希腊退欧及其不会发生的原因:希腊的灾难和欧元的不稳定

Platon Monokroussos, Theodoros G. Stamatiou, S. Gogos
{"title":"希腊退欧及其不会发生的原因:希腊的灾难和欧元的不稳定","authors":"Platon Monokroussos, Theodoros G. Stamatiou, S. Gogos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2616278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Severe cash constraints faced by the Greek Government due to a pretty demanding schedule of interest and amortization payments in the second half of 2015 have engineered a new explosion of sovereign bond spreads and rekindled fears of a GRexit down the road. Such fears have been exacerbated further in late April 2015 as the progress in implementing the February 20th 2015 Eurogroup agreement has proven to be rather slow and the cash-strapped Greek Government was struggling to meet sizeable debt service obligations. As a result, media reports had been speculating on a number of disastrous scenarios, ranging from the imposition of capital controls or the payment of civil servants and various state suppliers with promissory notes to a sovereign default, either within or outside the Economic and Monetary Union. This paper refrains from analyzing the legal and technical complications involved in the materialization of any of the aforementioned scenarios. Instead, it leans on purely economic and political economy considerations to argue that calls for exit are ill advised, potentially involving immense risks not only for Greece, but also for the EMU project as a whole. We take a close look at Greece’s past history of drachma devaluations and their outcome, the current high sovereign indebtedness, and the country’s persisting competitiveness gap vis-a-vis its main trading partners as well as the effects of financial contagion during the ongoing European Sovereign Debt Crisis. We explain why a GRexit would be a hugely suboptimal (and, in fact, a highly dangerous) strategy to address these problems.","PeriodicalId":20862,"journal":{"name":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GRexit and Why It Will Not Happen: Catastrophic for Greece and Destabilizing for the Euro\",\"authors\":\"Platon Monokroussos, Theodoros G. Stamatiou, S. Gogos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2616278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Severe cash constraints faced by the Greek Government due to a pretty demanding schedule of interest and amortization payments in the second half of 2015 have engineered a new explosion of sovereign bond spreads and rekindled fears of a GRexit down the road. Such fears have been exacerbated further in late April 2015 as the progress in implementing the February 20th 2015 Eurogroup agreement has proven to be rather slow and the cash-strapped Greek Government was struggling to meet sizeable debt service obligations. As a result, media reports had been speculating on a number of disastrous scenarios, ranging from the imposition of capital controls or the payment of civil servants and various state suppliers with promissory notes to a sovereign default, either within or outside the Economic and Monetary Union. This paper refrains from analyzing the legal and technical complications involved in the materialization of any of the aforementioned scenarios. Instead, it leans on purely economic and political economy considerations to argue that calls for exit are ill advised, potentially involving immense risks not only for Greece, but also for the EMU project as a whole. We take a close look at Greece’s past history of drachma devaluations and their outcome, the current high sovereign indebtedness, and the country’s persisting competitiveness gap vis-a-vis its main trading partners as well as the effects of financial contagion during the ongoing European Sovereign Debt Crisis. We explain why a GRexit would be a hugely suboptimal (and, in fact, a highly dangerous) strategy to address these problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2616278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: International Financial Crises (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2616278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2015年下半年,由于利息和摊销支付的时间表相当苛刻,希腊政府面临严重的现金短缺,导致主权债券息差出现新的爆炸式增长,并重新引发了对希腊退出欧元区的担忧。这种担忧在2015年4月下旬进一步加剧,因为2015年2月20日欧元集团协议的实施进展相当缓慢,而资金紧张的希腊政府正在努力履行相当大的债务偿还义务。因此,媒体报道一直在猜测一些灾难性的情况,从实行资本管制或向公务员和各种国家供应商支付本票到主权违约,无论是在经济和货币联盟内部还是外部。本文避免分析上述任何一种情况具体化所涉及的法律和技术复杂性。相反,它依靠纯粹的经济和政治经济考虑来辩称,呼吁退出是不明智的,这不仅可能给希腊带来巨大风险,也可能给整个欧洲货币联盟带来巨大风险。我们仔细研究了希腊过去德拉克马贬值的历史及其后果、目前的高主权债务、该国相对于主要贸易伙伴的持续竞争力差距,以及正在进行的欧洲主权债务危机期间金融传染的影响。我们解释了为什么希腊退欧是解决这些问题的一个极不理想的(实际上是一个非常危险的)策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GRexit and Why It Will Not Happen: Catastrophic for Greece and Destabilizing for the Euro
Severe cash constraints faced by the Greek Government due to a pretty demanding schedule of interest and amortization payments in the second half of 2015 have engineered a new explosion of sovereign bond spreads and rekindled fears of a GRexit down the road. Such fears have been exacerbated further in late April 2015 as the progress in implementing the February 20th 2015 Eurogroup agreement has proven to be rather slow and the cash-strapped Greek Government was struggling to meet sizeable debt service obligations. As a result, media reports had been speculating on a number of disastrous scenarios, ranging from the imposition of capital controls or the payment of civil servants and various state suppliers with promissory notes to a sovereign default, either within or outside the Economic and Monetary Union. This paper refrains from analyzing the legal and technical complications involved in the materialization of any of the aforementioned scenarios. Instead, it leans on purely economic and political economy considerations to argue that calls for exit are ill advised, potentially involving immense risks not only for Greece, but also for the EMU project as a whole. We take a close look at Greece’s past history of drachma devaluations and their outcome, the current high sovereign indebtedness, and the country’s persisting competitiveness gap vis-a-vis its main trading partners as well as the effects of financial contagion during the ongoing European Sovereign Debt Crisis. We explain why a GRexit would be a hugely suboptimal (and, in fact, a highly dangerous) strategy to address these problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信