巴西潜在和有效的远程工作:观察指标之间的差距

Felipe dos Santos Martins , Geraldo Sandoval Góes , José Antônio Sena Nascimento
{"title":"巴西潜在和有效的远程工作:观察指标之间的差距","authors":"Felipe dos Santos Martins ,&nbsp;Geraldo Sandoval Góes ,&nbsp;José Antônio Sena Nascimento","doi":"10.1016/j.econ.2021.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main objective of this paper is to seek an explanation for the gap between the estimated remote work potential for Brazil and the remote work observed in the country. For this, at first, the teleworking potential is estimated based on the methodology of Dingel and Neiman (2020) applied to the Brazilian PNAD <em>Contínua</em> research based on the period prior to the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the research’s second stage, this potential is compared with remote work measurement provided by the PNAD Covid-19 survey, which was carried out between May and November 2020. A potential and effective telework gap was found, and we sought to investigate its causes based on the first PNAD <em>Contínua</em> interviews conducted in 2019, which contains information on people's domicile. The results indicate that about a fifth of workers in occupations that can be performed remotely live in households without the necessary means to be in a home office, such as a computer with internet access or even continuous electricity. Thereby, the potential for remote work was refined considering the socioeconomic characteristics of the workers, via the characteristics of the households present in the PNAD <em>Contínua</em> survey, which resulted in a refinement in the initial estimate of the potential for remote work initially carried out here went from 22.7% to 16.7%, significantly closer to that observed in May 2020, whose percentage was 13.3%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100389,"journal":{"name":"EconomiA","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 265-277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000230/pdfft?md5=c89ddb50bb2a8ef7d3f68d2135c569a9&pid=1-s2.0-S1517758021000230-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential and effective remote work in Brazil: Looking into the gap between metrics\",\"authors\":\"Felipe dos Santos Martins ,&nbsp;Geraldo Sandoval Góes ,&nbsp;José Antônio Sena Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econ.2021.11.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main objective of this paper is to seek an explanation for the gap between the estimated remote work potential for Brazil and the remote work observed in the country. For this, at first, the teleworking potential is estimated based on the methodology of Dingel and Neiman (2020) applied to the Brazilian PNAD <em>Contínua</em> research based on the period prior to the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the research’s second stage, this potential is compared with remote work measurement provided by the PNAD Covid-19 survey, which was carried out between May and November 2020. A potential and effective telework gap was found, and we sought to investigate its causes based on the first PNAD <em>Contínua</em> interviews conducted in 2019, which contains information on people's domicile. The results indicate that about a fifth of workers in occupations that can be performed remotely live in households without the necessary means to be in a home office, such as a computer with internet access or even continuous electricity. Thereby, the potential for remote work was refined considering the socioeconomic characteristics of the workers, via the characteristics of the households present in the PNAD <em>Contínua</em> survey, which resulted in a refinement in the initial estimate of the potential for remote work initially carried out here went from 22.7% to 16.7%, significantly closer to that observed in May 2020, whose percentage was 13.3%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EconomiA\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 265-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000230/pdfft?md5=c89ddb50bb2a8ef7d3f68d2135c569a9&pid=1-s2.0-S1517758021000230-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EconomiA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EconomiA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的主要目的是寻求解释巴西估计的远程工作潜力与该国观察到的远程工作之间的差距。为此,首先,根据Dingel和Neiman(2020)应用于巴西PNAD Contínua研究的方法,基于Covid-19大流行开始前的时期,对远程工作潜力进行了估计。在研究的第二阶段,将这种潜力与2020年5月至11月期间进行的PNAD Covid-19调查提供的远程工作测量进行比较。我们发现了一个潜在的、有效的远程办公差距,并试图根据2019年进行的第一次PNAD Contínua访谈来调查其原因,该访谈包含了人们的住所信息。研究结果表明,在可以远程工作的职业中,约有五分之一的工人住在家里,没有必要的手段来在家办公,比如一台可以上网的电脑,甚至没有持续的电力供应。因此,通过PNAD Contínua调查中存在的家庭特征,考虑到工人的社会经济特征,远程工作的潜力得到了改进,这导致了对远程工作潜力的初步估计的改进,最初在这里进行的远程工作潜力从22.7%提高到16.7%,大大接近2020年5月的观察结果,其百分比为13.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential and effective remote work in Brazil: Looking into the gap between metrics

The main objective of this paper is to seek an explanation for the gap between the estimated remote work potential for Brazil and the remote work observed in the country. For this, at first, the teleworking potential is estimated based on the methodology of Dingel and Neiman (2020) applied to the Brazilian PNAD Contínua research based on the period prior to the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the research’s second stage, this potential is compared with remote work measurement provided by the PNAD Covid-19 survey, which was carried out between May and November 2020. A potential and effective telework gap was found, and we sought to investigate its causes based on the first PNAD Contínua interviews conducted in 2019, which contains information on people's domicile. The results indicate that about a fifth of workers in occupations that can be performed remotely live in households without the necessary means to be in a home office, such as a computer with internet access or even continuous electricity. Thereby, the potential for remote work was refined considering the socioeconomic characteristics of the workers, via the characteristics of the households present in the PNAD Contínua survey, which resulted in a refinement in the initial estimate of the potential for remote work initially carried out here went from 22.7% to 16.7%, significantly closer to that observed in May 2020, whose percentage was 13.3%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信