{"title":"学科文化与国际研究网络的参与:科学传播实践和动机如何与语境因素相关","authors":"E. Silva, Sandra Pinto","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2022.2162831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been an increasing call for more public engagement of scientists, and this happens in parallel with a rising internationalization of research. Willingness to communicate is explained by attitudes (ideas and perceptions about science communication), but is also the result of a combination of personal and contextual factors. Disciplinary cultures have been pointed out as important factors in explaining communication practices. Our hypothesis is that the way scientists view and engage in science communication is related to their scientific discipline, but also to a participation in international networks. The internationalization of scientists has been found to impact their human capital, which is constituted also by ideas and beliefs, which are also related to science communication. A survey was responded by 524 researchers from nine Portuguese scientific institutions and research groups. We found that disciplinary cultures are relevant factors to explain differences in the perceptions about science communication and reasons to communicate, namely those related to extrinsic motivations. Disciplinary cultures were also found to mediate the impact of internationalization on ideas about science communication. Internationalization in the whole group of researchers was found to be positively associated with communication practices targeting different audiences.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"7 1","pages":"245 - 260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disciplinary cultures and participation in international research networks: how science communication practices and motivation relate to contextual factors\",\"authors\":\"E. Silva, Sandra Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548455.2022.2162831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been an increasing call for more public engagement of scientists, and this happens in parallel with a rising internationalization of research. Willingness to communicate is explained by attitudes (ideas and perceptions about science communication), but is also the result of a combination of personal and contextual factors. Disciplinary cultures have been pointed out as important factors in explaining communication practices. Our hypothesis is that the way scientists view and engage in science communication is related to their scientific discipline, but also to a participation in international networks. The internationalization of scientists has been found to impact their human capital, which is constituted also by ideas and beliefs, which are also related to science communication. A survey was responded by 524 researchers from nine Portuguese scientific institutions and research groups. We found that disciplinary cultures are relevant factors to explain differences in the perceptions about science communication and reasons to communicate, namely those related to extrinsic motivations. Disciplinary cultures were also found to mediate the impact of internationalization on ideas about science communication. Internationalization in the whole group of researchers was found to be positively associated with communication practices targeting different audiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"245 - 260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2162831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2162831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disciplinary cultures and participation in international research networks: how science communication practices and motivation relate to contextual factors
ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been an increasing call for more public engagement of scientists, and this happens in parallel with a rising internationalization of research. Willingness to communicate is explained by attitudes (ideas and perceptions about science communication), but is also the result of a combination of personal and contextual factors. Disciplinary cultures have been pointed out as important factors in explaining communication practices. Our hypothesis is that the way scientists view and engage in science communication is related to their scientific discipline, but also to a participation in international networks. The internationalization of scientists has been found to impact their human capital, which is constituted also by ideas and beliefs, which are also related to science communication. A survey was responded by 524 researchers from nine Portuguese scientific institutions and research groups. We found that disciplinary cultures are relevant factors to explain differences in the perceptions about science communication and reasons to communicate, namely those related to extrinsic motivations. Disciplinary cultures were also found to mediate the impact of internationalization on ideas about science communication. Internationalization in the whole group of researchers was found to be positively associated with communication practices targeting different audiences.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life