老年骨科患者联合应用益生菌初级预防难辨梭菌感染可能吗?

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
T. Nagamine
{"title":"老年骨科患者联合应用益生菌初级预防难辨梭菌感染可能吗?","authors":"T. Nagamine","doi":"10.12938/bmfh.19-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nosocomial deep wound infections are serious complications after orthopedic surgery. Extended postoperative antibiotic treatment leads to a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction of surgical site infection [1]. However, antibiotics such as carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones can disturb gastrointestinal microbiota, which may lead to reduced resistance to pathogens such as Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile) [2]. We had carried out postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment mainly with antibiotic-resistant enterococcal probiotics (REP). However, we recently found in a case-control study that combination probiotics may reduce C. difficile infection (CDI) in hip surgery patients [3]. Since then, antibiotic prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery has been performed with combination probiotics including Enterococcus faecium 2×108 CFU/day, Bacillus mesentericus 1×107 CFU/ day, and Clostridium butyricum 5×107 CFU/day. Thus, we compared CDI incidence in hip surgery patients aged over 75 years between before and after the introduction of combination probiotics. The diagnosis of CDI was confirmed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for glutamate dehydrogenase and C. difficile toxins A and B using frozen stool specimens for patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The CDI incidence before the introduction of combination probiotics was 4.2 cases per 10 ,000 patient bed-days, which is as many as in EUCLID (the European, multicentre, prospective biannual point prevalence study of CDI in hospitalized patients with diarrhoea), which reported 7.0 cases per 10, 000 patient bed-days [4]. Surprisingly, the CDI incidence after the introduction of combination probiotics markedly decreased to 0.35 cases per 10 ,000 patient bed-days, while annual consumption of cefmetazole sodium, the main antibiotic agent for prophylaxis usage at our hospital, and the number of hip surgery patients aged over 75 years did not change when compared between before and after the initiation of combination probiotics (Fig. 1). When we administerd antibiotic prophylaxis with R-EP, CDI incidence was the same as in other developed countries. However, since combination probiotics were prescribed routinely, CDI incidence markedly decreased. Even though the data were observational and without a control group, the data may suggest that primary prevention of CDI with combination probiotics is achievable. In an in vivo study, R-EP should less viability and a weeker reduction of luminal pH than conventional enterococcal probiotics (C-EP) due to different utilization of carbohydrates [5]. Moreover, the survival rate of C. butyricum in the presence of antibiotic substances is very high because of its spore-forming effect. A recent experimental study using a new nonlethal diarrheal rat CDI model indicated that C. butyricum exerted a CDIpreventive effect due to suppression of toxin production or toxin activity [6]. In conclusion, the annual CDI incidence at our hospital markedly decreased after the introduction of combination probiotics including C-EP, B. mesentericus, and C. butyricum. CDI prevention among surgical patients is of extreme importance because antibiotic prophylaxis is usually provided after operations in Japan. The efficacy of probiotics for the prevention of CDI is highly controversial [7]. A consensus regarding which probiotic strains might prevent CDI has not been reached. Additional studies of sufficient size and with rigorous designs are needed to confirm which strains and combinations would be beneficial for the prevention of CDI.","PeriodicalId":8867,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"73 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection possible with combination probiotics in elderly orthopedic patients?