在生态学中应用生物栽培研究方案:来自澳大利亚的内部和外部经验

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Patrick Cooke, Monica Fahey, Emilie J. Ens, Margaret Raven, Philip A. Clarke, Maurizio Rossetto, Gerry Turpin
{"title":"在生态学中应用生物栽培研究方案:来自澳大利亚的内部和外部经验","authors":"Patrick Cooke,&nbsp;Monica Fahey,&nbsp;Emilie J. Ens,&nbsp;Margaret Raven,&nbsp;Philip A. Clarke,&nbsp;Maurizio Rossetto,&nbsp;Gerry Turpin","doi":"10.1111/emr.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Collaborations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous scientific researchers are increasingly mandated by global to local conservation policy and research ethics guidelines. Breakdowns occur due to misunderstandings around expected protocols of engagement and cooperation, which are compounded by lack of broader awareness of differences in cultural values, priorities and knowledge systems. Using first-hand experiences, we outline eight key protocols and guidelines that researchers should consider when undertaking research with Indigenous peoples, or on Indigenous Country, through exploration of biocultural protocols and guidelines within Australian and Indigenous customary laws. We use the onion as a metaphor to highlight the layers of protocols and guidelines that researchers can peel back to guide their research from international to local scales, with ethics around the research question at the core. This paper draws on the perspectives and experiences of an Indigenous researcher (as ‘insider’/‘outsider’) and non-Indigenous researcher (‘outsider’), working on a cross-cultural and multidisciplinary investigation of past Aboriginal dispersal of rainforest trees on the Australian east coast. <i>This paper is part of the special issue ‘Indigenous and cross-cultural ecology - perspectives from Australia’ published in</i> Ecological Management &amp; Restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 S1","pages":"64-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12545","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying biocultural research protocols in ecology: Insider and outsider experiences from Australia\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Cooke,&nbsp;Monica Fahey,&nbsp;Emilie J. Ens,&nbsp;Margaret Raven,&nbsp;Philip A. Clarke,&nbsp;Maurizio Rossetto,&nbsp;Gerry Turpin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Collaborations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous scientific researchers are increasingly mandated by global to local conservation policy and research ethics guidelines. Breakdowns occur due to misunderstandings around expected protocols of engagement and cooperation, which are compounded by lack of broader awareness of differences in cultural values, priorities and knowledge systems. Using first-hand experiences, we outline eight key protocols and guidelines that researchers should consider when undertaking research with Indigenous peoples, or on Indigenous Country, through exploration of biocultural protocols and guidelines within Australian and Indigenous customary laws. We use the onion as a metaphor to highlight the layers of protocols and guidelines that researchers can peel back to guide their research from international to local scales, with ethics around the research question at the core. This paper draws on the perspectives and experiences of an Indigenous researcher (as ‘insider’/‘outsider’) and non-Indigenous researcher (‘outsider’), working on a cross-cultural and multidisciplinary investigation of past Aboriginal dispersal of rainforest trees on the Australian east coast. <i>This paper is part of the special issue ‘Indigenous and cross-cultural ecology - perspectives from Australia’ published in</i> Ecological Management &amp; Restoration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":\"23 S1\",\"pages\":\"64-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12545\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12545\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

全球到地方的保护政策和研究伦理准则越来越多地要求土著和非土著科学研究人员之间的合作。失败的发生是由于对预期的接触和合作协议的误解,而对文化价值观、优先事项和知识体系的差异缺乏更广泛的认识,使情况更加复杂。利用第一手经验,我们通过探索澳大利亚和土著习惯法中的生物文化协议和指南,概述了研究人员在与土著人民或土著国家进行研究时应该考虑的八项关键协议和指南。我们用洋葱作为一个隐喻来强调研究人员可以剥离的协议和指导方针的层次,以指导他们从国际到当地的研究,以围绕研究问题的伦理为核心。本文借鉴了土著研究者(作为“局内人”/“局外人”)和非土著研究者(“局外人”)的观点和经验,他们对澳大利亚东海岸过去土著雨林树木的分散进行了跨文化和多学科调查。这篇论文是发表在《生态管理》杂志上的特刊《土著和跨文化生态学——来自澳大利亚的视角》的一部分。恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Applying biocultural research protocols in ecology: Insider and outsider experiences from Australia

Applying biocultural research protocols in ecology: Insider and outsider experiences from Australia

Collaborations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous scientific researchers are increasingly mandated by global to local conservation policy and research ethics guidelines. Breakdowns occur due to misunderstandings around expected protocols of engagement and cooperation, which are compounded by lack of broader awareness of differences in cultural values, priorities and knowledge systems. Using first-hand experiences, we outline eight key protocols and guidelines that researchers should consider when undertaking research with Indigenous peoples, or on Indigenous Country, through exploration of biocultural protocols and guidelines within Australian and Indigenous customary laws. We use the onion as a metaphor to highlight the layers of protocols and guidelines that researchers can peel back to guide their research from international to local scales, with ethics around the research question at the core. This paper draws on the perspectives and experiences of an Indigenous researcher (as ‘insider’/‘outsider’) and non-Indigenous researcher (‘outsider’), working on a cross-cultural and multidisciplinary investigation of past Aboriginal dispersal of rainforest trees on the Australian east coast. This paper is part of the special issue ‘Indigenous and cross-cultural ecology - perspectives from Australia’ published in Ecological Management & Restoration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信