{"title":"精神病学认知障碍筛查(SCIP-S)与法医精神病学最小状态检查(MMSE)的比较。试点研究","authors":"Priscila Caballero Casanoves , César Jesús Correas Soto , Óscar Pino López , Judith Prió Silvestre","doi":"10.1016/j.remle.2022.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective is to compare 2 brief cognitive screening tests, MMSE and SCIP-S, and determine their usefulness in assessing the cognitive status of subjects diagnosed with psychiatric pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>Pilot study of a series of 33 cases from the Institutes of Legal Medicine of Catalonia and Andorra, whose inclusion criterion was the existence of a psychiatric pathology categorised in ICD-10. In all cases, in addition to the forensic </span>medical interview, MMSE was administered followed by SCIP-S.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In MMSE, 31 of the 33 interviewees obtained a total direct score ≥ 24 (normal cognitive performance). In SCIP-S, only 5 of the 33 participants were in a percentile ≥<!--> <!-->15 (normal cognitive performance). The difference between the results of both tests was statistically significant (P < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggests a greater usefulness of SCIP-S compared to MMSE in detecting cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients. Therefore, the use of the former is recommended in forensic medical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101178,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":"48 3","pages":"Pages 92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Screening Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S) and Minimental State Examination (MMSE) in Forensic Psychiatry. Pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Priscila Caballero Casanoves , César Jesús Correas Soto , Óscar Pino López , Judith Prió Silvestre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.remle.2022.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective is to compare 2 brief cognitive screening tests, MMSE and SCIP-S, and determine their usefulness in assessing the cognitive status of subjects diagnosed with psychiatric pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p><span>Pilot study of a series of 33 cases from the Institutes of Legal Medicine of Catalonia and Andorra, whose inclusion criterion was the existence of a psychiatric pathology categorised in ICD-10. In all cases, in addition to the forensic </span>medical interview, MMSE was administered followed by SCIP-S.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In MMSE, 31 of the 33 interviewees obtained a total direct score ≥ 24 (normal cognitive performance). In SCIP-S, only 5 of the 33 participants were in a percentile ≥<!--> <!-->15 (normal cognitive performance). The difference between the results of both tests was statistically significant (P < 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study suggests a greater usefulness of SCIP-S compared to MMSE in detecting cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients. Therefore, the use of the former is recommended in forensic medical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 92-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445424922000231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445424922000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between Screening Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S) and Minimental State Examination (MMSE) in Forensic Psychiatry. Pilot study
Objectives
The objective is to compare 2 brief cognitive screening tests, MMSE and SCIP-S, and determine their usefulness in assessing the cognitive status of subjects diagnosed with psychiatric pathology.
Material and methods
Pilot study of a series of 33 cases from the Institutes of Legal Medicine of Catalonia and Andorra, whose inclusion criterion was the existence of a psychiatric pathology categorised in ICD-10. In all cases, in addition to the forensic medical interview, MMSE was administered followed by SCIP-S.
Results
In MMSE, 31 of the 33 interviewees obtained a total direct score ≥ 24 (normal cognitive performance). In SCIP-S, only 5 of the 33 participants were in a percentile ≥ 15 (normal cognitive performance). The difference between the results of both tests was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
This study suggests a greater usefulness of SCIP-S compared to MMSE in detecting cognitive deficits in psychiatric patients. Therefore, the use of the former is recommended in forensic medical practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
