橡胶小农不同除草方式对土壤大型动物多样性和杂草动态的影响

I. Chaniago, Yulistriani Yulistriani, I. M. Umami, Zam Z. Bukhari
{"title":"橡胶小农不同除草方式对土壤大型动物多样性和杂草动态的影响","authors":"I. Chaniago, Yulistriani Yulistriani, I. M. Umami, Zam Z. Bukhari","doi":"10.13057/biodiv/d240602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Chaniago I, Yulistriani, Umami IM, Bukhari ZZ. 2023. Soil macrofauna diversity and weed dynamics in response to different methods of weed control in smallholder rubber farming. Biodiversitas 24: 3106-3113. Weeds interference in rubber farmland may reduce latex yield. Farmers apply herbicides to control weeds. However, the herbicide not only controls weed but also affects the presence of soil macrofauna. A study has been conducted to determine the effect of different method of weed control on soil macrofauna and weeds at smallholder rubber farming at Pulau Punjung, Dharmasraya District, West Sumatra, Indonesia. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized block design with 6 treatments and 4 pseudo-replications. Treatment was mechanical control, without weed control, and 4 doses of herbicide glyphosate+metsulfuron-methyl (1.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1) with 400 L ha-1 of volume. Pitfall traps were used to collect the soil macrofauna. Data were analysis with ANOVA for weed and soil macrofauna in response to different methods of weed control. Results demonstrated that the application of glyphosate+metsulfuron-methyl herbicide significantly suppressed weeds higher than that of other methods of weed control (p<0.05). Para grass (Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf) was the most dominant weed but has been affected most by 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1 herbicide mixture. Soil macrofauna of the order Hemiptera was affected most by the application of herbicide with a total reduction of 71.58% of number of individuals at 12 weeks after application of herbicide. In general, different weed control methods resulted in varied numbers of orders and individuals of the soil macrofauna.","PeriodicalId":8801,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil macrofauna diversity and weed dynamics in response to different methods of weed control in smallholder rubber farming\",\"authors\":\"I. Chaniago, Yulistriani Yulistriani, I. M. Umami, Zam Z. Bukhari\",\"doi\":\"10.13057/biodiv/d240602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Chaniago I, Yulistriani, Umami IM, Bukhari ZZ. 2023. Soil macrofauna diversity and weed dynamics in response to different methods of weed control in smallholder rubber farming. Biodiversitas 24: 3106-3113. Weeds interference in rubber farmland may reduce latex yield. Farmers apply herbicides to control weeds. However, the herbicide not only controls weed but also affects the presence of soil macrofauna. A study has been conducted to determine the effect of different method of weed control on soil macrofauna and weeds at smallholder rubber farming at Pulau Punjung, Dharmasraya District, West Sumatra, Indonesia. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized block design with 6 treatments and 4 pseudo-replications. Treatment was mechanical control, without weed control, and 4 doses of herbicide glyphosate+metsulfuron-methyl (1.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1) with 400 L ha-1 of volume. Pitfall traps were used to collect the soil macrofauna. Data were analysis with ANOVA for weed and soil macrofauna in response to different methods of weed control. Results demonstrated that the application of glyphosate+metsulfuron-methyl herbicide significantly suppressed weeds higher than that of other methods of weed control (p<0.05). Para grass (Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf) was the most dominant weed but has been affected most by 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1 herbicide mixture. Soil macrofauna of the order Hemiptera was affected most by the application of herbicide with a total reduction of 71.58% of number of individuals at 12 weeks after application of herbicide. In general, different weed control methods resulted in varied numbers of orders and individuals of the soil macrofauna.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要张建军,刘建军,刘建军。2008。橡胶小农不同除草方式对土壤大型动物多样性和杂草动态的影响。生物多样性24:3106-3113。橡胶田杂草干扰会导致乳胶产量下降。农民使用除草剂控制杂草。然而,除草剂不仅控制杂草,而且影响土壤大型动物的存在。在印度尼西亚西苏门答腊岛Dharmasraya地区Pulau Punjung进行了一项研究,以确定不同的杂草控制方法对小型橡胶农场土壤大型动物和杂草的影响。试验采用完全随机区组设计,6个处理,4个假重复。处理为机械对照,不除杂草,4剂量草甘膦+甲磺隆-甲基除草剂(1.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1),体积为400 L ha-1。采用诱捕法采集土壤大型动物。采用方差分析方法对不同杂草防治方法对杂草和土壤大型动物的影响进行分析。结果表明,施用草甘膦+甲磺隆-甲基除草剂对杂草的抑制作用显著高于其他除草方法(p<0.05)。对生草(Brachiaria mutica)3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1混合除草剂对其影响最大。除草剂对半翅目土壤大型动物的影响最大,施用12周后总个体数减少71.58%。总的来说,不同的杂草控制方法导致土壤大型动物的目数和个体数不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil macrofauna diversity and weed dynamics in response to different methods of weed control in smallholder rubber farming
Abstract. Chaniago I, Yulistriani, Umami IM, Bukhari ZZ. 2023. Soil macrofauna diversity and weed dynamics in response to different methods of weed control in smallholder rubber farming. Biodiversitas 24: 3106-3113. Weeds interference in rubber farmland may reduce latex yield. Farmers apply herbicides to control weeds. However, the herbicide not only controls weed but also affects the presence of soil macrofauna. A study has been conducted to determine the effect of different method of weed control on soil macrofauna and weeds at smallholder rubber farming at Pulau Punjung, Dharmasraya District, West Sumatra, Indonesia. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized block design with 6 treatments and 4 pseudo-replications. Treatment was mechanical control, without weed control, and 4 doses of herbicide glyphosate+metsulfuron-methyl (1.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 2.5 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1, 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1) with 400 L ha-1 of volume. Pitfall traps were used to collect the soil macrofauna. Data were analysis with ANOVA for weed and soil macrofauna in response to different methods of weed control. Results demonstrated that the application of glyphosate+metsulfuron-methyl herbicide significantly suppressed weeds higher than that of other methods of weed control (p<0.05). Para grass (Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf) was the most dominant weed but has been affected most by 3 L ha-1 + 15 g ha-1 herbicide mixture. Soil macrofauna of the order Hemiptera was affected most by the application of herbicide with a total reduction of 71.58% of number of individuals at 12 weeks after application of herbicide. In general, different weed control methods resulted in varied numbers of orders and individuals of the soil macrofauna.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信