{"title":"具有抢占阈值的固定优先级调度下实时任务的最佳响应时间研究","authors":"Hector J. Rivera-Verduzco, R. J. Bril","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds (FPTS) is supported by the AUTOSAR and OSEK standards as a scheduling policy. Since FPTS is a generalization of fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS) and fixed-priority nonpreemptive scheduling (FPNS), it aims to improve schedulability. In this paper, we prove, as an intermediate step towards the exact best-case response time analysis for FPTS, that the best-case computation time of a non-preemptive task scheduled under FPTS or FPNS is a tight lower bound for its response time. In addition, we illustrate by means of an example that the best-case response time analysis for FPTS is most likely not a straight forward extension of the current best-case analysis for FPPS.","PeriodicalId":6522,"journal":{"name":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","volume":"101 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards best-case response times of real-time tasks under fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds\",\"authors\":\"Hector J. Rivera-Verduzco, R. J. Bril\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds (FPTS) is supported by the AUTOSAR and OSEK standards as a scheduling policy. Since FPTS is a generalization of fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS) and fixed-priority nonpreemptive scheduling (FPNS), it aims to improve schedulability. In this paper, we prove, as an intermediate step towards the exact best-case response time analysis for FPTS, that the best-case computation time of a non-preemptive task scheduled under FPTS or FPNS is a tight lower bound for its response time. In addition, we illustrate by means of an example that the best-case response time analysis for FPTS is most likely not a straight forward extension of the current best-case analysis for FPPS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards best-case response times of real-time tasks under fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds
Fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds (FPTS) is supported by the AUTOSAR and OSEK standards as a scheduling policy. Since FPTS is a generalization of fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS) and fixed-priority nonpreemptive scheduling (FPNS), it aims to improve schedulability. In this paper, we prove, as an intermediate step towards the exact best-case response time analysis for FPTS, that the best-case computation time of a non-preemptive task scheduled under FPTS or FPNS is a tight lower bound for its response time. In addition, we illustrate by means of an example that the best-case response time analysis for FPTS is most likely not a straight forward extension of the current best-case analysis for FPPS.