核热机结构可靠性评估与健康监测系统

Q4 Engineering
Samantha Rawlins, L. Thomas
{"title":"核热机结构可靠性评估与健康监测系统","authors":"Samantha Rawlins, L. Thomas","doi":"10.59332/jbis-076-04-0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today’s space nuclear technology programs are often confronted with two fundamental challenges early in the project life cycle: 1) development and testing will be more expensive than a non-nuclear alternative, and 2) the consequences of failure will be more severe. As a result, many space nuclear programs have been designed to minimize testing and maximize their probability of success: their reliability. The United States' Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications Program recognized these facts early on, and by 1961 the program’s primary objective set safety and reliability as the overriding considerations. This focus on reliability greatly influenced the engine's design towards minimizing the possible number of catastrophic failures modes. As such, the final configuration heavily relied on duplicate components for redundancy, including duplicate turbopumps. Despite these efforts, at program cancellation in 1972, the non-nuclear subsystem only achieved a mission predicted reliability of 33%. Some of the most significant contributions to rocket engine reliability in the last 50 years have been from advancements in the Health Monitoring System (HMS). Through rigorous instrumentation and control an engine's HMS has the potential to convert over 90% of a system's catastrophic failure modes to a safe shutdown situation. Due to this, many modern rocket engine designs no longer require redundant components and can prioritize performance-enhancing configurations over those that inherently minimize failure modes. Unfortunately, a standard liquid rocket engine HMS will likely not be compatible with a nuclear rocket engine (NRE). The HMS for a liquid rocket engine most often prevents catastrophic failure by shutting off flow to the combustion chamber. This would not work for a NRE, as removing propellant flow to the reactor could result in reactor overheating and meltdown. Maintaining flow to the reactor is often essential for safe NRE operation, such that reliance on an advanced HMS system alone may not be sufficient. This work investigates the feasibility of an NRE HMS by comparing the HMS designs for liquid rocket engines and terrestrial nuclear power plants and evaluates the necessity for redundant components to maximize overall system reliability. Keywords: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion, Nuclear Rocket Engine, Reliability, Fault Prevention, Fault Tolerance, Turbopump","PeriodicalId":54906,"journal":{"name":"Jbis-Journal of the British Interplanetary Society","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability Assessment of Nuclear Thermal Engine Configuration and Health Monitoring System\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Rawlins, L. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.59332/jbis-076-04-0145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today’s space nuclear technology programs are often confronted with two fundamental challenges early in the project life cycle: 1) development and testing will be more expensive than a non-nuclear alternative, and 2) the consequences of failure will be more severe. As a result, many space nuclear programs have been designed to minimize testing and maximize their probability of success: their reliability. The United States' Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications Program recognized these facts early on, and by 1961 the program’s primary objective set safety and reliability as the overriding considerations. This focus on reliability greatly influenced the engine's design towards minimizing the possible number of catastrophic failures modes. As such, the final configuration heavily relied on duplicate components for redundancy, including duplicate turbopumps. Despite these efforts, at program cancellation in 1972, the non-nuclear subsystem only achieved a mission predicted reliability of 33%. Some of the most significant contributions to rocket engine reliability in the last 50 years have been from advancements in the Health Monitoring System (HMS). Through rigorous instrumentation and control an engine's HMS has the potential to convert over 90% of a system's catastrophic failure modes to a safe shutdown situation. Due to this, many modern rocket engine designs no longer require redundant components and can prioritize performance-enhancing configurations over those that inherently minimize failure modes. Unfortunately, a standard liquid rocket engine HMS will likely not be compatible with a nuclear rocket engine (NRE). The HMS for a liquid rocket engine most often prevents catastrophic failure by shutting off flow to the combustion chamber. This would not work for a NRE, as removing propellant flow to the reactor could result in reactor overheating and meltdown. Maintaining flow to the reactor is often essential for safe NRE operation, such that reliance on an