助听器使用者的聆听努力:它与助听器的使用和满意度有关吗?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-31 DOI:10.1055/a-1865-3449
Samet Kiliç, Öznur Yiğit, Meral D Türkyilmaz
{"title":"助听器使用者的聆听努力:它与助听器的使用和满意度有关吗?","authors":"Samet Kiliç, Öznur Yiğit, Meral D Türkyilmaz","doi":"10.1055/a-1865-3449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Listening effort is primarily reflective of real-world performance. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the listening effort to predict the performance of hearing aid (HA) users in their daily lives.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> This study aimed to investigate the relationship between listening effort, daily HA use time, and HA satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> This is a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Thirty-three bilateral behind-the-ear HA users (17 females and 16 males) between 19 and 37 years were participated. All participants had bilateral, symmetric, moderate sensorineural hearing loss and at least 6 months of experience using HAs. The pure-tone average thresholds (PTA) of the participants' left and right ears were 55.34 ± 4.38 and 54.85 ± 5.05, respectively.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> First, daily HA use times of the last 30 days were derived from data logging. Second, participants were asked to fill in the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale questionnaire (SADL). Lastly, participants performed the dual-task paradigm to evaluate listening effort. The dual-task paradigm consisted of a primary speech recognition task that included three different individualized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, that is, SNR100, SNR80, and SNR50, which the participant could understand 100, 80, and 50% of the speech, respectively. The secondary task was a visual reaction time task that required participants to press the key in response to a visual probe (an image of a white or red rectangle). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to model the effect of factors (daily HA use time and HA satisfaction) on reaction times (RT) of each three individualized SNR sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Mean daily HA use time of the participants was 5.72 ± 4.14 hours. Mean RTs of SNR50, SNR80, and SNR100 conditions were 1,050.61 ± 286.49, 893.33 ± 274.79, and 815.45 ± 233.22 ms, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that daily HA use time and HA satisfaction are significantly related to listening effort in all SNR conditions. For SNR80 condition; F (2,30) = 47.699, <i>p</i> < 0.001, with an adjusted <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of 0.745.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> As far as we know, this study is the first to demonstrate a strong link between listening effort, daily HA use time, and HA satisfaction. Evaluating listening effort following the HA fitting session may provide preliminary information about the treatment success of HA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Users: Is It Related to Hearing Aid Use and Satisfaction?\",\"authors\":\"Samet Kiliç, Öznur Yiğit, Meral D Türkyilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1865-3449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Listening effort is primarily reflective of real-world performance. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the listening effort to predict the performance of hearing aid (HA) users in their daily lives.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> This study aimed to investigate the relationship between listening effort, daily HA use time, and HA satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> This is a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Thirty-three bilateral behind-the-ear HA users (17 females and 16 males) between 19 and 37 years were participated. All participants had bilateral, symmetric, moderate sensorineural hearing loss and at least 6 months of experience using HAs. The pure-tone average thresholds (PTA) of the participants' left and right ears were 55.34 ± 4.38 and 54.85 ± 5.05, respectively.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> First, daily HA use times of the last 30 days were derived from data logging. Second, participants were asked to fill in the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale questionnaire (SADL). Lastly, participants performed the dual-task paradigm to evaluate listening effort. The dual-task paradigm consisted of a primary speech recognition task that included three different individualized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, that is, SNR100, SNR80, and SNR50, which the participant could understand 100, 80, and 50% of the speech, respectively. The secondary task was a visual reaction time task that required participants to press the key in response to a visual probe (an image of a white or red rectangle). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to model the effect of factors (daily HA use time and HA satisfaction) on reaction times (RT) of each three individualized SNR sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Mean daily HA use time of the participants was 5.72 ± 4.14 hours. Mean RTs of SNR50, SNR80, and SNR100 conditions were 1,050.61 ± 286.49, 893.33 ± 274.79, and 815.45 ± 233.22 ms, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that daily HA use time and HA satisfaction are significantly related to listening effort in all SNR conditions. For SNR80 condition; F (2,30) = 47.699, <i>p</i> < 0.001, with an adjusted <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of 0.745.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> As far as we know, this study is the first to demonstrate a strong link between listening effort, daily HA use time, and HA satisfaction. Evaluating listening effort following the HA fitting session may provide preliminary information about the treatment success of HA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1865-3449\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1865-3449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:聆听强度主要反映真实世界的表现。目的:本研究旨在调查聆听强度、助听器日常使用时间和助听器满意度之间的关系:本研究为横断面研究:研究样本:33 名双侧耳后助听器使用者(17 名女性和 16 名男性),年龄在 19 岁至 37 岁之间。所有参与者均为双侧、对称、中度感音神经性听力损失,且至少有 6 个月的耳后助听器使用经验。参与者左耳和右耳的纯音平均阈值(PTA)分别为(55.34 ± 4.38)和(54.85 ± 5.05):首先,从数据记录中得出过去 30 天每天使用 HA 的时间。其次,要求参与者填写 "日常生活扩音满意度量表"(SADL)问卷。最后,参与者进行双任务范式来评估听力强度。双任务范式包括一项主要语音识别任务,其中包括三种不同的个性化信噪比(SNR)条件,即 SNR100、SNR80 和 SNR50,受试者分别能听懂 100、80 和 50% 的语音。次要任务是一项视觉反应时间任务,要求受试者根据视觉探针(白色或红色矩形图像)按下按键。我们使用多元线性回归分析来模拟各因素(HA每日使用时间和HA满意度)对三个个性化SNR环节反应时间(RT)的影响:结果:参与者每天使用 HA 的平均时间为 5.72 ± 4.14 小时。SNR50、SNR80和SNR100条件下的平均反应时间分别为(1,050.61 ± 286.49)、(893.33 ± 274.79)和(815.45 ± 233.22)毫秒。多元线性回归分析表明,在所有信噪比条件下,每天使用 HA 的时间和 HA 的满意度都与聆听强度有显著关系。对于 SNR80 条件;F (2,30) = 47.699,p R 2 为 0.745:据我们所知,这项研究首次证明了聆听强度、HA 日常使用时间和 HA 满意度之间的密切联系。在HA试戴疗程后评估听力努力程度,可为HA治疗成功与否提供初步信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Users: Is It Related to Hearing Aid Use and Satisfaction?

