Thomas Lilly, Pratima Darr, M. Schmolesky, Todd Lindley, Marieke C. Schilpzand, Patrick Ludolph, R. Higgins, Young Shim, Aurélie G Weinstein, Daniel Von Deutsch, L. Burko
{"title":"打算教授批判性思维","authors":"Thomas Lilly, Pratima Darr, M. Schmolesky, Todd Lindley, Marieke C. Schilpzand, Patrick Ludolph, R. Higgins, Young Shim, Aurélie G Weinstein, Daniel Von Deutsch, L. Burko","doi":"10.14434/josotl.v22i3.31801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous studies from recent years and going back decades suggest that post-secondary students are failing to sufficiently improve their critical thinking (CT) skills during their undergraduate years (Abrami et al., 2015; Arum & Roksa, 2011; Huber & Kuncel, 2016). Meanwhile, institutions have increasingly embraced CT as a core competency and educational outcome. Several studies have demonstrated measurable within-semester increases in CT, but most often without a meaningful control group for comparison (Cargas et al. 2017; Grant & Smith 2018; Styers et al. 2018). This study asks if an intervention of embedding content-driven critical thinking exercises within courses would cause a measurable impact on critical thinking outcomes within one semester. All participating courses were paired with an instructor teaching a control section alongside an experimental section. All sections were exposed to pre- and post-assessments, using the Critical Thinking Assessment test. Pre-post results indicated statistically significant gains for experimental groups compared with control groups.","PeriodicalId":93822,"journal":{"name":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intending to Teach Critical Thinking\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Lilly, Pratima Darr, M. Schmolesky, Todd Lindley, Marieke C. Schilpzand, Patrick Ludolph, R. Higgins, Young Shim, Aurélie G Weinstein, Daniel Von Deutsch, L. Burko\",\"doi\":\"10.14434/josotl.v22i3.31801\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous studies from recent years and going back decades suggest that post-secondary students are failing to sufficiently improve their critical thinking (CT) skills during their undergraduate years (Abrami et al., 2015; Arum & Roksa, 2011; Huber & Kuncel, 2016). Meanwhile, institutions have increasingly embraced CT as a core competency and educational outcome. Several studies have demonstrated measurable within-semester increases in CT, but most often without a meaningful control group for comparison (Cargas et al. 2017; Grant & Smith 2018; Styers et al. 2018). This study asks if an intervention of embedding content-driven critical thinking exercises within courses would cause a measurable impact on critical thinking outcomes within one semester. All participating courses were paired with an instructor teaching a control section alongside an experimental section. All sections were exposed to pre- and post-assessments, using the Critical Thinking Assessment test. Pre-post results indicated statistically significant gains for experimental groups compared with control groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i3.31801\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i3.31801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来和过去几十年的大量研究表明,大专学生在本科期间未能充分提高他们的批判性思维(CT)技能(Abrami et al., 2015;Arum & Roksa, 2011;Huber & Kuncel, 2016)。与此同时,越来越多的院校将计算机科学作为一项核心竞争力和教育成果。几项研究已经证明了学期内CT的可测量性增加,但大多数情况下没有有意义的对照组进行比较(Cargas等人,2017;Grant & Smith 2018;Styers et al. 2018)。本研究询问在课程中嵌入内容驱动的批判性思维练习的干预是否会在一个学期内对批判性思维结果产生可衡量的影响。所有参与的课程都由一名教师在教授实验部分的同时教授控制部分。使用批判性思维评估测试对所有部分进行了前后评估。前后结果显示实验组与对照组相比有统计学上显著的增益。
Numerous studies from recent years and going back decades suggest that post-secondary students are failing to sufficiently improve their critical thinking (CT) skills during their undergraduate years (Abrami et al., 2015; Arum & Roksa, 2011; Huber & Kuncel, 2016). Meanwhile, institutions have increasingly embraced CT as a core competency and educational outcome. Several studies have demonstrated measurable within-semester increases in CT, but most often without a meaningful control group for comparison (Cargas et al. 2017; Grant & Smith 2018; Styers et al. 2018). This study asks if an intervention of embedding content-driven critical thinking exercises within courses would cause a measurable impact on critical thinking outcomes within one semester. All participating courses were paired with an instructor teaching a control section alongside an experimental section. All sections were exposed to pre- and post-assessments, using the Critical Thinking Assessment test. Pre-post results indicated statistically significant gains for experimental groups compared with control groups.