一件值得记住的事情:1965年,威诺克

Tom F. S. McFeat
{"title":"一件值得记住的事情:1965年,威诺克","authors":"Tom F. S. McFeat","doi":"10.7202/1084161ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the exclusion of their children from the\nnearby Anglo high school in June 1965, a series of events\noccurred at the reserve community of Winoque which\nculminated in an apparently unrelated dispute over the\nproposed use of band funds to secure independence from\nthe town.\n The community had been divided between two\nfactions, self-defined as crowds. The leader of the crowd I\nidentified as Restricters was the chief; the leader of the\nother crowd I identified as Extenders would be that\nchiefs opposition in the November elections.\n Crowds then, were in part ideologically committed to\naction at the Indian/non Indian boundary. Restricters\nidealized this as a barrier or void whereas Extenders\nidealized it as a path or boundary zone. Put to the test in\nthe issue of whether the community should send its\nchildren back to the high school, if invited, the crowds\nwere forced to modify positions in the face of public\nopinion.","PeriodicalId":84519,"journal":{"name":"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Affair to Remember: Winoque, 1965\",\"authors\":\"Tom F. S. McFeat\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1084161ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the exclusion of their children from the\\nnearby Anglo high school in June 1965, a series of events\\noccurred at the reserve community of Winoque which\\nculminated in an apparently unrelated dispute over the\\nproposed use of band funds to secure independence from\\nthe town.\\n The community had been divided between two\\nfactions, self-defined as crowds. The leader of the crowd I\\nidentified as Restricters was the chief; the leader of the\\nother crowd I identified as Extenders would be that\\nchiefs opposition in the November elections.\\n Crowds then, were in part ideologically committed to\\naction at the Indian/non Indian boundary. Restricters\\nidealized this as a barrier or void whereas Extenders\\nidealized it as a path or boundary zone. Put to the test in\\nthe issue of whether the community should send its\\nchildren back to the high school, if invited, the crowds\\nwere forced to modify positions in the face of public\\nopinion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1084161ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture (Canadian Ethnology Society)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1084161ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1965年6月,他们的孩子被附近的盎格鲁高中拒之外,随后在威诺克保留地发生了一系列事件,最终导致了一场明显无关的争议,争议的焦点是如何使用乐队基金以确保从城镇独立出来。这个社区已经分裂为两个派别,他们自定义为群体。我认出那群人的头头是“限流者”;另一群我认为是扩展者的人的领袖将是11月选举的主要反对派。当时的人群在某种程度上意识形态上致力于在印度/非印度边界采取行动。限制性将其作为屏障或空隙,而扩张性将其作为路径或边界区。在社区是否应该送孩子回高中的问题上,如果被邀请,群众被迫在公众舆论面前改变立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Affair to Remember: Winoque, 1965
Following the exclusion of their children from the nearby Anglo high school in June 1965, a series of events occurred at the reserve community of Winoque which culminated in an apparently unrelated dispute over the proposed use of band funds to secure independence from the town. The community had been divided between two factions, self-defined as crowds. The leader of the crowd I identified as Restricters was the chief; the leader of the other crowd I identified as Extenders would be that chiefs opposition in the November elections. Crowds then, were in part ideologically committed to action at the Indian/non Indian boundary. Restricters idealized this as a barrier or void whereas Extenders idealized it as a path or boundary zone. Put to the test in the issue of whether the community should send its children back to the high school, if invited, the crowds were forced to modify positions in the face of public opinion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信