Background:  Listening effort is primarily reflective of real-world performance. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the listening effort to predict the performance of hearing aid (HA) users in their daily lives.

Purpose:  This study aimed to investigate the relationship between listening effort, daily HA use time, and HA satisfaction.

Research design:  This is a cross-sectional study.

Study sample:  Thirty-three bilateral behind-the-ear HA users (17 females and 16 males) between 19 and 37 years were participated. All participants had bilateral, symmetric, moderate sensorineural hearing loss and at least 6 months of experience using HAs. The pure-tone average thresholds (PTA) of the participants' left and right ears were 55.34 ± 4.38 and 54.85 ± 5.05, respectively.

Data collection and analysis:  First, daily HA use times of the last 30 days were derived from data logging. Second, participants were asked to fill in the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life Scale questionnaire (SADL). Lastly, participants performed the dual-task paradigm to evaluate listening effort. The dual-task paradigm consisted of a primary speech recognition task that included three different individualized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, that is, SNR100, SNR80, and SNR50, which the participant could understand 100, 80, and 50% of the speech, respectively. The secondary task was a visual reaction time task that required participants to press the key in response to a visual probe (an image of a white or red rectangle). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to model the effect of factors (daily HA use time and HA satisfaction) on reaction times (RT) of each three individualized SNR sessions.

Results:  Mean daily HA use time of the participants was 5.72 ± 4.14 hours. Mean RTs of SNR50, SNR80, and SNR100 conditions were 1,050.61 ± 286.49, 893.33 ± 274.79, and 815.45 ± 233.22 ms, respectively. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that daily HA use time and HA satisfaction are significantly related to listening effort in all SNR conditions. For SNR80 condition; F (2,30) = 47.699, p < 0.001, with an adjusted R 2 of 0.745.

Conclusion:  As far as we know, this study is the first to demonstrate a strong link between listening effort, daily HA use time, and HA satisfaction. Evaluating listening effort following the HA fitting session may provide preliminary information about the treatment success of HA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信