具有抢占阈值的固定优先级调度下实时任务的最佳响应时间研究

Hector J. Rivera-Verduzco, R. J. Bril
{"title":"具有抢占阈值的固定优先级调度下实时任务的最佳响应时间研究","authors":"Hector J. Rivera-Verduzco, R. J. Bril","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds (FPTS) is supported by the AUTOSAR and OSEK standards as a scheduling policy. Since FPTS is a generalization of fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS) and fixed-priority nonpreemptive scheduling (FPNS), it aims to improve schedulability. In this paper, we prove, as an intermediate step towards the exact best-case response time analysis for FPTS, that the best-case computation time of a non-preemptive task scheduled under FPTS or FPNS is a tight lower bound for its response time. In addition, we illustrate by means of an example that the best-case response time analysis for FPTS is most likely not a straight forward extension of the current best-case analysis for FPPS.","PeriodicalId":6522,"journal":{"name":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","volume":"101 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards best-case response times of real-time tasks under fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds\",\"authors\":\"Hector J. Rivera-Verduzco, R. J. Bril\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds (FPTS) is supported by the AUTOSAR and OSEK standards as a scheduling policy. Since FPTS is a generalization of fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS) and fixed-priority nonpreemptive scheduling (FPNS), it aims to improve schedulability. In this paper, we prove, as an intermediate step towards the exact best-case response time analysis for FPTS, that the best-case computation time of a non-preemptive task scheduled under FPTS or FPNS is a tight lower bound for its response time. In addition, we illustrate by means of an example that the best-case response time analysis for FPTS is most likely not a straight forward extension of the current best-case analysis for FPPS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

具有抢占阈值的固定优先级调度是AUTOSAR和OSEK标准支持的一种调度策略。由于FPTS是固定优先级抢占调度(FPPS)和固定优先级非抢占调度(FPNS)的推广,其目的是提高可调度性。在本文中,我们证明了在FPTS或FPNS下调度的非抢占任务的最佳情况计算时间是其响应时间的紧下界,作为对FPTS最佳情况响应时间精确分析的中间步骤。此外,我们通过一个示例说明,FPTS的最佳情况响应时间分析很可能不是当前FPPS最佳情况分析的直接扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards best-case response times of real-time tasks under fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds
Fixed-priority scheduling with preemption thresholds (FPTS) is supported by the AUTOSAR and OSEK standards as a scheduling policy. Since FPTS is a generalization of fixed-priority preemptive scheduling (FPPS) and fixed-priority nonpreemptive scheduling (FPNS), it aims to improve schedulability. In this paper, we prove, as an intermediate step towards the exact best-case response time analysis for FPTS, that the best-case computation time of a non-preemptive task scheduled under FPTS or FPNS is a tight lower bound for its response time. In addition, we illustrate by means of an example that the best-case response time analysis for FPTS is most likely not a straight forward extension of the current best-case analysis for FPPS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信