Xin-chuang Wang, Shi-dong Wang, Da-pao Yu, Li Zhou, L. Dai
{"title":"黑龙江省森林生态系统碳储量与碳密度","authors":"Xin-chuang Wang, Shi-dong Wang, Da-pao Yu, Li Zhou, L. Dai","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.201209.0309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately estimating carbon storage for forest ecosystems is important for understanding the role of forests in global warming and also in supporting decision-making processes in forest management. Using forest inventory data in combination with field data, we explored characteristics of carbon storage, density, and distribution for different forest ecosystems and their components in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China. Results showed that total carbon storage was 4125.002 Tg C. The soil layer accounted for the most storage with 3205.764 Tg C or 77.7% of the total. This was followed by the canopy, litter, and shrub-grass layers with 800.965 (19.4%), 106.568 (2.6%), and 11.705 Tg C (0.3%), respectively. The average carbon density of forest ecosystems was 215.816 Mg C ha^(-1), with the soil layer (167.722 Mg C ha^(-1)) the densest, followed by the canopy layer (41.906 Mg C ha^(-1)), litter (5.576 Mg C ha^(-1)), and shrub layers (0.612 Mg C ha^(-1)). Carbon storage in different forest ecosystems varied 37.87~1306.63 Tg C, while C density ranged 167.68~256.87 Mg C ha^(-1), with the highest and lowest values observed in the soil and shrub-grass layers, respectively. That implies that the soil is the main body for forest carbon storage. The methods and data used for forest carbon storage estimation obviously affected results of the estimates. Rational methods should be adopted based on obtaining sufficient data for estimates. Middle-aged forests accounted for a greater proportion of forests in the province than forests in other age classes, and proper management of forests could increase the carbon sequestration of forest ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"309-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon Storage and Density of Forest Ecosystems in Heilongjiang Province, China\",\"authors\":\"Xin-chuang Wang, Shi-dong Wang, Da-pao Yu, Li Zhou, L. Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.7075/TJFS.201209.0309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurately estimating carbon storage for forest ecosystems is important for understanding the role of forests in global warming and also in supporting decision-making processes in forest management. Using forest inventory data in combination with field data, we explored characteristics of carbon storage, density, and distribution for different forest ecosystems and their components in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China. Results showed that total carbon storage was 4125.002 Tg C. The soil layer accounted for the most storage with 3205.764 Tg C or 77.7% of the total. This was followed by the canopy, litter, and shrub-grass layers with 800.965 (19.4%), 106.568 (2.6%), and 11.705 Tg C (0.3%), respectively. The average carbon density of forest ecosystems was 215.816 Mg C ha^(-1), with the soil layer (167.722 Mg C ha^(-1)) the densest, followed by the canopy layer (41.906 Mg C ha^(-1)), litter (5.576 Mg C ha^(-1)), and shrub layers (0.612 Mg C ha^(-1)). Carbon storage in different forest ecosystems varied 37.87~1306.63 Tg C, while C density ranged 167.68~256.87 Mg C ha^(-1), with the highest and lowest values observed in the soil and shrub-grass layers, respectively. That implies that the soil is the main body for forest carbon storage. The methods and data used for forest carbon storage estimation obviously affected results of the estimates. Rational methods should be adopted based on obtaining sufficient data for estimates. Middle-aged forests accounted for a greater proportion of forests in the province than forests in other age classes, and proper management of forests could increase the carbon sequestration of forest ecosystems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"309-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.201209.0309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.201209.0309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
准确估计森林生态系统的碳储量对于了解森林在全球变暖中的作用以及支持森林管理决策过程非常重要。利用森林清查资料与野外数据相结合,探讨了黑龙江省不同森林生态系统及其组成部分的碳储量、密度和分布特征。结果表明,土壤碳总储量为4125.002 Tg C,其中土壤碳储量最多,为3205.764 Tg C,占总储量的77.7%。其次是冠层、凋落物层和灌草层,分别为800.965(19.4%)、106.568(2.6%)和11.705 Tg C(0.3%)。森林生态系统的平均碳密度为215.816 Mg C ha^(-1),其中土壤层(167.722 Mg C ha^(-1))密度最大,其次是冠层(41.906 Mg C ha^(-1))、凋落物层(5.576 Mg C ha^(-1))和灌木层(0.612 Mg C ha^(-1))。不同森林生态系统碳储量变化范围为37.87~1306.63 Tg C,碳密度变化范围为167.68~256.87 Mg C ha^(-1),土壤层碳储量最高,灌草层碳储量最低。这意味着土壤是森林碳储存的主体。森林碳储量估算的方法和数据对估算结果有明显影响。在获得足够的估算数据的基础上,采用合理的方法。中年森林占全省森林的比例高于其他年龄级别的森林,适当的森林管理可以增加森林生态系统的碳固存。
Carbon Storage and Density of Forest Ecosystems in Heilongjiang Province, China
Accurately estimating carbon storage for forest ecosystems is important for understanding the role of forests in global warming and also in supporting decision-making processes in forest management. Using forest inventory data in combination with field data, we explored characteristics of carbon storage, density, and distribution for different forest ecosystems and their components in Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China. Results showed that total carbon storage was 4125.002 Tg C. The soil layer accounted for the most storage with 3205.764 Tg C or 77.7% of the total. This was followed by the canopy, litter, and shrub-grass layers with 800.965 (19.4%), 106.568 (2.6%), and 11.705 Tg C (0.3%), respectively. The average carbon density of forest ecosystems was 215.816 Mg C ha^(-1), with the soil layer (167.722 Mg C ha^(-1)) the densest, followed by the canopy layer (41.906 Mg C ha^(-1)), litter (5.576 Mg C ha^(-1)), and shrub layers (0.612 Mg C ha^(-1)). Carbon storage in different forest ecosystems varied 37.87~1306.63 Tg C, while C density ranged 167.68~256.87 Mg C ha^(-1), with the highest and lowest values observed in the soil and shrub-grass layers, respectively. That implies that the soil is the main body for forest carbon storage. The methods and data used for forest carbon storage estimation obviously affected results of the estimates. Rational methods should be adopted based on obtaining sufficient data for estimates. Middle-aged forests accounted for a greater proportion of forests in the province than forests in other age classes, and proper management of forests could increase the carbon sequestration of forest ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.