澳大利亚语言中的连词和从句连接

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ellison Luk, Jean-Christophe Verstraete
{"title":"澳大利亚语言中的连词和从句连接","authors":"Ellison Luk, Jean-Christophe Verstraete","doi":"10.1075/sl.20055.luk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyses the role of conjunctions in clause linkage in Australian languages. Conjunctions are seemingly\n straightforward clause-linking devices, but they remain under-studied, both for Australian languages and from a broader\n typological perspective. In this study, we propose a functional definition of conjunctions, as set against other resources for\n clause linkage. We show that this captures not just the prototypical free-standing elements (the equivalents of if, because, but\n etc.), but also various types of bound markers with a similar function (bound to clause-scoping positions or predicates). We\n survey the role of conjunctions in a representative sample of 53 Australian languages, showing that they are not a marginal clause\n linkage resource in Australia, as seems to be assumed in the relevant literature, but often form a major category within clause\n linkage systems. We also identify a number of areal patterns, based on the size of conjunction inventories and their\n morphosyntactic features.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conjunctions and clause linkage in Australian languages\",\"authors\":\"Ellison Luk, Jean-Christophe Verstraete\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/sl.20055.luk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study analyses the role of conjunctions in clause linkage in Australian languages. Conjunctions are seemingly\\n straightforward clause-linking devices, but they remain under-studied, both for Australian languages and from a broader\\n typological perspective. In this study, we propose a functional definition of conjunctions, as set against other resources for\\n clause linkage. We show that this captures not just the prototypical free-standing elements (the equivalents of if, because, but\\n etc.), but also various types of bound markers with a similar function (bound to clause-scoping positions or predicates). We\\n survey the role of conjunctions in a representative sample of 53 Australian languages, showing that they are not a marginal clause\\n linkage resource in Australia, as seems to be assumed in the relevant literature, but often form a major category within clause\\n linkage systems. We also identify a number of areal patterns, based on the size of conjunction inventories and their\\n morphosyntactic features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Language\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20055.luk\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20055.luk","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了连词在澳大利亚语从句连接中的作用。连词似乎是简单的从句连接手段,但无论是对澳大利亚语言还是从更广泛的类型学角度来看,连词都还没有得到充分的研究。在本研究中,我们提出了连词的功能定义,作为对其他资源的子句连接。我们表明,这不仅捕获了典型的独立元素(相当于if、because、but等),还捕获了具有类似功能的各种类型的绑定标记(绑定到子句作用域位置或谓词)。我们在53种澳大利亚语言的代表性样本中调查了连词的作用,表明它们在澳大利亚并不是一个边缘的从句连接资源,正如相关文献中所假设的那样,而是经常在从句连接系统中形成一个主要类别。我们还根据连接清单的大小及其形态句法特征确定了一些面积模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conjunctions and clause linkage in Australian languages
This study analyses the role of conjunctions in clause linkage in Australian languages. Conjunctions are seemingly straightforward clause-linking devices, but they remain under-studied, both for Australian languages and from a broader typological perspective. In this study, we propose a functional definition of conjunctions, as set against other resources for clause linkage. We show that this captures not just the prototypical free-standing elements (the equivalents of if, because, but etc.), but also various types of bound markers with a similar function (bound to clause-scoping positions or predicates). We survey the role of conjunctions in a representative sample of 53 Australian languages, showing that they are not a marginal clause linkage resource in Australia, as seems to be assumed in the relevant literature, but often form a major category within clause linkage systems. We also identify a number of areal patterns, based on the size of conjunction inventories and their morphosyntactic features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信