发展中的矛盾:印度经济的增长与危机

Q4 Social Sciences
Kalim Siddiqui
{"title":"发展中的矛盾:印度经济的增长与危机","authors":"Kalim Siddiqui","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.265084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 5% in the 1980s to around 10% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to less than half that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of the reform measures on economic growth and poverty. Because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. It seems that India’s growth has been led by the services sector, which includes real estates, IT, telecommunications, and banking, which contributes nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of the India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.","PeriodicalId":39877,"journal":{"name":"Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"82-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contradictions In Development: Growth And Crisis In Indian Economy\",\"authors\":\"Kalim Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.265084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 5% in the 1980s to around 10% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to less than half that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of the reform measures on economic growth and poverty. Because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. It seems that India’s growth has been led by the services sector, which includes real estates, IT, telecommunications, and banking, which contributes nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of the India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"82-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.265084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.265084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

自市场化改革启动以来,印度经济从20世纪80年代的5%增长到2011年的10%左右,然后在近年来急剧放缓至不到这一增长率的一半。从改革启动到2011年,它确实表现出一些生动而令人印象深刻的迹象,表明印度正朝着高增长和人口生活条件改善的方向发展。本文的目的是了解改革措施对经济增长和贫困的可能影响。因为主流的做法表明,改革可以预期提高经济增长和收入。印度的经济增长似乎是由服务业主导的,其中包括房地产、It、电信和银行业,2012年服务业对GDP的贡献接近50%。在东亚经济体中经历了显著增长和转型的制造业,其增长速度要慢得多。农业部门雇佣了印度近三分之二的劳动力,但仍然停滞不前。该研究表明,印度忽视了教育和卫生,这将损害生产力和经济增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contradictions In Development: Growth And Crisis In Indian Economy
Since the pro-market reforms were launched, the Indian economy has grown from 5% in the 1980s to around 10% in 2011 before slowing down dramatically to less than half that rate in recent years. From launching of reforms until 2011, it did manifest some vivid and impressive signs of India moving towards high growth and increase in living conditions of its population. The purpose of this article is to access the likely effects of the reform measures on economic growth and poverty. Because the mainstream approach suggests that the reforms can be expected to increase economic growth and incomes. It seems that India’s growth has been led by the services sector, which includes real estates, IT, telecommunications, and banking, which contributes nearly 50% to the GDP in 2012. Manufacturing, which experienced remarkable growth and transformation in the East Asian economies, had rather grown much slower. The agriculture sector, which still employs nearly two-third of the India’s workforce, remains stagnant. The study suggests that education and health have been neglected in India and this will compromise productivity and growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies
Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信