advanced HMS system alone may not be sufficient. This work investigates the feasibility of an NRE HMS by comparing the HMS designs for liquid rocket engines and terrestrial nuclear power plants and evaluates the necessity for redundant components to maximize overall system reliability. Keywords: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion, Nuclear Rocket Engine, Reliability, Fault Prevention, Fault Tolerance, Turbopump\",\"PeriodicalId\":54906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jbis-Journal of the British Interplanetary Society\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jbis-Journal of the British Interplanetary Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59332/jbis-076-04-0145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbis-Journal of the British Interplanetary Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59332/jbis-076-04-0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

今天的空间核技术项目在项目生命周期的早期经常面临两个基本挑战:1)开发和测试将比非核替代方案更昂贵,2)失败的后果将更加严重。因此,许多太空核项目的设计都是为了尽量减少测试,最大限度地提高成功的可能性,即提高可靠性。美国的火箭运载工具核动力应用计划很早就认识到了这些事实,到1961年,该计划的主要目标将安全性和可靠性作为首要考虑因素。这种对可靠性的关注极大地影响了发动机的设计,以尽量减少可能出现的灾难性故障模式的数量。因此,最终的配置严重依赖于冗余的重复组件,包括重复的涡轮泵。尽管这些努力,在1972年计划取消时,非核子系统只达到任务预测的33%的可靠性。在过去的50年里,对火箭发动机可靠性的一些最重要的贡献来自健康监测系统(HMS)的进步。通过严格的仪器和控制,发动机HMS有可能将90%以上的系统灾难性故障模式转换为安全停机状态。因此,许多现代火箭发动机设计不再需要冗余组件,并且可以优先考虑性能增强配置,而不是那些本质上最小化故障模式的配置。不幸的是,标准的液体火箭发动机HMS很可能与核火箭发动机(NRE)不兼容。液体火箭发动机的HMS通常通过切断流向燃烧室的气流来防止灾难性故障。这对于NRE来说是行不通的,因为将推进剂流移到反应堆可能会导致反应堆过热和熔毁。维持反应堆的流量通常是安全运行的必要条件,因此仅依靠先进的HMS系统可能是不够的。本工作通过比较液体火箭发动机和地面核电站的HMS设计,研究了NRE HMS的可行性,并评估了冗余组件的必要性,以最大化整个系统的可靠性。关键词:核热推进,核火箭发动机,可靠性,故障预防,容错,涡轮泵
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability Assessment of Nuclear Thermal Engine Configuration and Health Monitoring System
Today’s space nuclear technology programs are often confronted with two fundamental challenges early in the project life cycle: 1) development and testing will be more expensive than a non-nuclear alternative, and 2) the consequences of failure will be more severe. As a result, many space nuclear programs have been designed to minimize testing and maximize their probability of success: their reliability. The United States' Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications Program recognized these facts early on, and by 1961 the program’s primary objective set safety and reliability as the overriding considerations. This focus on reliability greatly influenced the engine's design towards minimizing the possible number of catastrophic failures modes. As such, the final configuration heavily relied on duplicate components for redundancy, including duplicate turbopumps. Despite these efforts, at program cancellation in 1972, the non-nuclear subsystem only achieved a mission predicted reliability of 33%. Some of the most significant contributions to rocket engine reliability in the last 50 years have been from advancements in the Health Monitoring System (HMS). Through rigorous instrumentation and control an engine's HMS has the potential to convert over 90% of a system's catastrophic failure modes to a safe shutdown situation. Due to this, many modern rocket engine designs no longer require redundant components and can prioritize performance-enhancing configurations over those that inherently minimize failure modes. Unfortunately, a standard liquid rocket engine HMS will likely not be compatible with a nuclear rocket engine (NRE). The HMS for a liquid rocket engine most often prevents catastrophic failure by shutting off flow to the combustion chamber. This would not work for a NRE, as removing propellant flow to the reactor could result in reactor overheating and meltdown. Maintaining flow to the reactor is often essential for safe NRE operation, such that reliance on an advanced HMS system alone may not be sufficient. This work investigates the feasibility of an NRE HMS by comparing the HMS designs for liquid rocket engines and terrestrial nuclear power plants and evaluates the necessity for redundant components to maximize overall system reliability. Keywords: Nuclear Thermal Propulsion, Nuclear Rocket Engine, Reliability, Fault Prevention, Fault Tolerance, Turbopump
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jbis-Journal of the British Interplanetary Society
Jbis-Journal of the British Interplanetary Society Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the British Interplanetary Society (JBIS) is a technical scientific journal, first published in 1934. JBIS is concerned with space science and space technology. The journal is edited and published monthly in the United Kingdom by the British Interplanetary Society. Although the journal maintains high standards of rigorous peer review, the same with other journals in astronautics, it stands out as a journal willing to allow measured speculation on topics deemed to be at the frontiers of our knowledge in science. The boldness of journal in this respect, marks it out as containing often speculative but visionary papers on the subject of astronautics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信