通过联合分析,联合医疗专业人员对理想的跨专业教育计划的偏好

Maria Julita S. J. Sibayan
{"title":"通过联合分析,联合医疗专业人员对理想的跨专业教育计划的偏好","authors":"Maria Julita S. J. Sibayan","doi":"10.35974/ISC.V6I1.1422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To shape competent healthcare professionals, a working educational system that facilitates multiprofessional and interprofessional partnership should be in place to foster and deliver better outcomes efficiently, enhancing the quality of healthcare education. Interprofessional Education (IPE) is learning and teaching approach where two or more healthcare professions learn with, from, and about each other. To meet the objective, academic reform that encompasses silos and profession centrism has to be instituted. This study delved into the proclivity of medical and paramedical professionals towards a curricular program that concretizes and strengthens interprofessional collaboration in practice via Conjoint Analysis. Orthogonal Array was employed to elucidate validity and applicability of the five attributes namely Content, Participants, Setting, Teaching Methods, and Format. One hundred allied healthcare professionals representing 25 countries from three international universities participated in the study. Results revealed that setting was the major factor considered when choosing an IPE program with a relative importance of 43.7%.  It was followed by content with a relative importance of 15.8%.  Trailing behind were teaching methods (14.5%) and participants (13.1%), respectively. The stakeholders’ perspectives will serve as a benchmark for a program to be implemented on the Philippine context in line with the ASEAN integration which is currently being embraced.","PeriodicalId":7363,"journal":{"name":"Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predilections of Allied Healthcare Professionals toward an Ideal Interprofessional Education Program via Conjoint Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Maria Julita S. J. Sibayan\",\"doi\":\"10.35974/ISC.V6I1.1422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To shape competent healthcare professionals, a working educational system that facilitates multiprofessional and interprofessional partnership should be in place to foster and deliver better outcomes efficiently, enhancing the quality of healthcare education. Interprofessional Education (IPE) is learning and teaching approach where two or more healthcare professions learn with, from, and about each other. To meet the objective, academic reform that encompasses silos and profession centrism has to be instituted. This study delved into the proclivity of medical and paramedical professionals towards a curricular program that concretizes and strengthens interprofessional collaboration in practice via Conjoint Analysis. Orthogonal Array was employed to elucidate validity and applicability of the five attributes namely Content, Participants, Setting, Teaching Methods, and Format. One hundred allied healthcare professionals representing 25 countries from three international universities participated in the study. Results revealed that setting was the major factor considered when choosing an IPE program with a relative importance of 43.7%.  It was followed by content with a relative importance of 15.8%.  Trailing behind were teaching methods (14.5%) and participants (13.1%), respectively. The stakeholders’ perspectives will serve as a benchmark for a program to be implemented on the Philippine context in line with the ASEAN integration which is currently being embraced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35974/ISC.V6I1.1422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35974/ISC.V6I1.1422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要培养合格的医护专业人员,必须建立一个行之有效的教育制度,促进多专业和跨专业的伙伴关系,从而有效地培养和提供更好的结果,提高医护教育的质量。跨专业教育(IPE)是两个或多个医疗保健专业人员相互学习、相互学习和相互了解的学习和教学方法。为了实现这一目标,必须进行包括“竖井”和专业中心主义在内的学术改革。本研究深入探讨了医学和辅助医学专业人员对课程计划的倾向,该课程计划通过联合分析具体化并加强了实践中的跨专业合作。采用正交试验法对内容、参与者、设置、教学方法、格式五个属性的效度和适用性进行分析。来自三所国际大学的25个国家的100名专职医疗保健专业人员参与了这项研究。结果显示,环境是选择IPE课程时考虑的主要因素,相对重要性为43.7%。其次是内容,相对重要性为15.8%。其次是教学方法(14.5%)和参与者(13.1%)。利益相关者的观点将作为在菲律宾实施符合目前正在接受的东盟一体化的方案的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predilections of Allied Healthcare Professionals toward an Ideal Interprofessional Education Program via Conjoint Analysis
To shape competent healthcare professionals, a working educational system that facilitates multiprofessional and interprofessional partnership should be in place to foster and deliver better outcomes efficiently, enhancing the quality of healthcare education. Interprofessional Education (IPE) is learning and teaching approach where two or more healthcare professions learn with, from, and about each other. To meet the objective, academic reform that encompasses silos and profession centrism has to be instituted. This study delved into the proclivity of medical and paramedical professionals towards a curricular program that concretizes and strengthens interprofessional collaboration in practice via Conjoint Analysis. Orthogonal Array was employed to elucidate validity and applicability of the five attributes namely Content, Participants, Setting, Teaching Methods, and Format. One hundred allied healthcare professionals representing 25 countries from three international universities participated in the study. Results revealed that setting was the major factor considered when choosing an IPE program with a relative importance of 43.7%.  It was followed by content with a relative importance of 15.8%.  Trailing behind were teaching methods (14.5%) and participants (13.1%), respectively. The stakeholders’ perspectives will serve as a benchmark for a program to be implemented on the Philippine context in line with the ASEAN integration which is currently being embraced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信