功能安全和工程设计自动化“,

Dwight Howard
{"title":"功能安全和工程设计自动化“,","authors":"Dwight Howard","doi":"10.23919/PANPACIFIC.2019.8696578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety-critical applications have long been a significant and formidable challenge for product development and deployment. This challenge is increasing as more complex technologies are introduced. Sophisticated technologies like Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving (AD) are pacing the capabilities of automated design and development tools. The tremendous effort involved in meeting functional safety standards like ISO 26262 exceeds most staffing levels. Attempting to address this with largely manual effort appears to be virtually impractical. Automating functional safety in product design, development and production processes is essential. For this to be possible, Engineering Design Automation tools must be able to support functional safety compliant design activities. EDA tools suppliers are stepping up to this challenge. EDA tools targeted for functional safety design and compliance verification are gradually coming into the market. It is not clear that these tools can meet the total needs of product design and development. This paper will provide a high-level, general perspective regarding this question.Functional safety standards have broad scope across many industries. The reader is encouraged to explore any industries where functional safety standards are in place. The scope of this paper is limited to automotive applications and, as stated above, the role EDA tools for the design of automotive electronics must fill to meet the challenges functional safety requirements place upon automotive electronics product development processes.","PeriodicalId":6747,"journal":{"name":"2019 Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (Pan Pacific)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Safety and Engineering Design Automation\",\"authors\":\"Dwight Howard\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/PANPACIFIC.2019.8696578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Safety-critical applications have long been a significant and formidable challenge for product development and deployment. This challenge is increasing as more complex technologies are introduced. Sophisticated technologies like Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving (AD) are pacing the capabilities of automated design and development tools. The tremendous effort involved in meeting functional safety standards like ISO 26262 exceeds most staffing levels. Attempting to address this with largely manual effort appears to be virtually impractical. Automating functional safety in product design, development and production processes is essential. For this to be possible, Engineering Design Automation tools must be able to support functional safety compliant design activities. EDA tools suppliers are stepping up to this challenge. EDA tools targeted for functional safety design and compliance verification are gradually coming into the market. It is not clear that these tools can meet the total needs of product design and development. This paper will provide a high-level, general perspective regarding this question.Functional safety standards have broad scope across many industries. The reader is encouraged to explore any industries where functional safety standards are in place. The scope of this paper is limited to automotive applications and, as stated above, the role EDA tools for the design of automotive electronics must fill to meet the challenges functional safety requirements place upon automotive electronics product development processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (Pan Pacific)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (Pan Pacific)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/PANPACIFIC.2019.8696578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Pan Pacific Microelectronics Symposium (Pan Pacific)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PANPACIFIC.2019.8696578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,安全关键型应用一直是产品开发和部署的一个重大而艰巨的挑战。随着更复杂技术的引入,这一挑战正在增加。高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)和自动驾驶(AD)等先进技术正在加快自动化设计和开发工具的能力。在满足ISO 26262等功能安全标准方面所付出的巨大努力超出了大多数人员的水平。试图通过大量的手工工作来解决这个问题似乎实际上是不切实际的。在产品设计、开发和生产过程中自动化功能安全是必不可少的。为了实现这一点,工程设计自动化工具必须能够支持功能安全兼容的设计活动。EDA工具供应商正在加紧应对这一挑战。针对功能安全设计和符合性验证的EDA工具正逐渐进入市场。目前还不清楚这些工具是否能满足产品设计和开发的全部需求。本文将对这个问题提供一个高层次的总体视角。功能安全标准适用于许多行业。我们鼓励读者去探索任何有功能安全标准的行业。本文的范围仅限于汽车应用,如上所述,汽车电子设计的EDA工具必须满足汽车电子产品开发过程中功能安全要求的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Safety and Engineering Design Automation
Safety-critical applications have long been a significant and formidable challenge for product development and deployment. This challenge is increasing as more complex technologies are introduced. Sophisticated technologies like Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving (AD) are pacing the capabilities of automated design and development tools. The tremendous effort involved in meeting functional safety standards like ISO 26262 exceeds most staffing levels. Attempting to address this with largely manual effort appears to be virtually impractical. Automating functional safety in product design, development and production processes is essential. For this to be possible, Engineering Design Automation tools must be able to support functional safety compliant design activities. EDA tools suppliers are stepping up to this challenge. EDA tools targeted for functional safety design and compliance verification are gradually coming into the market. It is not clear that these tools can meet the total needs of product design and development. This paper will provide a high-level, general perspective regarding this question.Functional safety standards have broad scope across many industries. The reader is encouraged to explore any industries where functional safety standards are in place. The scope of this paper is limited to automotive applications and, as stated above, the role EDA tools for the design of automotive electronics must fill to meet the challenges functional safety requirements place upon automotive electronics product development processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信