\",\"authors\":\"T. Nagamine\",\"doi\":\"10.12938/bmfh.19-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nosocomial deep wound infections are serious complications after orthopedic surgery. Extended postoperative antibiotic treatment leads to a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction of surgical site infection [1]. However, antibiotics such as carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones can disturb gastrointestinal microbiota, which may lead to reduced resistance to pathogens such as Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile) [2]. We had carried out postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment mainly with antibiotic-resistant enterococcal probiotics (REP). However, we recently found in a case-control study that combination probiotics may reduce C. difficile infection (CDI) in hip surgery patients [3]. Since then, antibiotic prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery has been performed with combination probiotics including Enterococcus faecium 2×108 CFU/day, Bacillus mesentericus 1×107 CFU/ day, and Clostridium butyricum 5×107 CFU/day. Thus, we compared CDI incidence in hip surgery patients aged over 75 years between before and after the introduction of combination probiotics. The diagnosis of CDI was confirmed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for glutamate dehydrogenase and C. difficile toxins A and B using frozen stool specimens for patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The CDI incidence before the introduction of combination probiotics was 4.2 cases per 10 ,000 patient bed-days, which is as many as in EUCLID (the European, multicentre, prospective biannual point prevalence study of CDI in hospitalized patients with diarrhoea), which reported 7.0 cases per 10, 000 patient bed-days [4]. Surprisingly, the CDI incidence after the introduction of combination probiotics markedly decreased to 0.35 cases per 10 ,000 patient bed-days, while annual consumption of cefmetazole sodium, the main antibiotic agent for prophylaxis usage at our hospital, and the number of hip surgery patients aged over 75 years did not change when compared between before and after the initiation of combination probiotics (Fig. 1). When we administerd antibiotic prophylaxis with R-EP, CDI incidence was the same as in other developed countries. However, since combination probiotics were prescribed routinely, CDI incidence markedly decreased. Even though the data were observational and without a control group, the data may suggest that primary prevention of CDI with combination probiotics is achievable. In an in vivo study, R-EP should less viability and a weeker reduction of luminal pH than conventional enterococcal probiotics (C-EP) due to different utilization of carbohydrates [5]. Moreover, the survival rate of C. butyricum in the presence of antibiotic substances is very high because of its spore-forming effect. A recent experimental study using a new nonlethal diarrheal rat CDI model indicated that C. butyricum exerted a CDIpreventive effect due to suppression of toxin production or toxin activity [6]. In conclusion, the annual CDI incidence at our hospital markedly decreased after the introduction of combination probiotics including C-EP, B. mesentericus, and C. butyricum. CDI prevention among surgical patients is of extreme importance because antibiotic prophylaxis is usually provided after operations in Japan. The efficacy of probiotics for the prevention of CDI is highly controversial [7]. A consensus regarding which probiotic strains might prevent CDI has not been reached. Additional studies of sufficient size and with rigorous designs are needed to confirm which strains and combinations would be beneficial for the prevention of CDI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.19-001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.19-001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

院内深创面感染是骨科手术后的严重并发症。术后延长抗生素治疗可显著减少手术部位感染,具有统计学意义和临床意义[1]。然而,碳青霉烯类、头孢菌素、氟喹诺酮类等抗生素会扰乱胃肠道微生物群,导致对艰难梭菌(clostridiides difficile, Clostridium difficile)等病原体的耐药性降低[2]。术后预防性抗生素治疗主要采用耐药肠球菌益生菌(REP)。然而,我们最近在一项病例对照研究中发现,联合使用益生菌可以减少髋关节手术患者的艰难梭菌感染(CDI)[3]。此后,骨科手术后抗生素预防使用联合益生菌,包括粪肠球菌2×108 CFU/天、肠系膜芽孢杆菌1×107 CFU/天和丁酸梭菌5×107 CFU/天。因此,我们比较了75岁以上髋关节手术患者在引入联合益生菌之前和之后的CDI发病率。对抗生素相关性腹泻患者的冷冻粪便标本进行谷氨酸脱氢酶和艰难梭菌毒素A和B的酶联免疫吸附试验,证实了CDI的诊断。在引入联合益生菌之前,CDI的发病率为4.2例/ 10000病人住院日,与EUCLID(欧洲多中心、前瞻性两年一次的腹泻住院患者CDI点患病率研究)相同,EUCLID报告的CDI发病率为7.0例/ 10000病人住院日[4]。令人惊讶的是,引入联合益生菌后,CDI发病率显著下降至每万患者床日0.35例,而与开始联合益生菌前后相比,我们医院预防使用的主要抗生素头孢美唑钠的年消耗量和75岁以上髋关节手术患者的数量没有变化(图1)。CDI发病率与其他发达国家相同。然而,由于常规使用联合益生菌,CDI发病率明显下降。尽管这些数据是观察性的,没有对照组,但这些数据可能表明,联合益生菌对CDI的一级预防是可以实现的。在体内研究中,由于碳水化合物的利用不同,R-EP比常规肠球菌益生菌(C-EP)的活力更低,一周内肠道pH值降低[5]。此外,由于丁酸梭菌具有孢子形成作用,在抗生素物质存在的情况下,其存活率很高。最近一项采用新型非致死性腹泻大鼠CDI模型的实验研究表明,丁酸梭菌通过抑制毒素产生或抑制毒素活性发挥CDI预防作用[6]。综上所述,在引入C-EP、肠系膜芽孢杆菌、丁酸芽孢杆菌等联合益生菌后,我院每年CDI发病率明显下降。在手术患者中预防CDI非常重要,因为在日本,通常在手术后提供抗生素预防。益生菌预防CDI的功效争议很大[7]。关于哪种益生菌菌株可能预防CDI尚未达成共识。需要进一步进行足够规模和严格设计的研究,以确认哪些菌株和组合对预防CDI有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is primary prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection possible with combination probiotics in elderly orthopedic patients?
