我们是谁:选民参与、理性与1999年大选

S. Friedman
{"title":"我们是谁:选民参与、理性与1999年大选","authors":"S. Friedman","doi":"10.1080/02589349908705082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article suggests that voting behaviour during the 1999 South African election refutes the claim (derived from rational choice theory, but common among South African elites) that voters base their decisions on whether or not to cast a ballot on mainly instrumental criteria. Rather, the election revealed a high degree of enthusiasm for democratic participation as an intrinsic value. The article argues that this has important implications for governance strategy, providing a critique of the prevalent assumption that democratic strengthening will depend largely on enhanced material ‘delivery’ rather than on broadening and deepening democracy.","PeriodicalId":81644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","volume":"2011 1","pages":"213-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who we are: voter participation, rationality and the 1999 election\",\"authors\":\"S. Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02589349908705082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article suggests that voting behaviour during the 1999 South African election refutes the claim (derived from rational choice theory, but common among South African elites) that voters base their decisions on whether or not to cast a ballot on mainly instrumental criteria. Rather, the election revealed a high degree of enthusiasm for democratic participation as an intrinsic value. The article argues that this has important implications for governance strategy, providing a critique of the prevalent assumption that democratic strengthening will depend largely on enhanced material ‘delivery’ rather than on broadening and deepening democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Commonwealth political studies\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"213-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Commonwealth political studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349908705082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Commonwealth political studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349908705082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

本文认为,1999年南非大选期间的投票行为驳斥了一种观点(这种观点来自理性选择理论,但在南非精英中很常见),即选民的决定主要基于是否投票的工具标准。相反,这次选举显示出对民主参与作为一种内在价值的高度热情。这篇文章认为,这对治理战略具有重要意义,对普遍存在的假设提出了批评,即民主的加强将主要取决于增强的物质“交付”,而不是扩大和深化民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who we are: voter participation, rationality and the 1999 election
Abstract This article suggests that voting behaviour during the 1999 South African election refutes the claim (derived from rational choice theory, but common among South African elites) that voters base their decisions on whether or not to cast a ballot on mainly instrumental criteria. Rather, the election revealed a high degree of enthusiasm for democratic participation as an intrinsic value. The article argues that this has important implications for governance strategy, providing a critique of the prevalent assumption that democratic strengthening will depend largely on enhanced material ‘delivery’ rather than on broadening and deepening democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信