激光辅助脊保存联合富血小板纤维蛋白和/或骨的评价

Rehab Osman, Naglaa Elkilani, H. Adawy, M. Attia
{"title":"激光辅助脊保存联合富血小板纤维蛋白和/或骨的评价","authors":"Rehab Osman, Naglaa Elkilani, H. Adawy, M. Attia","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2021.76197.1382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The main target of our split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate how well laser assisted ridge preservation worked in conjunction with platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and/or bone clinical and radiographically. Subjects and Methods: Thirty extraction sockets from ten patients were split into three groups at random; group I treated by PRF and bone graft after atraumatic extraction, group II (PRF and laser assisted socket preservation) and group III (PRF, bone graft and laser assisted socket preservation). Width and height of the alveolar ridge observed at baseline, three and six months after treatment. Bone density recorded at six months after treatment using cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Results: The mean ridge width in Groups II and III was statistically significantly higher than in Group I. After three and six months, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in ridge height. Group II had a higher mean of bone density. Conclusion: Within the scope of this research, laser-assisted ridge preservation appears to have better clinical and radiographic outcomes following tooth extraction.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Laser Assisted Ridge Preservation Combined with Platelet Rich Fibrin and /or Bone\",\"authors\":\"Rehab Osman, Naglaa Elkilani, H. Adawy, M. Attia\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/adjg.2021.76197.1382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The main target of our split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate how well laser assisted ridge preservation worked in conjunction with platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and/or bone clinical and radiographically. Subjects and Methods: Thirty extraction sockets from ten patients were split into three groups at random; group I treated by PRF and bone graft after atraumatic extraction, group II (PRF and laser assisted socket preservation) and group III (PRF, bone graft and laser assisted socket preservation). Width and height of the alveolar ridge observed at baseline, three and six months after treatment. Bone density recorded at six months after treatment using cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Results: The mean ridge width in Groups II and III was statistically significantly higher than in Group I. After three and six months, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in ridge height. Group II had a higher mean of bone density. Conclusion: Within the scope of this research, laser-assisted ridge preservation appears to have better clinical and radiographic outcomes following tooth extraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2021.76197.1382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2021.76197.1382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的裂口随机对照临床试验的主要目标是评估激光辅助嵴保存与富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)和/或骨临床和放射学的效果。对象与方法:10例患者30个拔牙槽随机分为3组;ⅰ组(PRF +非外伤拔牙后植骨)、ⅱ组(PRF +激光辅助保存窝)和ⅲ组(PRF +植骨+激光辅助保存窝)。治疗后3个月和6个月观察牙槽嵴宽度和高度。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)记录治疗后6个月的骨密度。结果:II组和III组的平均脊宽明显高于i组。3个月和6个月后,三组间脊高差异无统计学意义。第二组平均骨密度较高。结论:在本研究范围内,激光辅助牙脊保存在拔牙后具有更好的临床和影像学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Laser Assisted Ridge Preservation Combined with Platelet Rich Fibrin and /or Bone
Purpose: The main target of our split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate how well laser assisted ridge preservation worked in conjunction with platelet rich fibrin (PRF) and/or bone clinical and radiographically. Subjects and Methods: Thirty extraction sockets from ten patients were split into three groups at random; group I treated by PRF and bone graft after atraumatic extraction, group II (PRF and laser assisted socket preservation) and group III (PRF, bone graft and laser assisted socket preservation). Width and height of the alveolar ridge observed at baseline, three and six months after treatment. Bone density recorded at six months after treatment using cone beam computer tomography (CBCT). Results: The mean ridge width in Groups II and III was statistically significantly higher than in Group I. After three and six months, there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in ridge height. Group II had a higher mean of bone density. Conclusion: Within the scope of this research, laser-assisted ridge preservation appears to have better clinical and radiographic outcomes following tooth extraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信