山参水提物与0.12%氯己定对变形链球菌体外抑菌效果的比较研究

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Madhivathani S M, U. K., Sangeeta Chavan, P. R., P. P.
{"title":"山参水提物与0.12%氯己定对变形链球菌体外抑菌效果的比较研究","authors":"Madhivathani S M, U. K., Sangeeta Chavan, P. R., P. P.","doi":"10.56501/intjcommunitydent.v11i2.867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim and objectives: To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of various concentration of C.sappan wood aqueous extract (100mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 300mg/ml, 400mg/ml, 500mg/ml and 600mg/ml) and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash using agar well diffusion method against St.mutans.\nMaterials and Methods: A comparative experimental invitro study was conducted to evaluate and compare antimicrobial activity of various concentration of C.Sappan aqueous extract and 0.12% Chlorhexidine. The study enclosed extract of 100mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 300mg/ml, 400mg/ml, 500mg/ml, 600mg/ml and 0.12% Chlorhexidine as control. The antimicrobial activity was assessed by agar well diffusion method, were 50µl of each concentration was poured in the prepared agar well and assessed for zone of inhibition.\nResults: The antimicrobial potential of test compounds was estimated by measuring the zone of inhibition and all the procedure are done in triplicates and values are assessed using One way ANOVA and Post Hoc analysis. All the concentration used showed zone of inhibition against St.mutans. At the concentration, 600mg/ml of aqueous C.sappan extract have a larger zone of inhibition (22.41±.32). In agar well diffusion method, at the minimal concentration of 600mg/ml and C.Sappan aqueous extract was comparatively better than positive control group (0.12%cholorhexidine).\nConclusion: C.Sappan wood aqueous extract could be preferred for routine oral hygiene practice where it can provide maximal antimicrobial effect without side effects of routine aid.","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of anti-bacterial effect of Caesalpinia sappan aqueous extract and 0.12% Chlorhexidine against Streptococcus mutans – An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Madhivathani S M, U. K., Sangeeta Chavan, P. R., P. P.\",\"doi\":\"10.56501/intjcommunitydent.v11i2.867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim and objectives: To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of various concentration of C.sappan wood aqueous extract (100mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 300mg/ml, 400mg/ml, 500mg/ml and 600mg/ml) and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash using agar well diffusion method against St.mutans.\\nMaterials and Methods: A comparative experimental invitro study was conducted to evaluate and compare antimicrobial activity of various concentration of C.Sappan aqueous extract and 0.12% Chlorhexidine. The study enclosed extract of 100mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 300mg/ml, 400mg/ml, 500mg/ml, 600mg/ml and 0.12% Chlorhexidine as control. The antimicrobial activity was assessed by agar well diffusion method, were 50µl of each concentration was poured in the prepared agar well and assessed for zone of inhibition.\\nResults: The antimicrobial potential of test compounds was estimated by measuring the zone of inhibition and all the procedure are done in triplicates and values are assessed using One way ANOVA and Post Hoc analysis. All the concentration used showed zone of inhibition against St.mutans. At the concentration, 600mg/ml of aqueous C.sappan extract have a larger zone of inhibition (22.41±.32). In agar well diffusion method, at the minimal concentration of 600mg/ml and C.Sappan aqueous extract was comparatively better than positive control group (0.12%cholorhexidine).\\nConclusion: C.Sappan wood aqueous extract could be preferred for routine oral hygiene practice where it can provide maximal antimicrobial effect without side effects of routine aid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjcommunitydent.v11i2.867\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56501/intjcommunitydent.v11i2.867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用琼脂孔扩散法评价和比较不同浓度的菝葜木水提物(100mg/ml、200mg/ml、300mg/ml、400mg/ml、500mg/ml、600mg/ml)和0.12%氯己定漱口水对葡萄球菌的抑菌活性。材料与方法:采用体外对照实验研究,评价和比较不同浓度菝葜木水提物和0.12%氯己定的抑菌活性。本研究采用100mg/ml、200mg/ml、300mg/ml、400mg/ml、500mg/ml、600mg/ml和0.12%氯己定提取物作为对照。采用琼脂孔扩散法测定其抑菌活性,将每种浓度的50µl倒入制备好的琼脂孔中进行抑菌区测定。结果:测试化合物的抗菌潜力是通过测量抑制区来估计的,所有的过程都是三次完成的,并使用单向方差分析和事后分析来评估价值。所有浓度对St.mutans均有抑制作用。在600mg/ml的浓度下,菝葜水提物具有更大的抑制区(22.41±0.32)。琼脂孔扩散法中,最小浓度为600mg/ml时,菝葜水提物的抑菌效果明显优于阳性对照组(0.12%氯己定)。结论:三番木水提物可作为常规口腔卫生的首选,其抗菌效果最大,且无常规辅助的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of anti-bacterial effect of Caesalpinia sappan aqueous extract and 0.12% Chlorhexidine against Streptococcus mutans – An in vitro study
Aim and objectives: To evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of various concentration of C.sappan wood aqueous extract (100mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 300mg/ml, 400mg/ml, 500mg/ml and 600mg/ml) and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash using agar well diffusion method against St.mutans. Materials and Methods: A comparative experimental invitro study was conducted to evaluate and compare antimicrobial activity of various concentration of C.Sappan aqueous extract and 0.12% Chlorhexidine. The study enclosed extract of 100mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 300mg/ml, 400mg/ml, 500mg/ml, 600mg/ml and 0.12% Chlorhexidine as control. The antimicrobial activity was assessed by agar well diffusion method, were 50µl of each concentration was poured in the prepared agar well and assessed for zone of inhibition. Results: The antimicrobial potential of test compounds was estimated by measuring the zone of inhibition and all the procedure are done in triplicates and values are assessed using One way ANOVA and Post Hoc analysis. All the concentration used showed zone of inhibition against St.mutans. At the concentration, 600mg/ml of aqueous C.sappan extract have a larger zone of inhibition (22.41±.32). In agar well diffusion method, at the minimal concentration of 600mg/ml and C.Sappan aqueous extract was comparatively better than positive control group (0.12%cholorhexidine). Conclusion: C.Sappan wood aqueous extract could be preferred for routine oral hygiene practice where it can provide maximal antimicrobial effect without side effects of routine aid.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信