孟买DOTS患者自我报告结核病治疗依从性的准确性

N. Sathiakumar, S. Bagchi, D. Singh, Pk Vijay, G. Ambe
{"title":"孟买DOTS患者自我报告结核病治疗依从性的准确性","authors":"N. Sathiakumar, S. Bagchi, D. Singh, Pk Vijay, G. Ambe","doi":"10.4314/IJHR.V3I3.70277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compared self-reported adherence to DOTS therapy with urine rifampicin metabolite levels and medical records among patients in Mumbai, India. Methods: Study subjects (N=538) were randomly selected from the DOTS centers in Mumbai, India. Self-reported adherence was ascertained by interviews; unannounced home visits were conducted, and urine samples were collected for rifampicin metabolite testing using the n-butanol test. Information from medical records was abstracted for documented receipt of drugs from the DOTS centers. Results: Agreement between self-reported adherence and urine tests was very poor (kappa, 0.08); and between self-reports and medical records was moderate (kappa, 0.47). Receipt of drugs did not ensure adherence. Based on urine n-butanol test, 75% of patients were adherent. Physical appearance of urine for rifampicin excretion with the n-butanol extraction method indicated a high positive predictive value (95%). Conclusion: We recommend incorporating urine tests for various drug metabolites periodically in the DOTS program to ensure treatment adherence. Keywords: Tuberculosis; Adherence; Urine testing; Rifampicin; DOTS","PeriodicalId":93450,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health research and innovation","volume":"172 1","pages":"133-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Self-Reported Adherence to Tuberculosis Therapy among DOTS patients in Mumbai\",\"authors\":\"N. Sathiakumar, S. Bagchi, D. Singh, Pk Vijay, G. Ambe\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/IJHR.V3I3.70277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compared self-reported adherence to DOTS therapy with urine rifampicin metabolite levels and medical records among patients in Mumbai, India. Methods: Study subjects (N=538) were randomly selected from the DOTS centers in Mumbai, India. Self-reported adherence was ascertained by interviews; unannounced home visits were conducted, and urine samples were collected for rifampicin metabolite testing using the n-butanol test. Information from medical records was abstracted for documented receipt of drugs from the DOTS centers. Results: Agreement between self-reported adherence and urine tests was very poor (kappa, 0.08); and between self-reports and medical records was moderate (kappa, 0.47). Receipt of drugs did not ensure adherence. Based on urine n-butanol test, 75% of patients were adherent. Physical appearance of urine for rifampicin excretion with the n-butanol extraction method indicated a high positive predictive value (95%). Conclusion: We recommend incorporating urine tests for various drug metabolites periodically in the DOTS program to ensure treatment adherence. Keywords: Tuberculosis; Adherence; Urine testing; Rifampicin; DOTS\",\"PeriodicalId\":93450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of health research and innovation\",\"volume\":\"172 1\",\"pages\":\"133-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of health research and innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/IJHR.V3I3.70277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health research and innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/IJHR.V3I3.70277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:比较印度孟买患者自我报告的DOTS治疗依从性与尿利福平代谢物水平和医疗记录。方法:从印度孟买DOTS中心随机抽取研究对象538例。自我报告的依从性是通过访谈确定的;进行了不事先通知的家访,并收集尿液样本,使用正丁醇试验进行利福平代谢物检测。从医疗记录中提取信息,以记录从DOTS中心收到的药品。结果:自述依从性与尿检之间的一致性非常差(kappa, 0.08);自我报告与医疗记录之间存在中度差异(kappa, 0.47)。收到药物并不能保证依从性。根据尿正丁醇试验,75%的患者粘附。用正丁醇提取法检测尿液的物理外观对利福平排泄具有较高的阳性预测值(95%)。结论:我们建议在DOTS计划中定期纳入尿检各种药物代谢物,以确保治疗依从性。关键词:结核病;依从性;尿液测试;利福平;点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of Self-Reported Adherence to Tuberculosis Therapy among DOTS patients in Mumbai
Purpose: To compared self-reported adherence to DOTS therapy with urine rifampicin metabolite levels and medical records among patients in Mumbai, India. Methods: Study subjects (N=538) were randomly selected from the DOTS centers in Mumbai, India. Self-reported adherence was ascertained by interviews; unannounced home visits were conducted, and urine samples were collected for rifampicin metabolite testing using the n-butanol test. Information from medical records was abstracted for documented receipt of drugs from the DOTS centers. Results: Agreement between self-reported adherence and urine tests was very poor (kappa, 0.08); and between self-reports and medical records was moderate (kappa, 0.47). Receipt of drugs did not ensure adherence. Based on urine n-butanol test, 75% of patients were adherent. Physical appearance of urine for rifampicin excretion with the n-butanol extraction method indicated a high positive predictive value (95%). Conclusion: We recommend incorporating urine tests for various drug metabolites periodically in the DOTS program to ensure treatment adherence. Keywords: Tuberculosis; Adherence; Urine testing; Rifampicin; DOTS
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信