评论“为什么金融科技没有改变日本银行业”

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Teruo Nakatsuma
{"title":"评论“为什么金融科技没有改变日本银行业”","authors":"Teruo Nakatsuma","doi":"10.1111/aepr.12391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the term “fintech” has now filtered down into everyday language, fintech services have not yet been fully integrated into everyday life, at least in Japan. Iwashita (<span>2022</span>) overviews the current disappointing state of fintech in Japan, assesses which conditions keep fintech services from taking off, and discusses potential “game changers” that would pave the way for fintech services to gain wider acceptance in the coming decade.</p><p>Iwashita (<span>2022</span>) points out two major hindrances to which he attributes the low acceptance of fintech services in Japan; one is related to consumers' attitudes to digital devices and the other is related to corporations' readiness for digital technologies.</p><p>The first hindrance is the hesitation of older people to use digital devices such as personal computers and smartphones. Unlike the younger people who have been using such devices from their childhood, the older people still favor face-to-face communication. Given that the older retired people tend to accumulate more savings than younger working-age people, Japanese banks have an incentive to accommodate those older customers with traditional face-to-face services.</p><p>The second is the unpreparedness or unwillingness of Japanese companies to adopt new digital technologies. Iwashita's (<span>2022</span>) Table 3 compares Japan with three other developed countries (USA, UK, and Germany) in terms of business information and communication technology (ICT) tool usage, which shows that Japanese companies use ICT tools far less than the others in all respects. This does not necessarily mean that Japanese companies did nothing about information technology (IT) investment. Iwashita states that they did reasonably invest in their IT systems for financial accounting, billing, payments, and other accounting tasks, but their systems are mostly for internal use and have little interoperability with the internet. In addition, national and municipal governments face the same problem of legacy IT systems. As a result, Japanese banks need to maintain their traditional channels of financial transactions for the continuation of business relations with private companies as well as government agencies.</p><p>Iwashita (<span>2022</span>), however, claims that the inertia can be broken and fintech services will become more widely accepted in Japan for the following five reasons. First, the global expansion of digital finance. Fintech services are rapidly expanding in emerging economies, and this trend will put pressure on Japanese financial service users. Second, the digitization of government services. Japan's Digital Agency was established on September 1, 2021. It is designed to oversee the digitization of government services at both national and municipal levels, which may ease the Japanese people's fears of the internet, in general, and breaches of privacy, in particular. Third, the shifts in strategic goals of financial institutions. Negative interest rates and a shrinking population are forcing Japanese financial institutions to change their traditional “size matters” strategy. Fourth, the generational shift. The older people who abhor digital devices will be superseded by the next generation who actively use the internet. Fifth, the introduction of mandatory invoices. All businesses will be required to issue invoices for paying the consumption tax in 2023, which will promote electric information exchange among business partners.</p><p>In relation to these reasons, I have several comments and questions on whether and how they will affect the acceptance of fintech services in Japan.</p><p>First, in my opinion, Japan's national identification number, <i>My Number</i>, is the key to the success of the digitization of government services. The Japanese government tries to tag it on health insurance cards, driver's licenses, bank accounts among other items. How widely will the <i>My Number</i> be accepted by the Japanese people? Will it be as ubiquitous as <i>Aadhaar</i> in India? What kind of initiatives must be implemented to achieve this goal?</p><p>Second, Japanese regional banks are struggling for their survival, but it seems that they cannot afford to invest in new IT systems due to a lack of resources. To strengthen the operational foundations of the regional banks, the Japanese government encourages consolidations among them by exempting them from anti-monopoly regulations. Will this policy work?</p><p>Finally, if all transactions among companies are made online, accounting tasks such as billing, payments, and taxation could be fully automated through artificial intelligence, robotic process automation, and other digital technologies in theory. If such a future is coming to Japan, will traditional financial institutions become obsolete and be superseded by digital finance? Can they adapt themselves to those new technologies fast enough?</p>","PeriodicalId":45430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Policy Review","volume":"17 2","pages":"313-314"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aepr.12391","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on “Why Fintech Is Not Changing Japanese Banking”\",\"authors\":\"Teruo Nakatsuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aepr.12391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although the term “fintech” has now filtered down into everyday language, fintech services have not yet been fully integrated into everyday life, at least in Japan. Iwashita (<span>2022</span>) overviews the current disappointing state of fintech in Japan, assesses which conditions keep fintech services from taking off, and discusses potential “game changers” that would pave the way for fintech services to gain wider acceptance in the coming decade.</p><p>Iwashita (<span>2022</span>) points out two major hindrances to which he attributes the low acceptance of fintech services in Japan; one is related to consumers' attitudes to digital devices and the other is related to corporations' readiness for digital technologies.