癌症顺式调控区的突变热点

R. C. Poulos, J. W. Wong
{"title":"癌症顺式调控区的突变热点","authors":"R. C. Poulos, J. W. Wong","doi":"10.18632/oncoscience.325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, somatic mutations in cis-regulatory elements of cancer genomes have become a focus of much research. A landmark discovery occurred in 2013, in which recurrent somatic mutations were identified in the promoter of the key cancer-associated gene, TERT (reviewed in [1]). In the search for other highly recurrent cis-regulatory mutations which may serve as novel driver events, two papers, published in 2014 [2, 3], revealed somewhat surprising results. These studies investigated large cohorts of cancer genomes and found that, despite identifying many recurrent promoter mutations, few could be associated with gene expression changes. Of those that did alter gene expression, many of their target genes did not have strong links to cancer development. We also published similar unexpected findings in a genomewide survey of promoter mutations in the melanoma cellline, COLO829 [4]. The study showed that while some regulatory mutations can alter promoter activity (~17% of mutant promoter regions surveyed), one such mutation that was recurrent (~4.4%) in other melanomas was not associated with altered gene expression in actual cancer samples [4]. Remarkably, we additionally observed that of the 14 remaining promoter mutations surveyed to not alter promoter activity, five mutations were also recurrent in melanoma samples. Together these articles raised the question of why there are such high rates of recurrence among promoter mutations if many do not appear to arise due to their oncogenic ability to alter gene expression.","PeriodicalId":94164,"journal":{"name":"Oncoscience","volume":"4 1","pages":"318 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mutation hotspots in cis-regulatory regions in cancer\",\"authors\":\"R. C. Poulos, J. W. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.18632/oncoscience.325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, somatic mutations in cis-regulatory elements of cancer genomes have become a focus of much research. A landmark discovery occurred in 2013, in which recurrent somatic mutations were identified in the promoter of the key cancer-associated gene, TERT (reviewed in [1]). In the search for other highly recurrent cis-regulatory mutations which may serve as novel driver events, two papers, published in 2014 [2, 3], revealed somewhat surprising results. These studies investigated large cohorts of cancer genomes and found that, despite identifying many recurrent promoter mutations, few could be associated with gene expression changes. Of those that did alter gene expression, many of their target genes did not have strong links to cancer development. We also published similar unexpected findings in a genomewide survey of promoter mutations in the melanoma cellline, COLO829 [4]. The study showed that while some regulatory mutations can alter promoter activity (~17% of mutant promoter regions surveyed), one such mutation that was recurrent (~4.4%) in other melanomas was not associated with altered gene expression in actual cancer samples [4]. Remarkably, we additionally observed that of the 14 remaining promoter mutations surveyed to not alter promoter activity, five mutations were also recurrent in melanoma samples. Together these articles raised the question of why there are such high rates of recurrence among promoter mutations if many do not appear to arise due to their oncogenic ability to alter gene expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncoscience\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"318 - 319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,肿瘤基因组顺式调控元件的体细胞突变已成为研究的热点。一个里程碑式的发现发生在2013年,在关键的癌症相关基因TERT的启动子中发现了复发性体细胞突变([1]综述)。在寻找其他可能作为新驱动事件的高复发性顺式调控突变的过程中,2014年发表的两篇论文[2,3]揭示了一些令人惊讶的结果。这些研究调查了大量的癌症基因组,发现尽管发现了许多复发性启动子突变,但很少与基因表达变化有关。在那些确实改变了基因表达的基因中,许多目标基因与癌症的发展没有很强的联系。我们在黑色素瘤细胞系colo829b[4]启动子突变的全基因组调查中也发表了类似的意外发现。该研究表明,虽然一些调控突变可以改变启动子活性(约17%的突变启动子区域被调查),但在其他黑色素瘤中复发的一种此类突变(约4.4%)与实际癌症样本中基因表达的改变无关。值得注意的是,我们还观察到,在调查的14个未改变启动子活性的剩余启动子突变中,有5个突变在黑色素瘤样本中也会复发。这些文章一起提出了这样一个问题:如果许多启动子突变似乎不是由于它们改变基因表达的致癌能力而出现的,那么为什么启动子突变的复发率如此之高?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mutation hotspots in cis-regulatory regions in cancer
In recent years, somatic mutations in cis-regulatory elements of cancer genomes have become a focus of much research. A landmark discovery occurred in 2013, in which recurrent somatic mutations were identified in the promoter of the key cancer-associated gene, TERT (reviewed in [1]). In the search for other highly recurrent cis-regulatory mutations which may serve as novel driver events, two papers, published in 2014 [2, 3], revealed somewhat surprising results. These studies investigated large cohorts of cancer genomes and found that, despite identifying many recurrent promoter mutations, few could be associated with gene expression changes. Of those that did alter gene expression, many of their target genes did not have strong links to cancer development. We also published similar unexpected findings in a genomewide survey of promoter mutations in the melanoma cellline, COLO829 [4]. The study showed that while some regulatory mutations can alter promoter activity (~17% of mutant promoter regions surveyed), one such mutation that was recurrent (~4.4%) in other melanomas was not associated with altered gene expression in actual cancer samples [4]. Remarkably, we additionally observed that of the 14 remaining promoter mutations surveyed to not alter promoter activity, five mutations were also recurrent in melanoma samples. Together these articles raised the question of why there are such high rates of recurrence among promoter mutations if many do not appear to arise due to their oncogenic ability to alter gene expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信