自卫阅读

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andy Hines
{"title":"自卫阅读","authors":"Andy Hines","doi":"10.5325/reception.13.1.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay traces the impact of the wider ideological landscape regarding “identity politics,” interpretive practice, and literature of the 1970s on Judith Fetterley’s The Resisting Reader. Specifically, it tracks the traces of Black and women of color feminist organizing legible in Fetterley’s text, as well as those left by social movements operating at the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. Though these traces go unattributed, this article argues that their presence offers an opportunity to read, as Fetterley might put it, a closed system from “without.” The author’s resistant reading of Fetterley’s text suggests how her “radical feminism” calls for a distinct attention to the materialist operations of academic and literary institutions in an investigation of their racialized, patriarchal power.","PeriodicalId":40584,"journal":{"name":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","volume":"24 1","pages":"15 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading for Self-Defense\",\"authors\":\"Andy Hines\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/reception.13.1.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:This essay traces the impact of the wider ideological landscape regarding “identity politics,” interpretive practice, and literature of the 1970s on Judith Fetterley’s The Resisting Reader. Specifically, it tracks the traces of Black and women of color feminist organizing legible in Fetterley’s text, as well as those left by social movements operating at the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. Though these traces go unattributed, this article argues that their presence offers an opportunity to read, as Fetterley might put it, a closed system from “without.” The author’s resistant reading of Fetterley’s text suggests how her “radical feminism” calls for a distinct attention to the materialist operations of academic and literary institutions in an investigation of their racialized, patriarchal power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/reception.13.1.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/reception.13.1.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文追溯了20世纪70年代关于“身份政治”的更广泛的意识形态景观、解释实践和文学对朱迪思·费特利的《抗拒的读者》的影响。具体来说,它追踪了黑人和有色人种女性女权主义组织的痕迹,这些痕迹在费特利的文本中清晰可见,以及1971年在宾夕法尼亚大学开展的社会运动留下的痕迹。虽然这些痕迹没有署名,但本文认为,它们的存在提供了一个机会,正如费特利可能会说的那样,从“外部”阅读一个封闭的系统。作者对费特利文本的抗拒性阅读表明,她的“激进女权主义”如何在调查学术和文学机构的种族化、父权权力时,呼吁对其唯物主义运作的独特关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reading for Self-Defense
abstract:This essay traces the impact of the wider ideological landscape regarding “identity politics,” interpretive practice, and literature of the 1970s on Judith Fetterley’s The Resisting Reader. Specifically, it tracks the traces of Black and women of color feminist organizing legible in Fetterley’s text, as well as those left by social movements operating at the University of Pennsylvania in 1971. Though these traces go unattributed, this article argues that their presence offers an opportunity to read, as Fetterley might put it, a closed system from “without.” The author’s resistant reading of Fetterley’s text suggests how her “radical feminism” calls for a distinct attention to the materialist operations of academic and literary institutions in an investigation of their racialized, patriarchal power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History
Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Reception: Texts, Readers, Audiences, History is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal published once a year. It seeks to promote dialog and discussion among scholars engaged in theoretical and practical analyses in several related fields: reader-response criticism and pedagogy, reception study, history of reading and the book, audience and communication studies, institutional studies and histories, as well as interpretive strategies related to feminism, race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality, and postcolonial studies, focusing mainly but not exclusively on the literature, culture, and media of England and the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信