当代宪政民主:程序化的初步研究

Matheus DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA
{"title":"当代宪政民主:程序化的初步研究","authors":"Matheus DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA","doi":"10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to present the procedural system as a coordination mechanism of State action, which fits within the separation of powers, and it is a response to the paradoxical cases arising from post-modern society. In this way, the limits of constitutional law resulting from post-modern complexity will be presented, along with the problem of paradoxical cases, which are not those called \"hard cases\", and the paradigm of proceduralization as a measure of contemporary constitutional democracy. In addition, the stages and aspects of social structural construction that have built post-modern society will be presented, and that have raised the social problems of litigious cases, whose Judiciary has full capacity to decide them, to undecidable cases, especially with the process of extinction of metanarratives and the transition from the society of organizations to the society of platforms.","PeriodicalId":21289,"journal":{"name":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A DEMOCRACIA CONSTITUCIONAL CONTEMPORÂNEA: ESTUDOS PRELIMINARES SOBRE A PROCEDURALIZAÇÃO\",\"authors\":\"Matheus DE OLIVEIRA CUNHA\",\"doi\":\"10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article intends to present the procedural system as a coordination mechanism of State action, which fits within the separation of powers, and it is a response to the paradoxical cases arising from post-modern society. In this way, the limits of constitutional law resulting from post-modern complexity will be presented, along with the problem of paradoxical cases, which are not those called \\\"hard cases\\\", and the paradigm of proceduralization as a measure of contemporary constitutional democracy. In addition, the stages and aspects of social structural construction that have built post-modern society will be presented, and that have raised the social problems of litigious cases, whose Judiciary has full capacity to decide them, to undecidable cases, especially with the process of extinction of metanarratives and the transition from the society of organizations to the society of platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Científica Semana Acadêmica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35265/2236-6717-237-12683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在将程序制度作为一种国家行动的协调机制呈现出来,它符合三权分立的要求,是对后现代社会中出现的矛盾案例的回应。通过这种方式,将呈现出后现代复杂性所导致的宪法的局限性,以及悖论案例(不是所谓的“硬案例”)的问题,以及作为当代宪政民主衡量标准的程序化范式。此外,还将呈现构建后现代社会的社会结构建构的阶段和方面,以及这些阶段和方面将诉讼案件的社会问题,特别是随着元叙事的消亡和从组织社会向平台社会的过渡,司法机构完全有能力裁决这些案件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A DEMOCRACIA CONSTITUCIONAL CONTEMPORÂNEA: ESTUDOS PRELIMINARES SOBRE A PROCEDURALIZAÇÃO
This article intends to present the procedural system as a coordination mechanism of State action, which fits within the separation of powers, and it is a response to the paradoxical cases arising from post-modern society. In this way, the limits of constitutional law resulting from post-modern complexity will be presented, along with the problem of paradoxical cases, which are not those called "hard cases", and the paradigm of proceduralization as a measure of contemporary constitutional democracy. In addition, the stages and aspects of social structural construction that have built post-modern society will be presented, and that have raised the social problems of litigious cases, whose Judiciary has full capacity to decide them, to undecidable cases, especially with the process of extinction of metanarratives and the transition from the society of organizations to the society of platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信