2017年1月至2018年2月加拿大多伦多一起大型社区青年流行性腮腺炎疫情调查与管理

V. Dubey, O. Ozaldin, L. Shulman, R. Stuart, J. Maclachlan, L. Bromley, A. Summers
{"title":"2017年1月至2018年2月加拿大多伦多一起大型社区青年流行性腮腺炎疫情调查与管理","authors":"V. Dubey, O. Ozaldin, L. Shulman, R. Stuart, J. Maclachlan, L. Bromley, A. Summers","doi":"10.14745/CCDR.V44I12A01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nIn 2017, a mumps outbreak was identified in a cohort of 18-34 year olds in Toronto, Canada.\n\n\nObjective\nTo describe a large community mumps outbreak in an urban centre from January 2017 to February 2018 among young adults.\n\n\nMethods\nA broad range of interventions were implemented in an attempt to reach the target audience; including case and contact management, vaccination clinics at schools and clinicians' offices, school exclusions, bar inspections, traditional communication strategies (including health care provider updates and posters) and newer communication strategies (including three sequential social media campaigns).\n\n\nResults\nA total of 143 cases of mumps were identified. Although cases' ages ranged from three to 72 years, most (76%) were 18-34 year olds, many of whom had frequented bars and local food establishments in downtown Toronto. 84% (n=120) of the cases were community-acquired. Only 16% (n=23) of the cases reported exposures in schools and post-secondary school institutions. Of those, 39% (n=56) of cases had an unknown vaccination history; 34% (n=49) were either not vaccinated or partially vaccinated with one dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine; and 27% (n=38) had received the recommended two doses of mumps vaccine. Determining vaccination status was a challenge, in part due to the lack of a registry. Vaccination was recommended when subjects were known to have had fewer than two doses of vaccine or had an unknown vaccination status. A social media campaign, emphasizing the risk of social activities if not protected from the mumps, yielded over 500,000 impressions from Facebook and Twitter messages and ads and an impressive engagement rate of between 1% and 10x%.\n\n\nConclusion\nThis was the largest mumps outbreak in Toronto in over 20 years. Among young adults, ongoing social media and traditional communication campaigns can contribute to the control of community mumps outbreaks. Encouraging vaccine uptake is desirable, but without a vaccine registry it is difficult to assess vaccination coverage among adults. Susceptible cohorts of young adults who were not adequately vaccinated pose a risk for future outbreaks. Given that almost 30% of the mumps cases were fully vaccinated with two doses of mumps-containing vaccine, even two doses may not provide complete protection.","PeriodicalId":94304,"journal":{"name":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","volume":"21 1","pages":"309-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation and management of a large community mumps outbreak among young adults in Toronto, Canada, January 2017-February 2018.\",\"authors\":\"V. Dubey, O. Ozaldin, L. Shulman, R. Stuart, J. Maclachlan, L. Bromley, A. Summers\",\"doi\":\"10.14745/CCDR.V44I12A01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nIn 2017, a mumps outbreak was identified in a cohort of 18-34 year olds in Toronto, Canada.\\n\\n\\nObjective\\nTo describe a large community mumps outbreak in an urban centre from January 2017 to February 2018 among young adults.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nA broad range of interventions were implemented in an attempt to reach the target audience; including case and contact management, vaccination clinics at schools and clinicians' offices, school exclusions, bar inspections, traditional communication strategies (including health care provider updates and posters) and newer communication strategies (including three sequential social media campaigns).\\n\\n\\nResults\\nA total of 143 cases of mumps were identified. Although cases' ages ranged from three to 72 years, most (76%) were 18-34 year olds, many of whom had frequented bars and local food establishments in downtown Toronto. 84% (n=120) of the cases were community-acquired. Only 16% (n=23) of the cases reported exposures in schools and post-secondary school institutions. Of those, 39% (n=56) of cases had an unknown vaccination history; 34% (n=49) were either not vaccinated or partially vaccinated with one dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine; and 27% (n=38) had received the recommended two doses of mumps vaccine. Determining vaccination status was a challenge, in part due to the lack of a registry. Vaccination was recommended when subjects were known to have had fewer than two doses of vaccine or had an unknown vaccination status. A social media campaign, emphasizing the risk of social activities if not protected from the mumps, yielded over 500,000 impressions from Facebook and Twitter messages and ads and an impressive engagement rate of between 1% and 10x%.