何将围绕人权的道德能量政治化。我认为捍卫爱德华·格里桑特所说的“不透明权”可能会使当今围绕人权的伦理能量政治化。用恩里克·杜塞尔(Enrique Dussel)的区别来说,格里桑特的不透明权概述了人权实践从“功能模式”向“关键模式”转变的蓝图。我的最终目的是展示围绕人权和非殖民化的社会运动如何在今天融合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Could Human Rights Do? A Decolonial Inquiry
Author(s): Davis, Benjamin P. | Abstract: It is one thing to consider what human rights have been and another to inquire into what they could be. In this essay, I present a history of human rights vis-a-vis decolonization. I follow the scholarship of Samuel Moyn to suggest that human rights presented a “moral alternative” to political utopias. The question remains how to politicize the moral energy around human rights today. I argue that defending what Edouard Glissant calls a “right to opacity” could politicize the ethical energy around human rights today. Glissant’s right to opacity outlines a blueprint for the praxis of human rights to shift from a “functional model” to a “critical model,” to use Enrique Dussel’s distinction. My ultimate aim is to show how social movements around human rights and decolonization could converge today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transmodernity
Transmodernity Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信