急性或复发性尿路感染患者尿液和粪便中分离的大肠埃希菌对喹诺酮类药物的耐药性评价

Hossein Norouzian, N. Shahrokhi, S. Sabeti, S. Bouzari, M. Pooya
{"title":"急性或复发性尿路感染患者尿液和粪便中分离的大肠埃希菌对喹诺酮类药物的耐药性评价","authors":"Hossein Norouzian, N. Shahrokhi, S. Sabeti, S. Bouzari, M. Pooya","doi":"10.29252/jommid.7.4.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"*Correspondences Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir Tel: +98 21 64112220 Fax: +98 21 64112803 Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, especially in Gram-negative uropathogens such as Escherichia coli, is the main barrier to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). In recent years, the dramatically increased resistance of E. coli to quinolones, a group of widely used antibiotics, has become a significant concern. Methods: In this descriptive crosssectional study, we collected 261 E. coli isolates from the urine and stool samples of patients, referred to or hospitalized at Loghman hospital in Tehran, Iran, with either acute or recurrent UTI. The susceptibility testing for quinolones was performed by the disk diffusion method according to the recent protocols. Results: The frequency of resistant E. coli isolates was higher against nalidixic acid than ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin (67.8% vs. 48.7% and 44.1% respectively). When comparing acute and recurrent phases of UTI, in the urine samples, no significant difference was seen in the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid and norfloxacin, while this frequency against ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in recurrent UTI (68% vs. 48.2%). However, in the stool samples, the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid was higher in recurrent UTI (77.1% vs. 55.7%), while no significant difference was seen against ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in these phases. Conclusion: Regarding the antibiotic type and frequency of the administration, the resistance pattern of E. coli to quinolones seems to differ in acute and recurrent phases of UTI.","PeriodicalId":34460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Quinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Urine and Feces of Patients with Acute or Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Norouzian, N. Shahrokhi, S. Sabeti, S. Bouzari, M. Pooya\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/jommid.7.4.120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"*Correspondences Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir Tel: +98 21 64112220 Fax: +98 21 64112803 Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, especially in Gram-negative uropathogens such as Escherichia coli, is the main barrier to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). In recent years, the dramatically increased resistance of E. coli to quinolones, a group of widely used antibiotics, has become a significant concern. Methods: In this descriptive crosssectional study, we collected 261 E. coli isolates from the urine and stool samples of patients, referred to or hospitalized at Loghman hospital in Tehran, Iran, with either acute or recurrent UTI. The susceptibility testing for quinolones was performed by the disk diffusion method according to the recent protocols. Results: The frequency of resistant E. coli isolates was higher against nalidixic acid than ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin (67.8% vs. 48.7% and 44.1% respectively). When comparing acute and recurrent phases of UTI, in the urine samples, no significant difference was seen in the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid and norfloxacin, while this frequency against ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in recurrent UTI (68% vs. 48.2%). However, in the stool samples, the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid was higher in recurrent UTI (77.1% vs. 55.7%), while no significant difference was seen against ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in these phases. Conclusion: Regarding the antibiotic type and frequency of the administration, the resistance pattern of E. coli to quinolones seems to differ in acute and recurrent phases of UTI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/jommid.7.4.120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/jommid.7.4.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

*通信Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir电话:+98 21 64112220传真:+98 21 64112803简介:抗生素耐药性,特别是革兰氏阴性尿路病原体如大肠杆菌,是治疗尿路感染(UTI)的主要障碍。近年来,大肠杆菌对喹诺酮类抗生素(一组广泛使用的抗生素)的耐药性急剧增加,已成为一个重大问题。方法:在这项描述性横断面研究中,我们从伊朗德黑兰Loghman医院转诊或住院的急性或复发性尿路感染患者的尿液和粪便样本中收集了261株大肠杆菌。喹诺酮类药物的药敏试验按现行方案采用纸片扩散法。结果:对纳利地酸的耐药率67.8%高于环丙沙星和诺氟沙星(分别为48.7%和44.1%);当比较尿路感染的急性期和复发期时,在尿液样本中,对纳利地酸和诺氟沙星耐药的分离株的频率没有显著差异,而对环丙沙星的耐药频率在复发性尿路感染中明显更高(68%对48.2%)。然而,在粪便样本中,对纳利地酸耐药的分离株在复发性UTI中出现的频率更高(77.1%对55.7%),而在这些阶段对环丙沙星和诺氟沙星无显著差异。结论:就抗生素种类和给药频率而言,大肠杆菌对喹诺酮类药物的耐药模式在尿路感染的急性期和复发期似乎有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Quinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Urine and Feces of Patients with Acute or Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
*Correspondences Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir Tel: +98 21 64112220 Fax: +98 21 64112803 Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, especially in Gram-negative uropathogens such as Escherichia coli, is the main barrier to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). In recent years, the dramatically increased resistance of E. coli to quinolones, a group of widely used antibiotics, has become a significant concern. Methods: In this descriptive crosssectional study, we collected 261 E. coli isolates from the urine and stool samples of patients, referred to or hospitalized at Loghman hospital in Tehran, Iran, with either acute or recurrent UTI. The susceptibility testing for quinolones was performed by the disk diffusion method according to the recent protocols. Results: The frequency of resistant E. coli isolates was higher against nalidixic acid than ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin (67.8% vs. 48.7% and 44.1% respectively). When comparing acute and recurrent phases of UTI, in the urine samples, no significant difference was seen in the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid and norfloxacin, while this frequency against ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in recurrent UTI (68% vs. 48.2%). However, in the stool samples, the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid was higher in recurrent UTI (77.1% vs. 55.7%), while no significant difference was seen against ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in these phases. Conclusion: Regarding the antibiotic type and frequency of the administration, the resistance pattern of E. coli to quinolones seems to differ in acute and recurrent phases of UTI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信