</p><p>The first hindrance is the hesitation of older people to use digital devices such as personal computers and smartphones. Unlike the younger people who have been using such devices from their childhood, the older people still favor face-to-face communication. Given that the older retired people tend to accumulate more savings than younger working-age people, Japanese banks have an incentive to accommodate those older customers with traditional face-to-face services.</p><p>The second is the unpreparedness or unwillingness of Japanese companies to adopt new digital technologies. Iwashita's (<span>2022</span>) Table 3 compares Japan with three other developed countries (USA, UK, and Germany) in terms of business information and communication technology (ICT) tool usage, which shows that Japanese companies use ICT tools far less than the others in all respects. This does not necessarily mean that Japanese companies did nothing about information technology (IT) investment. Iwashita states that they did reasonably invest in their IT systems for financial accounting, billing, payments, and other accounting tasks, but their systems are mostly for internal use and have little interoperability with the internet. In addition, national and municipal governments face the same problem of legacy IT systems. As a result, Japanese banks need to maintain their traditional channels of financial transactions for the continuation of business relations with private companies as well as government agencies.</p><p>Iwashita (<span>2022</span>), however, claims that the inertia can be broken and fintech services will become more widely accepted in Japan for the following five reasons. First, the global expansion of digital finance. Fintech services are rapidly expanding in emerging economies, and this trend will put pressure on Japanese financial service users. Second, the digitization of government services. Japan's Digital Agency was established on September 1, 2021. It is designed to oversee the digitization of government services at both national and municipal levels, which may ease the Japanese people's fears of the internet, in general, and breaches of privacy, in particular. Third, the shifts in strategic goals of financial institutions. Negative interest rates and a shrinking population are forcing Japanese financial institutions to change their traditional “size matters” strategy. Fourth, the generational shift. The older people who abhor digital devices will be superseded by the next generation who actively use the internet. Fifth, the introduction of mandatory invoices. All businesses will be required to issue invoices for paying the consumption tax in 2023, which will promote electric information exchange among business partners.</p><p>In relation to these reasons, I have several comments and questions on whether and how they will affect the acceptance of fintech services in Japan.</p><p>First, in my opinion, Japan's national identification number, <i>My Number</i>, is the key to the success of the digitization of government services. The Japanese government tries to tag it on health insurance cards, driver's licenses, bank accounts among other items. How widely will the <i>My Number</i> be accepted by the Japanese people? Will it be as ubiquitous as <i>Aadhaar</i> in India? What kind of initiatives must be implemented to achieve this goal?</p><p>Second, Japanese regional banks are struggling for their survival, but it seems that they cannot afford to invest in new IT systems due to a lack of resources. To strengthen the operational foundations of the regional banks, the Japanese government encourages consolidations among them by exempting them from anti-monopoly regulations. Will this policy work?</p><p>Finally, if all transactions among companies are made online, accounting tasks such as billing, payments, and taxation could be fully automated through artificial intelligence, robotic process automation, and other digital technologies in theory. If such a future is coming to Japan, will traditional financial institutions become obsolete and be superseded by digital finance? Can they adapt themselves to those new technologies fast enough?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Economic Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"313-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aepr.12391\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Economic Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aepr.12391\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aepr.12391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然“金融科技”一词现在已经渗透到日常语言中,但金融科技服务还没有完全融入日常生活,至少在日本是这样。Iwashita(2022)概述了日本目前令人失望的金融科技状况,评估了哪些条件阻碍了金融科技服务的发展,并讨论了潜在的“游戏规则改变者”,这些改变将为金融科技服务在未来十年获得更广泛的接受铺平道路。Iwashita(2022)指出了日本金融科技服务接受度低的两个主要障碍;一个与消费者对数字设备的态度有关,另一个与企业对数字技术的准备有关。第一个障碍是老年人对使用个人电脑和智能手机等数字设备犹豫不决。不像年轻人从小就开始使用这些设备,老年人仍然喜欢面对面的交流。考虑到老年退休人员往往比年轻的工作年龄人群积累更多的储蓄,日本银行有动力为这些老年客户提供传统的面对面服务。二是日本企业没有准备好或不愿采用新的数字技术。Iwashita的(2022)表3比较了日本与其他三个发达国家(美国、英国和德国)在商业信息和通信技术(ICT)工具使用方面的情况,结果表明,日本公司在所有方面使用ICT工具的次数都远远少于其他国家。这并不一定意味着日本企业在信息技术(IT)投资方面无所作为。Iwashita表示,他们确实合理地投资了他们的IT系统,用于财务会计、计费、支付和其他会计任务,但他们的系统主要用于内部使用,几乎没有与互联网的互操作性。此外,国家和地方政府面临着遗留IT系统的相同问题。因此,日本银行需要保持其传统的金融交易渠道,以继续与私营公司和政府机构保持业务关系。然而,Iwashita(2022)声称,由于以下五个原因,惯性可以被打破,金融科技服务将在日本得到更广泛的接受。一是数字金融的全球扩张。金融科技服务在新兴经济体迅速扩张,这一趋势将给日本金融服务用户带来压力。二是政务服务数字化。日本数码厅成立于2021年9月1日。它旨在监督国家和市级政府服务的数字化,这可能会缓解日本人对互联网的恐惧,尤其是对侵犯隐私的恐惧。三是金融机构战略目标的转变。负利率和人口萎缩正迫使日本金融机构改变其传统的“规模问题”策略。第四,代际转换。讨厌数字设备的老年人将被积极使用互联网的下一代所取代。第五,实行强制性发票。从2023年开始,所有企业都将被要求开具消费税发票,这将促进商业伙伴之间的电子信息交换。关于这些原因,我有一些评论和问题,关于它们是否以及如何影响日本对金融科技服务的接受。首先,在我看来,日本的国民身份证号码“我的号码”是政府服务数字化成功的关键。日本政府试图在医疗保险卡、驾照、银行账户等物品上贴上标签。“我的号码”会在多大程度上被日本人接受?它会像印度的Aadhaar一样无处不在吗?要实现这一目标,必须采取哪些措施?第二,日本的地方银行正在为生存而挣扎,但由于缺乏资源,它们似乎无力投资新的it系统。为了加强地区银行的经营基础,日本政府通过免除反垄断法,鼓励地区银行之间的合并。这项政策会奏效吗?最后,如果公司之间的所有交易都在网上进行,那么计费、支付和税收等会计任务可以通过人工智能、机器人流程自动化和其他数字技术在理论上完全自动化。如果这样的未来来到日本,传统金融机构是否会过时,被数字金融所取代?他们能足够快地适应这些新技术吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment on “Why Fintech Is Not Changing Japanese Banking”

