哪种心理物理色觉测试适合用于3-9岁儿童的筛查?

Q4 Medicine
M. Pompe, B. S. Kranjc
{"title":"哪种心理物理色觉测试适合用于3-9岁儿童的筛查?","authors":"M. Pompe, B. S. Kranjc","doi":"10.6016/1021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To compare 4 psychophysical colour vision tests in children and to decide which test is most suitable for screening in pre-school and early school-age period. Methods: The first test used was a modified Ishihara plates test (Handaya Co. Ltd., Tokyo). The second test ”Colour vision testing made easy” (CVTME) (T. L. Waggoner, 1994) is also based on pseudoisochromatic plates with child-friendly symbols. The third test used was the ”Neitz test of colour vision” (WPS, 2001) and the fourth was ”Mollon-Reffin Minimalist test” (MRM) (version 0.7, 1994). In the first three tests, the child had to tell what he or she saw in the picture, whereas in the fourth test the child had to pick the coloured button among distractors. Thirty-seven children (19 girls and 18 boys) from 3–9 years of age with normal colour vision (at least one test should be performed without errors) were tested. The number of errors in each of the first 3 tests was registered, whereas in the MRM test the least saturated button distinguished among distractors was registered. Specificity was calculated for each test. Every child was also asked which was his or her favourite test. Results: 16/37 children made one or more errors in the modified Ishihara test, among them all children under the age of 5 years. Nine children made 1 error, three made 2, two made 3 and two children made 5 errors. 8/37 children made 1–3 mistakes in the CVTME test. Four children made one mistake, three made two and one child made three mistakes. All tested children made at least one mistake in the Neitz test. All gave a wrong description for the figure in the 6th position of the test. Two 3-year-old girls were not able to perform the test. The MRM test was not performed in full by 10/37 children. Most of these children made errors in the tritan colour vision axis. The highest specificity in all 3 age groups was calculated for CVTME test and MRM test. 28/37 children chose the MRM test as their favourite. Conclusions: The modified Ishihara colour test has turned out to be too difficult and therefore unreliable in the youngest children. For children under 5 years of age CVTME was more reliable in this study. For all ages the MRM test was the easiest to perform. Most children in this study subjectively preferred the MRM test.","PeriodicalId":49350,"journal":{"name":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"28 1","pages":"170-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which psychophysical colour vision test to use for screening in 3–9 year olds?\",\"authors\":\"M. Pompe, B. S. Kranjc\",\"doi\":\"10.6016/1021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To compare 4 psychophysical colour vision tests in children and to decide which test is most suitable for screening in pre-school and early school-age period. Methods: The first test used was a modified Ishihara plates test (Handaya Co. Ltd., Tokyo). The second test ”Colour vision testing made easy” (CVTME) (T. L. Waggoner, 1994) is also based on pseudoisochromatic plates with child-friendly symbols. The third test used was the ”Neitz test of colour vision” (WPS, 2001) and the fourth was ”Mollon-Reffin Minimalist test” (MRM) (version 0.7, 1994). In the first three tests, the child had to tell what he or she saw in the picture, whereas in the fourth test the child had to pick the coloured button among distractors. Thirty-seven children (19 girls and 18 boys) from 3–9 years of age with normal colour vision (at least one test should be performed without errors) were tested. The number of errors in each of the first 3 tests was registered, whereas in the MRM test the least saturated button distinguished among distractors was registered. Specificity was calculated for each test. Every child was also asked which was his or her favourite test. Results: 16/37 children made one or more errors in the modified Ishihara test, among them all children under the age of 5 years. Nine children made 1 error, three made 2, two made 3 and two children made 5 errors. 