输卵管造影,评价急性胆囊炎胆囊造瘘术后引流的有用调查,单中心经验

Badreldin Mohamed, George Simmons, Khalid M. Bhatti, S. Taha, Abdalla Hassan, Muhammad Chauhan, S. Babikir, M. Mohamed, D. Mirghani, R. Canelo
{"title":"输卵管造影,评价急性胆囊炎胆囊造瘘术后引流的有用调查,单中心经验","authors":"Badreldin Mohamed, George Simmons, Khalid M. Bhatti, S. Taha, Abdalla Hassan, Muhammad Chauhan, S. Babikir, M. Mohamed, D. Mirghani, R. Canelo","doi":"10.59657/2837-8172.brs.23.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for cholecystitis. However, for co-morbid or unstable patients, a less invasive approach can be adopted such as cholecystostomy drain (CD) insertion. CD can be a bridging operation or can be used as a definitive treatment if patient unsuitable for surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had Tubogram at Cumberland Infirmary, post CD for non-malignant cause between January 2019 and January 2022, comparing their outcome with the patients who did not undergo tubogram investigation. Patient data list collected from information department, Cumberland Infirmary. Results: Cholecystostomy drain placed for 58 patients; 21 patient (36.21%) had tubogram. Of the 58,44 patients (75.86%) had one CD; only 10 patients (22.73%) of them had tubogram. 14 patients had more than one CD (11 patient of them had tubogram). 66.67% patients had tubogram at 3-4 weeks following CD insertion. Outcome of tubogram patients was 47.62% (n=10) had Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) 6 weeks after cholecystostomy drain removal and 28.57% (n=6) had Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography then Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Non-tubogram patients’ group had more visits to same day emergency clinic comparing to tubogram patients’ group. Conclusion: Tubogram is a useful, cheap, non-invasive test linked with lower recurrence rate of cholecystitis symptoms after removal of CD; it is also associated with earlier CD removal. We recommend that tubogram should be a routine investigation for all patients three to four weeks post CD insertion.","PeriodicalId":13694,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tubogram, A Useful Investigation for Evaluation of Patients Post Cholecystostomy Drain for Acute Cholecystitis, Single Centre Experience\",\"authors\":\"Badreldin Mohamed, George Simmons, Khalid M. Bhatti, S. Taha, Abdalla Hassan, Muhammad Chauhan, S. Babikir, M. Mohamed, D. Mirghani, R. Canelo\",\"doi\":\"10.59657/2837-8172.brs.23.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for cholecystitis. However, for co-morbid or unstable patients, a less invasive approach can be adopted such as cholecystostomy drain (CD) insertion. CD can be a bridging operation or can be used as a definitive treatment if patient unsuitable for surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had Tubogram at Cumberland Infirmary, post CD for non-malignant cause between January 2019 and January 2022, comparing their outcome with the patients who did not undergo tubogram investigation. Patient data list collected from information department, Cumberland Infirmary. Results: Cholecystostomy drain placed for 58 patients; 21 patient (36.21%) had tubogram. Of the 58,44 patients (75.86%) had one CD; only 10 patients (22.73%) of them had tubogram. 14 patients had more than one CD (11 patient of them had tubogram). 66.67% patients had tubogram at 3-4 weeks following CD insertion. Outcome of tubogram patients was 47.62% (n=10) had Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) 6 weeks after cholecystostomy drain removal and 28.57% (n=6) had Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography then Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Non-tubogram patients’ group had more visits to same day emergency clinic comparing to tubogram patients’ group. Conclusion: Tubogram is a useful, cheap, non-invasive test linked with lower recurrence rate of cholecystitis symptoms after removal of CD; it is also associated with earlier CD removal. We recommend that tubogram should be a routine investigation for all patients three to four weeks post CD insertion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59657/2837-8172.brs.23.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59657/2837-8172.brs.23.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是治疗胆囊炎的金标准。然而,对于合并症或不稳定的患者,可以采用侵入性较小的方法,如胆囊造口引流管(CD)插入。CD可以作为一种桥接手术,如果患者不适合手术,也可以作为一种明确的治疗方法。方法:回顾性研究2019年1月至2022年1月在坎伯兰医院(Cumberland hospital)接受非恶性原因CD后输卵管造影检查的患者,将其结果与未接受输卵管造影检查的患者进行比较。从坎伯兰医院信息部收集的患者数据列表。结果:胆囊造口引流58例;输卵管造影21例(36.21%)。58例患者中,44例(75.86%)有1例CD;其中仅有10例(22.73%)行输卵管造影。14例有1个以上CD(其中11例有输卵管造影)。66.67%的患者在CD插入后3-4周行输卵管造影。输卵管造影患者中,47.62% (n=10)在胆囊造瘘6周后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC), 28.57% (n=6)行内镜逆行胆管造影后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。非输卵管造影组当日急诊就诊次数高于输卵管造影组。结论:输卵管造影是一种实用、廉价、无创的检查方法,胆囊切除术后胆囊炎症状复发率较低;它也与早期的乳糜泻清除有关。我们建议所有患者在CD插入后3 - 4周进行输卵管造影检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tubogram, A Useful Investigation for Evaluation of Patients Post Cholecystostomy Drain for Acute Cholecystitis, Single Centre Experience
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for cholecystitis. However, for co-morbid or unstable patients, a less invasive approach can be adopted such as cholecystostomy drain (CD) insertion. CD can be a bridging operation or can be used as a definitive treatment if patient unsuitable for surgery. Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had Tubogram at Cumberland Infirmary, post CD for non-malignant cause between January 2019 and January 2022, comparing their outcome with the patients who did not undergo tubogram investigation. Patient data list collected from information department, Cumberland Infirmary. Results: Cholecystostomy drain placed for 58 patients; 21 patient (36.21%) had tubogram. Of the 58,44 patients (75.86%) had one CD; only 10 patients (22.73%) of them had tubogram. 14 patients had more than one CD (11 patient of them had tubogram). 66.67% patients had tubogram at 3-4 weeks following CD insertion. Outcome of tubogram patients was 47.62% (n=10) had Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) 6 weeks after cholecystostomy drain removal and 28.57% (n=6) had Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography then Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Non-tubogram patients’ group had more visits to same day emergency clinic comparing to tubogram patients’ group. Conclusion: Tubogram is a useful, cheap, non-invasive test linked with lower recurrence rate of cholecystitis symptoms after removal of CD; it is also associated with earlier CD removal. We recommend that tubogram should be a routine investigation for all patients three to four weeks post CD insertion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信