Although the term “fintech” has now filtered down into everyday language, fintech services have not yet been fully integrated into everyday life, at least in Japan. Iwashita (2022) overviews the current disappointing state of fintech in Japan, assesses which conditions keep fintech services from taking off, and discusses potential “game changers” that would pave the way for fintech services to gain wider acceptance in the coming decade.

Iwashita (2022) points out two major hindrances to which he attributes the low acceptance of fintech services in Japan; one is related to consumers' attitudes to digital devices and the other is related to corporations' readiness for digital technologies.

The first hindrance is the hesitation of older people to use digital devices such as personal computers and smartphones. Unlike the younger people who have been using such devices from their childhood, the older people still favor face-to-face communication. Given that the older retired people tend to accumulate more savings than younger working-age people, Japanese banks have an incentive to accommodate those older customers with traditional face-to-face services.

The second is the unpreparedness or unwillingness of Japanese companies to adopt new digital technologies. Iwashita's (2022) Table 3 compares Japan with three other developed countries (USA, UK, and Germany) in terms of business information and communication technology (ICT) tool usage, which shows that Japanese companies use ICT tools far less than the others in all respects. This does not necessarily mean that Japanese companies did nothing about information technology (IT) investment. Iwashita states that they did reasonably invest in their IT systems for financial accounting, billing, payments, and other accounting tasks, but their systems are mostly for internal use and have little interoperability with the internet. In addition, national and municipal governments face the same problem of legacy IT systems. As a result, Japanese banks need to maintain their traditional channels of financial transactions for the continuation of business relations with private companies as well as government agencies.

Iwashita (2022), however, claims that the inertia can be broken and fintech services will become more widely accepted in Japan for the following five reasons. First, the global expansion of digital finance. Fintech services are rapidly expanding in emerging economies, and this trend will put pressure on Japanese financial service users. Second, the digitization of government services. Japan's Digital Agency was established on September 1, 2021. It is designed to oversee the digitization of government services at both national and municipal levels, which may ease the Japanese people's fears of the internet, in general, and breaches of privacy, in particular. Third, the shifts in strategic goals of financial institutions. Negative interest rates and a shrinking population are forcing Japanese financial institutions to change their traditional “size matters” strategy. Fourth, the generational shift. The older people who abhor digital devices will be superseded by the next generation who actively use the internet. Fifth, the introduction of mandatory invoices. All businesses will be required to issue invoices for paying the consumption tax in 2023, which will promote electric information exchange among business partners.

In relation to these reasons, I have several comments and questions on whether and how they will affect the acceptance of fintech services in Japan.

First, in my opinion, Japan's national identification number, My Number, is the key to the success of the digitization of government services. The Japanese government tries to tag it on health insurance cards, driver's licenses, bank accounts among other items. How widely will the My Number be accepted by the Japanese people? Will it be as ubiquitous as Aadhaar in India? What kind of initiatives must be implemented to achieve this goal?

Second, Japanese regional banks are struggling for their survival, but it seems that they cannot afford to invest in new IT systems due to a lack of resources. To strengthen the operational foundations of the regional banks, the Japanese government encourages consolidations among them by exempting them from anti-monopoly regulations. Will this policy work?

Finally, if all transactions among companies are made online, accounting tasks such as billing, payments, and taxation could be fully automated through artificial intelligence, robotic process automation, and other digital technologies in theory. If such a future is coming to Japan, will traditional financial institutions become obsolete and be superseded by digital finance? Can they adapt themselves to those new technologies fast enough?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The goal of the Asian Economic Policy Review is to become an intellectual voice on the current issues of international economics and economic policy, based on comprehensive and in-depth analyses, with a primary focus on Asia. Emphasis is placed on identifying key issues at the time - spanning international trade, international finance, the environment, energy, the integration of regional economies and other issues - in order to furnish ideas and proposals to contribute positively to the policy debate in the region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信