\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nThis was the largest mumps outbreak in Toronto in over 20 years. Among young adults, ongoing social media and traditional communication campaigns can contribute to the control of community mumps outbreaks. Encouraging vaccine uptake is desirable, but without a vaccine registry it is difficult to assess vaccination coverage among adults. Susceptible cohorts of young adults who were not adequately vaccinated pose a risk for future outbreaks. Given that almost 30% of the mumps cases were fully vaccinated with two doses of mumps-containing vaccine, even two doses may not provide complete protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"309-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14745/CCDR.V44I12A01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14745/CCDR.V44I12A01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

2017年,在加拿大多伦多的18-34岁人群中发现了一次腮腺炎疫情。目的描述2017年1月至2018年2月在某城市中心年轻人中发生的大规模社区腮腺炎疫情。方法实施了广泛的干预措施,试图达到目标受众;包括病例和接触者管理、学校和临床医生办公室的疫苗接种诊所、学校排斥、酒吧检查、传统的沟通策略(包括卫生保健提供者更新和海报)和较新的沟通策略(包括三个连续的社交媒体活动)。结果共检出腮腺炎143例。虽然病例的年龄从3岁到72岁不等,但大多数(76%)是18-34岁,其中许多人经常光顾多伦多市中心的酒吧和当地食品场所。84% (n=120)的病例是社区获得的。只有16% (n=23)的病例报告在学校和高等教育机构接触。其中,39% (n=56)的病例有未知的疫苗接种史;34% (n=49)未接种或部分接种一剂麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗;27% (n=38)接种了推荐的两剂腮腺炎疫苗。确定疫苗接种状况是一项挑战,部分原因是缺乏登记。当已知受试者接种了少于两剂疫苗或接种情况不明时,建议接种疫苗。一项社交媒体宣传活动强调,如果不预防腮腺炎,社交活动就会有风险,Facebook和Twitter的信息和广告产生了超过50万的印象,参与率在1%到10%之间,令人印象深刻。结论这是多伦多市20多年来最大的一次流行性腮腺炎暴发。在年轻人中,正在进行的社交媒体和传统传播运动可有助于控制社区流行性腮腺炎暴发。鼓励疫苗接种是可取的,但没有疫苗登记,很难评估成人的疫苗接种覆盖率。未充分接种疫苗的年轻成人易感人群对未来的疫情构成风险。鉴于近30%的腮腺炎病例接种了两剂含腮腺炎疫苗,即使两剂也可能无法提供完全保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation and management of a large community mumps outbreak among young adults in Toronto, Canada, January 2017-February 2018.
Background In 2017, a mumps outbreak was identified in a cohort of 18-34 year olds in Toronto, Canada. Objective To describe a large community mumps outbreak in an urban centre from January 2017 to February 2018 among young adults. Methods A broad range of interventions were implemented in an attempt to reach the target audience; including case and contact management, vaccination clinics at schools and clinicians' offices, school exclusions, bar inspections, traditional communication strategies (including health care provider updates and posters) and newer communication strategies (including three sequential social media campaigns). Results A total of 143 cases of mumps were identified. Although cases' ages ranged from three to 72 years, most (76%) were 18-34 year olds, many of whom had frequented bars and local food establishments in downtown Toronto. 84% (n=120) of the cases were community-acquired. Only 16% (n=23) of the cases reported exposures in schools and post-secondary school institutions. Of those, 39% (n=56) of cases had an unknown vaccination history; 34% (n=49) were either not vaccinated or partially vaccinated with one dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine; and 27% (n=38) had received the recommended two doses of mumps vaccine. Determining vaccination status was a challenge, in part due to the lack of a registry. Vaccination was recommended when subjects were known to have had fewer than two doses of vaccine or had an unknown vaccination status. A social media campaign, emphasizing the risk of social activities if not protected from the mumps, yielded over 500,000 impressions from Facebook and Twitter messages and ads and an impressive engagement rate of between 1% and 10x%. Conclusion This was the largest mumps outbreak in Toronto in over 20 years. Among young adults, ongoing social media and traditional communication campaigns can contribute to the control of community mumps outbreaks. Encouraging vaccine uptake is desirable, but without a vaccine registry it is difficult to assess vaccination coverage among adults. Susceptible cohorts of young adults who were not adequately vaccinated pose a risk for future outbreaks. Given that almost 30% of the mumps cases were fully vaccinated with two doses of mumps-containing vaccine, even two doses may not provide complete protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信