Paul Belleflamme, Alexandre de Cornière, Oliver Falck, A. Gautier
{"title":"“数码经济”特刊","authors":"Paul Belleflamme, Alexandre de Cornière, Oliver Falck, A. Gautier","doi":"10.1515/rne-2018-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of digitization has already had a profound impact on the functioning of the markets in the last decade, and it should bring even more interesting changes in the near future. This Special Issue on the Economics of Digitization includes four selected articles, which illustrate the implications of various aspects of digitization for consumers and firms. The analysis of price discrimination has recently taken a new – and very interesting – turn, almost one century after the concept was formally introduced (Pigou proposed the first taxonomy of price discrimination practices in his book “Economics of Welfare” in 1920). The reason for this renewed interest is to be found in the continuously decreasing costs of processing data and in improved data algorithms, which allow firms to know much more about their consumers’ willingness to pay. These technological developments have four important consequences for the economic analysis of price discrimination. First, perfect price discrimination is no longer seen as a theoretical benchmark but as a true possibility. Second, as consumers care about their privacy and can act to protect it, they become strategic players, meaning that firms must factor in the consumers’ potential reactions when they choose their pricing strategy. Third, as more firms can easily collect and process data, a more careful examination of competitive price discrimination is called for. Finally, as data is the necessary input for price discrimination, it becomes a commodity, whose trade needs to be analyzed. The article by Alexandre de Cornière and Rodrigo Montes (Consumer Privacy and the Incentives to Price-Discriminate in Online Markets) contributes to the first two issues: it studies the interaction between a monopoly firm, which can (imperfectly) identify consumers’ willingness to pay, and consumers, who can prevent","PeriodicalId":45659,"journal":{"name":"Review of Network Economics","volume":"89 1","pages":"239 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Issue on “Economics of Digitization”\",\"authors\":\"Paul Belleflamme, Alexandre de Cornière, Oliver Falck, A. Gautier\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rne-2018-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The process of digitization has already had a profound impact on the functioning of the markets in the last decade, and it should bring even more interesting changes in the near future. This Special Issue on the Economics of Digitization includes four selected articles, which illustrate the implications of various aspects of digitization for consumers and firms. The analysis of price discrimination has recently taken a new – and very interesting – turn, almost one century after the concept was formally introduced (Pigou proposed the first taxonomy of price discrimination practices in his book “Economics of Welfare” in 1920). The reason for this renewed interest is to be found in the continuously decreasing costs of processing data and in improved data algorithms, which allow firms to know much more about their consumers’ willingness to pay. These technological developments have four important consequences for the economic analysis of price discrimination. First, perfect price discrimination is no longer seen as a theoretical benchmark but as a true possibility. Second, as consumers care about their privacy and can act to protect it, they become strategic players, meaning that firms must factor in the consumers’ potential reactions when they choose their pricing strategy. Third, as more firms can easily collect and process data, a more careful examination of competitive price discrimination is called for. Finally, as data is the necessary input for price discrimination, it becomes a commodity, whose trade needs to be analyzed. The article by Alexandre de Cornière and Rodrigo Montes (Consumer Privacy and the Incentives to Price-Discriminate in Online Markets) contributes to the first two issues: it studies the interaction between a monopoly firm, which can (imperfectly) identify consumers’ willingness to pay, and consumers, who can prevent\",\"PeriodicalId\":45659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"239 - 241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Network Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2018-0029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Network Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2018-0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去的十年里,数字化的进程已经对市场的运作产生了深远的影响,在不久的将来,它应该会带来更多有趣的变化。本期《数字化经济学》特刊精选了四篇文章,阐述了数字化对消费者和企业的各个方面的影响。在价格歧视这一概念被正式引入近一个世纪之后,对价格歧视的分析最近出现了一个新的、非常有趣的转折(庇古在1920年的《福利经济学》一书中首次提出了价格歧视的分类)。这种重新引起兴趣的原因在于数据处理成本的不断降低和数据算法的改进,这使得企业能够更多地了解消费者的支付意愿。这些技术发展对价格歧视的经济分析有四个重要影响。首先,完全价格歧视不再被视为理论基准,而是一种真实的可能性。其次,由于消费者关心自己的隐私,并能采取行动保护隐私,他们成为了战略参与者,这意味着企业在选择定价策略时必须考虑到消费者的潜在反应。第三,由于越来越多的公司可以轻松地收集和处理数据,因此需要对竞争性价格歧视进行更仔细的检查。最后,由于数据是价格歧视的必要输入,因此它成为一种商品,需要对其交易进行分析。Alexandre de cornires和Rodrigo Montes的文章(《在线市场中的消费者隐私和价格歧视动机》)对前两个问题做出了贡献:它研究了垄断公司(可以(不完全)识别消费者的支付意愿)和消费者(可以阻止)之间的相互作用
The process of digitization has already had a profound impact on the functioning of the markets in the last decade, and it should bring even more interesting changes in the near future. This Special Issue on the Economics of Digitization includes four selected articles, which illustrate the implications of various aspects of digitization for consumers and firms. The analysis of price discrimination has recently taken a new – and very interesting – turn, almost one century after the concept was formally introduced (Pigou proposed the first taxonomy of price discrimination practices in his book “Economics of Welfare” in 1920). The reason for this renewed interest is to be found in the continuously decreasing costs of processing data and in improved data algorithms, which allow firms to know much more about their consumers’ willingness to pay. These technological developments have four important consequences for the economic analysis of price discrimination. First, perfect price discrimination is no longer seen as a theoretical benchmark but as a true possibility. Second, as consumers care about their privacy and can act to protect it, they become strategic players, meaning that firms must factor in the consumers’ potential reactions when they choose their pricing strategy. Third, as more firms can easily collect and process data, a more careful examination of competitive price discrimination is called for. Finally, as data is the necessary input for price discrimination, it becomes a commodity, whose trade needs to be analyzed. The article by Alexandre de Cornière and Rodrigo Montes (Consumer Privacy and the Incentives to Price-Discriminate in Online Markets) contributes to the first two issues: it studies the interaction between a monopoly firm, which can (imperfectly) identify consumers’ willingness to pay, and consumers, who can prevent
期刊介绍:
The Review of Network Economics seeks to help policy makers, academics, and practitioners keep informed of new research and policy debate in network economics and related subjects that are relevant to the study of network industries. By publishing high quality research on topical issues relevant to network industries, it is hoped readers will be able to gain a deeper understanding of the economic issues involved and that this will improve the quality of decision making by private and public organisations, and debate among researchers. The articles can cover specific network industries, or may deal with general issues that have relevance to a number of different network industries, including topics in the economics of networks, regulation, competition law, or industrial organisation. Papers that provide insights into policy debates are especially welcome, as are up-to-date surveys, book reviews, and comments.