Zubair Zubair, M. Farkhan, Zakiya Darojat, M. A. Suriadi, Masri Mansoer, Abdul Fattah
{"title":"穆罕默迪亚的伊斯兰教与苏菲主义在净化与现代化之间","authors":"Zubair Zubair, M. Farkhan, Zakiya Darojat, M. A. Suriadi, Masri Mansoer, Abdul Fattah","doi":"10.15408/insaniyat.v7i2.31505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to reveal the purification or modernization performed by Muhammadiyah in Sufism, especially concerning the practical mysticism in sufi order and philosophical mysticism on the concepts of ittihād, hulūl, and wahdat al wujūd. The research data is gathered from the official document Muhammadiyah records, such as fatwas of Muhammadiyah's Majlis Tarjih and Tajdid, Hamka's thoughts and AR Fakhruddin’s performance as former leaders of Muhammadiyah. This study uses content analysis to determine the position of Muhammadiyah's views on the early Sufi. The result showed that tajdīd performed by Muhammadiyah is called purification and it harmonious with modern life. It differs with the meaning and practices of early Sufism. Muhammadiyah's position towards tarīqa is positive as long as the understanding and practice of Islam are derived from the guidance of the Qur'an and valid Sunnah. As for the concepts of ittihād, hulūl and wahdat al-wujūd, Muhammadiyah rejects them because there is an element of equating God with humans or pantheism, which has no basis in the Qur'an and Sunnah. This rejection is in line with what has been done by early Sufism scholars such as al-Sarrāj, al-Juwairī, al-Syahrastānī, and al-Kalabāżī.","PeriodicalId":32465,"journal":{"name":"Insaniyat Journal of Islam and Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muhammadiyah's Tajdīd and Sufism between Purification and Modernization\",\"authors\":\"Zubair Zubair, M. Farkhan, Zakiya Darojat, M. A. Suriadi, Masri Mansoer, Abdul Fattah\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/insaniyat.v7i2.31505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to reveal the purification or modernization performed by Muhammadiyah in Sufism, especially concerning the practical mysticism in sufi order and philosophical mysticism on the concepts of ittihād, hulūl, and wahdat al wujūd. The research data is gathered from the official document Muhammadiyah records, such as fatwas of Muhammadiyah's Majlis Tarjih and Tajdid, Hamka's thoughts and AR Fakhruddin’s performance as former leaders of Muhammadiyah. This study uses content analysis to determine the position of Muhammadiyah's views on the early Sufi. The result showed that tajdīd performed by Muhammadiyah is called purification and it harmonious with modern life. It differs with the meaning and practices of early Sufism. Muhammadiyah's position towards tarīqa is positive as long as the understanding and practice of Islam are derived from the guidance of the Qur'an and valid Sunnah. As for the concepts of ittihād, hulūl and wahdat al-wujūd, Muhammadiyah rejects them because there is an element of equating God with humans or pantheism, which has no basis in the Qur'an and Sunnah. This rejection is in line with what has been done by early Sufism scholars such as al-Sarrāj, al-Juwairī, al-Syahrastānī, and al-Kalabāżī.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insaniyat Journal of Islam and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insaniyat Journal of Islam and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/insaniyat.v7i2.31505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insaniyat Journal of Islam and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/insaniyat.v7i2.31505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在揭示默罕默迪亚在苏菲主义中所进行的净化或现代化,特别是苏菲秩序中的实践神秘主义和哲学神秘主义在ittihād、hulūl和wahdat al wujūd概念上的表现。研究数据收集自穆罕默迪亚的官方文件记录,如穆罕默迪亚的Majlis Tarjih和Tajdid的教令,Hamka的思想和AR Fakhruddin作为穆罕默迪亚前领导人的表现。本研究使用内容分析来确定穆罕默德迪亚对早期苏菲派的看法的立场。结果表明,穆罕默迪亚所做的“净化”是与现代生活和谐相处的。它不同于早期苏非主义的意义和实践。穆罕默迪亚对tartarqa的立场是积极的,只要对伊斯兰教的理解和实践来自古兰经和有效的圣训的指导。至于ittihād, hulūl和wahdat al-wujūd的概念,穆罕默迪亚拒绝它们,因为它们有将上帝等同于人类或泛神论的元素,这在古兰经和圣训中没有基础。这种拒绝与早期苏非主义学者如al-Sarrāj、al- juwairi、al-Syahrastānī和al-Kalabāżī所做的一致。
Muhammadiyah's Tajdīd and Sufism between Purification and Modernization
This article aims to reveal the purification or modernization performed by Muhammadiyah in Sufism, especially concerning the practical mysticism in sufi order and philosophical mysticism on the concepts of ittihād, hulūl, and wahdat al wujūd. The research data is gathered from the official document Muhammadiyah records, such as fatwas of Muhammadiyah's Majlis Tarjih and Tajdid, Hamka's thoughts and AR Fakhruddin’s performance as former leaders of Muhammadiyah. This study uses content analysis to determine the position of Muhammadiyah's views on the early Sufi. The result showed that tajdīd performed by Muhammadiyah is called purification and it harmonious with modern life. It differs with the meaning and practices of early Sufism. Muhammadiyah's position towards tarīqa is positive as long as the understanding and practice of Islam are derived from the guidance of the Qur'an and valid Sunnah. As for the concepts of ittihād, hulūl and wahdat al-wujūd, Muhammadiyah rejects them because there is an element of equating God with humans or pantheism, which has no basis in the Qur'an and Sunnah. This rejection is in line with what has been done by early Sufism scholars such as al-Sarrāj, al-Juwairī, al-Syahrastānī, and al-Kalabāżī.