8/37 children made 1–3 mistakes in the CVTME test. Four children made one mistake, three made two and one child made three mistakes. All tested children made at least one mistake in the Neitz test. All gave a wrong description for the figure in the 6th position of the test. Two 3-year-old girls were not able to perform the test. The MRM test was not performed in full by 10/37 children. Most of these children made errors in the tritan colour vision axis. The highest specificity in all 3 age groups was calculated for CVTME test and MRM test. 28/37 children chose the MRM test as their favourite. Conclusions: The modified Ishihara colour test has turned out to be too difficult and therefore unreliable in the youngest children. For children under 5 years of age CVTME was more reliable in this study. For all ages the MRM test was the easiest to perform. Most children in this study subjectively preferred the MRM test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"170-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6016/1021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/1021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:比较4种儿童心理物理色觉测试,以确定哪种测试最适合在学龄前和学龄早期进行筛查。方法:采用改良石原板法(Handaya株式会社,东京)。第二个测试“颜色视觉测试变得容易”(T. L. Waggoner, 1994)也是基于带有儿童友好符号的假等色板。使用的第三个测试是“Neitz色视觉测试”(WPS, 2001),第四个是“Mollon-Reffin极简测试”(MRM)(版本0.7,1994)。在前三个测试中,孩子们必须说出他或她在图片中看到了什么,而在第四次测试中,孩子们必须在干扰物中选择彩色按钮。对37名3-9岁色视力正常的儿童(19名女孩和18名男孩)进行了测试(至少一次测试应无错误)。记录了前3个测试中每个测试的错误数,而在MRM测试中,记录了在干扰物中区分的最不饱和按钮。计算每个试验的特异性。每个孩子也被问到他或她最喜欢的测试是什么。结果:16/37的儿童在修改后的石原测验中出现一个或多个错误,其中均为5岁以下儿童。9个孩子犯了1个错误,3个犯了2个,2个犯了3个,2个犯了5个。8/37的孩子在CVTME测试中犯了1-3个错误。四个孩子犯了一个错误,三个孩子犯了两个错误,一个孩子犯了三个错误。所有参加测试的孩子在Neitz测试中至少犯了一个错误。对测试第6位的数字都给出了错误的描述两个3岁的女孩无法进行测试。10/37的儿童没有进行完整的MRM测试。这些孩子中的大多数在三色视觉轴上犯了错误。计算CVTME试验和MRM试验在所有3个年龄组中的最高特异性。28/37的孩子选择了MRM测试作为他们的最爱。结论:经过改进的石原颜色测试在最小的孩子身上太难了,因此不可靠。对于5岁以下的儿童,CVTME在本研究中更为可靠。对于所有年龄段的人来说,MRM测试是最容易进行的。在本研究中,大多数儿童主观上更喜欢MRM测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which psychophysical colour vision test to use for screening in 3–9 year olds?
Background: To compare 4 psychophysical colour vision tests in children and to decide which test is most suitable for screening in pre-school and early school-age period. Methods: The first test used was a modified Ishihara plates test (Handaya Co. Ltd., Tokyo). The second test ”Colour vision testing made easy” (CVTME) (T. L. Waggoner, 1994) is also based on pseudoisochromatic plates with child-friendly symbols. The third test used was the ”Neitz test of colour vision” (WPS, 2001) and the fourth was ”Mollon-Reffin Minimalist test” (MRM) (version 0.7, 1994). In the first three tests, the child had to tell what he or she saw in the picture, whereas in the fourth test the child had to pick the coloured button among distractors. Thirty-seven children (19 girls and 18 boys) from 3–9 years of age with normal colour vision (at least one test should be performed without errors) were tested. The number of errors in each of the first 3 tests was registered, whereas in the MRM test the least saturated button distinguished among distractors was registered. Specificity was calculated for each test. Every child was also asked which was his or her favourite test. Results: 16/37 children made one or more errors in the modified Ishihara test, among them all children under the age of 5 years. Nine children made 1 error, three made 2, two made 3 and two children made 5 errors. 8/37 children made 1–3 mistakes in the CVTME test. Four children made one mistake, three made two and one child made three mistakes. All tested children made at least one mistake in the Neitz test. All gave a wrong description for the figure in the 6th position of the test. Two 3-year-old girls were not able to perform the test. The MRM test was not performed in full by 10/37 children. Most of these children made errors in the tritan colour vision axis. The highest specificity in all 3 age groups was calculated for CVTME test and MRM test. 28/37 children chose the MRM test as their favourite. Conclusions: The modified Ishihara colour test has turned out to be too difficult and therefore unreliable in the youngest children. For children under 5 years of age CVTME was more reliable in this study. For all ages the MRM test was the easiest to perform. Most children in this study subjectively preferred the MRM test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信