skip:一个简单的修改先前的模拟工具,为困难的病人讨论

J. Marshall, M. Brown, Marty Runyan, Dena Higbee
{"title":"skip:一个简单的修改先前的模拟工具,为困难的病人讨论","authors":"J. Marshall, M. Brown, Marty Runyan, Dena Higbee","doi":"10.31487/j.acr.2020.01.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient communication during ethical or difficult treatment decisions is a complex interaction. We present \nour initial experience with a structured framework for discussion, SKIPS (setting, knowledge, invitation, \nperception and strategy), as a modification to a previously reported tool for breaking bad news, SPIKES. \nOur new framework emphasizes patient beliefs and wishes in the setting of a discussion requiring ethical \nconsiderations or treatment decisions. Initial evaluations of the SKIPS tool were favourable by resident and \nfaculty, with faculty reporting a greater chance of utilizing SKIPS than the residents.","PeriodicalId":7334,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Computing Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SKIPS: A Simple Modification of a Prior Simulation Tool for Difficult Patient Discussions\",\"authors\":\"J. Marshall, M. Brown, Marty Runyan, Dena Higbee\",\"doi\":\"10.31487/j.acr.2020.01.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patient communication during ethical or difficult treatment decisions is a complex interaction. We present \\nour initial experience with a structured framework for discussion, SKIPS (setting, knowledge, invitation, \\nperception and strategy), as a modification to a previously reported tool for breaking bad news, SPIKES. \\nOur new framework emphasizes patient beliefs and wishes in the setting of a discussion requiring ethical \\nconsiderations or treatment decisions. Initial evaluations of the SKIPS tool were favourable by resident and \\nfaculty, with faculty reporting a greater chance of utilizing SKIPS than the residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Computing Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Computing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.acr.2020.01.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Computing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.acr.2020.01.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在伦理或困难的治疗决策患者沟通是一个复杂的相互作用。我们提出了一个结构化的讨论框架,SKIPS(设置、知识、邀请、感知和策略),作为对先前报道的发布坏消息的工具SPIKES的修改。我们的新框架强调在讨论需要伦理考虑或治疗决定时患者的信念和愿望。对SKIPS工具的初步评估得到了住院医生和教师的支持,教师报告使用SKIPS的机会比住院医生大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SKIPS: A Simple Modification of a Prior Simulation Tool for Difficult Patient Discussions
Patient communication during ethical or difficult treatment decisions is a complex interaction. We present our initial experience with a structured framework for discussion, SKIPS (setting, knowledge, invitation, perception and strategy), as a modification to a previously reported tool for breaking bad news, SPIKES. Our new framework emphasizes patient beliefs and wishes in the setting of a discussion requiring ethical considerations or treatment decisions. Initial evaluations of the SKIPS tool were favourable by resident and faculty, with faculty reporting a greater chance of utilizing SKIPS than the residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信