Ryan Gao, Michael van der Merwe, Brendan Coleman, Matthew J Boyle, Christopher Ma Frampton, Marc Hirner
{"title":"55岁以下患者的反向肩关节置换术的结果:来自新西兰关节登记处的结果。","authors":"Ryan Gao, Michael van der Merwe, Brendan Coleman, Matthew J Boyle, Christopher Ma Frampton, Marc Hirner","doi":"10.1177/17585732221104745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The appropriate age at which to perform reverse shoulder arthroplasty is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty between younger and older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between January 2000 and December 2019 were identified from New Zealand Joint Registry records. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to age at the time of surgery: < 55 years and ≥ 55 years. These two groups were then compared with regard to baseline characteristics, indications for surgery, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score and American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5518 primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases were identified, with 75 patients < 55 years at the time of surgery (range: 34-54 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.36 years (range: 0.11-13.37 years) in the younger cohort and 3.10 years (range: 0.01-16.22 years) in the older patient cohort. Indications for surgery differed significantly between the two groups, with younger patients having higher rates of inflammatory arthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.001), posttraumatic arthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and avascular necrosis (<i>p</i> = 0.049). The younger cohort had an inferior 6-month postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score compared to the older cohort (mean: 28.5 [younger cohort] vs. 35.7 [older cohort]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in revision rate between the younger and older patient cohorts during the study period (1.56 [<55 years] vs. 0.74 [≥55 years] revisions per 100 component-years; <i>p</i> = 0.332).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our early results suggest that younger patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate high implant retention rates, comparable to older patients. Longer-term patient-reported outcomes in younger patients are required to guide appropriate patient selection for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective case-control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45476,"journal":{"name":"NOTES AND QUERIES","volume":"1 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years old: Results from the New Zealand joint registry.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Gao, Michael van der Merwe, Brendan Coleman, Matthew J Boyle, Christopher Ma Frampton, Marc Hirner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732221104745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The appropriate age at which to perform reverse shoulder arthroplasty is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty between younger and older patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between January 2000 and December 2019 were identified from New Zealand Joint Registry records. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to age at the time of surgery: < 55 years and ≥ 55 years. These two groups were then compared with regard to baseline characteristics, indications for surgery, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score and American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5518 primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases were identified, with 75 patients < 55 years at the time of surgery (range: 34-54 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.36 years (range: 0.11-13.37 years) in the younger cohort and 3.10 years (range: 0.01-16.22 years) in the older patient cohort. Indications for surgery differed significantly between the two groups, with younger patients having higher rates of inflammatory arthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.001), posttraumatic arthritis (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and avascular necrosis (<i>p</i> = 0.049). The younger cohort had an inferior 6-month postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score compared to the older cohort (mean: 28.5 [younger cohort] vs. 35.7 [older cohort]; <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in revision rate between the younger and older patient cohorts during the study period (1.56 [<55 years] vs. 0.74 [≥55 years] revisions per 100 component-years; <i>p</i> = 0.332).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our early results suggest that younger patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate high implant retention rates, comparable to older patients. Longer-term patient-reported outcomes in younger patients are required to guide appropriate patient selection for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective case-control study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NOTES AND QUERIES\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"69-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10649512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NOTES AND QUERIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732221104745\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOTES AND QUERIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732221104745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:进行反向肩关节置换术的合适年龄是有争议的。本研究的目的是比较年轻和老年患者的反向肩关节置换术的结果。方法:从新西兰联合登记处的记录中确定2000年1月至2019年12月期间接受原发性反向肩关节置换术的患者。患者根据手术时的年龄分为两组:< 55岁和≥55岁。然后使用牛津肩关节评分和美国肩关节评分(ASES)比较两组患者的基线特征、手术指征、翻修率和患者报告的结果。结果:共发现5518例原发性反向肩关节置换术患者,其中75例患者手术时< 55岁(范围:34-54岁)。年轻组的平均随访时间为2.36年(范围:0.11-13.37年),老年组的平均随访时间为3.10年(范围:0.01-16.22年)。两组患者的手术适应症差异显著,年轻患者的炎性关节炎发生率较高(p p p = 0.049)。与老年队列相比,年轻队列术后6个月的牛津肩部评分较低(平均:28.5[年轻队列]对35.7[老年队列];p = 0.332)。结论:我们的早期结果表明,与老年患者相比,接受反向肩关节置换术的年轻患者具有较高的植入物保留率。需要年轻患者报告的长期预后来指导适当的患者选择反向肩关节置换术。证据等级:III级,回顾性病例对照研究。
Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients under 55 years old: Results from the New Zealand joint registry.
Background: The appropriate age at which to perform reverse shoulder arthroplasty is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty between younger and older patients.
Methods: Patients who underwent primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty between January 2000 and December 2019 were identified from New Zealand Joint Registry records. Patients were stratified into two cohorts according to age at the time of surgery: < 55 years and ≥ 55 years. These two groups were then compared with regard to baseline characteristics, indications for surgery, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes using the Oxford Shoulder Score and American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES).
Results: A total of 5518 primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases were identified, with 75 patients < 55 years at the time of surgery (range: 34-54 years). The mean duration of follow-up was 2.36 years (range: 0.11-13.37 years) in the younger cohort and 3.10 years (range: 0.01-16.22 years) in the older patient cohort. Indications for surgery differed significantly between the two groups, with younger patients having higher rates of inflammatory arthritis (p < 0.001), posttraumatic arthritis (p < 0.001), and avascular necrosis (p = 0.049). The younger cohort had an inferior 6-month postoperative Oxford Shoulder Score compared to the older cohort (mean: 28.5 [younger cohort] vs. 35.7 [older cohort]; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in revision rate between the younger and older patient cohorts during the study period (1.56 [<55 years] vs. 0.74 [≥55 years] revisions per 100 component-years; p = 0.332).
Conclusion: Our early results suggest that younger patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate high implant retention rates, comparable to older patients. Longer-term patient-reported outcomes in younger patients are required to guide appropriate patient selection for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective case-control study.
期刊介绍:
Founded under the editorship of the antiquary W J Thoms, the primary intention of Notes and Queries was, and still remains, the asking and answering of readers" questions. It is devoted principally to English language and literature, lexicography, history, and scholarly antiquarianism. Each issue focuses on the works of a particular period, with an emphasis on the factual rather than the speculative. The journal comprises notes, book reviews, readers" queries and replies.