Nosocomial deep wound infections are serious complications after orthopedic surgery. Extended postoperative antibiotic treatment leads to a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction of surgical site infection [1]. However, antibiotics such as carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones can disturb gastrointestinal microbiota, which may lead to reduced resistance to pathogens such as Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile) [2]. We had carried out postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment mainly with antibiotic-resistant enterococcal probiotics (REP). However, we recently found in a case-control study that combination probiotics may reduce C. difficile infection (CDI) in hip surgery patients [3]. Since then, antibiotic prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery has been performed with combination probiotics including Enterococcus faecium 2×108 CFU/day, Bacillus mesentericus 1×107 CFU/ day, and Clostridium butyricum 5×107 CFU/day. Thus, we compared CDI incidence in hip surgery patients aged over 75 years between before and after the introduction of combination probiotics. The diagnosis of CDI was confirmed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for glutamate dehydrogenase and C. difficile toxins A and B using frozen stool specimens for patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The CDI incidence before the introduction of combination probiotics was 4.2 cases per 10 ,000 patient bed-days, which is as many as in EUCLID (the European, multicentre, prospective biannual point prevalence study of CDI in hospitalized patients with diarrhoea), which reported 7.0 cases per 10, 000 patient bed-days [4]. Surprisingly, the CDI incidence after the introduction of combination probiotics markedly decreased to 0.35 cases per 10 ,000 patient bed-days, while annual consumption of cefmetazole sodium, the main antibiotic agent for prophylaxis usage at our hospital, and the number of hip surgery patients aged over 75 years did not change when compared between before and after the initiation of combination probiotics (Fig. 1). When we administerd antibiotic prophylaxis with R-EP, CDI incidence was the same as in other developed countries. However, since combination probiotics were prescribed routinely, CDI incidence markedly decreased. Even though the data were observational and without a control group, the data may suggest that primary prevention of CDI with combination probiotics is achievable. In an in vivo study, R-EP should less viability and a weeker reduction of luminal pH than conventional enterococcal probiotics (C-EP) due to different utilization of carbohydrates [5]. Moreover, the survival rate of C. butyricum in the presence of antibiotic substances is very high because of its spore-forming effect. A recent experimental study using a new nonlethal diarrheal rat CDI model indicated that C. butyricum exerted a CDIpreventive effect due to suppression of toxin production or toxin activity [6]. In conclusion, the annual CDI incidence at our hospital markedly decreased after the introduction of combination probiotics including C-EP, B. mesentericus, and C. butyricum. CDI prevention among surgical patients is of extreme importance because antibiotic prophylaxis is usually provided after operations in Japan. The efficacy of probiotics for the prevention of CDI is highly controversial [7]. A consensus regarding which probiotic strains might prevent CDI has not been reached. Additional studies of sufficient size and with rigorous designs are needed to confirm which strains and combinations would be beneficial for the prevention of CDI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health
Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Bioscience of Microbiota, Food and Health (BMFH) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal with a specific area of focus: intestinal microbiota of human and animals, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and food immunology and food function. BMFH contains Full papers, Notes, Reviews and Letters to the editor in all areas dealing with intestinal microbiota, LAB and food immunology and food function. BMFH takes a multidisciplinary approach and focuses on a broad spectrum of issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信