[学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表的信度和效度-现在版和终生版,DSM-5十一月2016]。

F. Ünal, F. Öktem, Füsun Çetin Çuhadaroğlu, S. E. Çengel Kültür, D. Akdemir, Dilşad Foto Özdemir, H. T. Çak, D. Ünal, K. Tiras, Cihan Aslan, Bilge Merve Kalaycı, Büşra Sultan Aydos, Funda Kütük, Emine Taşyürek, Remzi Karaokur, Başak Karabucak, B. Karakök, Yusuf Karaer, A. Artık
{"title":"[学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表的信度和效度-现在版和终生版,DSM-5十一月2016]。","authors":"F. Ünal, F. Öktem, Füsun Çetin Çuhadaroğlu, S. E. Çengel Kültür, D. Akdemir, Dilşad Foto Özdemir, H. T. Çak, D. Ünal, K. Tiras, Cihan Aslan, Bilge Merve Kalaycı, Büşra Sultan Aydos, Funda Kütük, Emine Taşyürek, Remzi Karaokur, Başak Karabucak, B. Karakök, Yusuf Karaer, A. Artık","doi":"10.5080/u23408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016 -Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T).  METHOD: A total of 150 children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years of age were assessed with K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T. The degree of agreement between the DSM-5 criteria diagnoses and the K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T diagnoses were considered as the measure of consensus validity. In addition, concurrent validity was examined by analyzing the correlation between the diagnoses on K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T and relevant scales. Interrater reliabilities were assessed on randomly selected 20 participants. Likewise, randomly selected 20 other participants were interviewed with K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T three weeks after the first interview to evaluate test-retest reliability.  RESULTS: The consistency of diagnoses was almost perfect for eating disorders, selective mutism and autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.92-1.0), substantial for elimination disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, depressive disorders, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (κ=0.67-0.80). Interrater reliability was perfect for selective mutism (κ=1.0), substantial for oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depressive disorders and social anxiety disorder (κ=0.63-0.73). Test-retest reliability was almost perfect for autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.82), substantial for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, depressive disorders and generalized anxiety disorder (κ=0.62-0.78).  CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T is an effective instrument for diagnosing major childhood psychiatric disorders including selective mutism, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and autism spectrum disorder which have recently been added to the schedule.","PeriodicalId":94262,"journal":{"name":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T)].\",\"authors\":\"F. Ünal, F. Öktem, Füsun Çetin Çuhadaroğlu, S. E. Çengel Kültür, D. Akdemir, Dilşad Foto Özdemir, H. T. Çak, D. Ünal, K. Tiras, Cihan Aslan, Bilge Merve Kalaycı, Büşra Sultan Aydos, Funda Kütük, Emine Taşyürek, Remzi Karaokur, Başak Karabucak, B. Karakök, Yusuf Karaer, A. Artık\",\"doi\":\"10.5080/u23408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016 -Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T).  METHOD: A total of 150 children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years of age were assessed with K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T. The degree of agreement between the DSM-5 criteria diagnoses and the K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T diagnoses were considered as the measure of consensus validity. In addition, concurrent validity was examined by analyzing the correlation between the diagnoses on K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T and relevant scales. Interrater reliabilities were assessed on randomly selected 20 participants. Likewise, randomly selected 20 other participants were interviewed with K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T three weeks after the first interview to evaluate test-retest reliability.  RESULTS: The consistency of diagnoses was almost perfect for eating disorders, selective mutism and autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.92-1.0), substantial for elimination disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, depressive disorders, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (κ=0.67-0.80). Interrater reliability was perfect for selective mutism (κ=1.0), substantial for oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depressive disorders and social anxiety disorder (κ=0.63-0.73). Test-retest reliability was almost perfect for autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.82), substantial for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, depressive disorders and generalized anxiety disorder (κ=0.62-0.78).  CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T is an effective instrument for diagnosing major childhood psychiatric disorders including selective mutism, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and autism spectrum disorder which have recently been added to the schedule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"77\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5080/u23408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u23408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

摘要

目的本研究的目的是评估《学龄期儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症表》的信度和效度,DSM-5 2016年11月版-土耳其版(k - sads - sl -DSM-5- t)。方法:采用K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T对150名6 - 17岁的儿童和青少年进行评估。DSM-5标准诊断与K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T诊断之间的一致程度被认为是共识效度的度量。此外,通过分析K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T诊断结果与相关量表的相关性来检验并发效度。对随机选择的20名参与者进行评估。同样,随机选择20名其他参与者在第一次访谈后三周进行K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T访谈,以评估重测信度。结果:进食障碍、选择性缄默症和自闭症谱系障碍的诊断一致性较好(κ=0.92-1.0),消除障碍、强迫症、对立违抗性障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍、社交焦虑障碍、抑郁症、破坏性情绪调节障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断一致性较好(κ=0.67-0.80)。选择性缄默症的量表间信度为完美(κ=1.0),对立违抗性障碍、破坏性情绪失调障碍、注意缺陷多动障碍、抑郁症和社交焦虑障碍的量表间信度为相当(κ=0.63-0.73)。自闭症谱系障碍的重测信度近乎完美(κ=0.82),注意缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗性障碍、破坏性情绪失调障碍、抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症的重测信度相当高(κ=0.62-0.78)。结论:本研究结果表明,k - sads - l - dsm -5- t是诊断选择性缄默症、破坏性情绪失调障碍和自闭症谱系障碍等近年来新增的儿童重大精神障碍的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T)].
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age ChildrenPresent and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016 -Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T).  METHOD: A total of 150 children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years of age were assessed with K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T. The degree of agreement between the DSM-5 criteria diagnoses and the K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T diagnoses were considered as the measure of consensus validity. In addition, concurrent validity was examined by analyzing the correlation between the diagnoses on K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T and relevant scales. Interrater reliabilities were assessed on randomly selected 20 participants. Likewise, randomly selected 20 other participants were interviewed with K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T three weeks after the first interview to evaluate test-retest reliability.  RESULTS: The consistency of diagnoses was almost perfect for eating disorders, selective mutism and autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.92-1.0), substantial for elimination disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, depressive disorders, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (κ=0.67-0.80). Interrater reliability was perfect for selective mutism (κ=1.0), substantial for oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depressive disorders and social anxiety disorder (κ=0.63-0.73). Test-retest reliability was almost perfect for autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.82), substantial for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, depressive disorders and generalized anxiety disorder (κ=0.62-0.78).  CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T is an effective instrument for diagnosing major childhood psychiatric disorders including selective mutism, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder and autism spectrum disorder which have recently been added to the schedule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信