老年患者口服镇痛药的使用和剂型:基于人群的研究

Antoni Sicras-Mainar , Salomé de Cambra-Florensa , Ruth Navarro-Artieda
{"title":"老年患者口服镇痛药的使用和剂型:基于人群的研究","authors":"Antoni Sicras-Mainar ,&nbsp;Salomé de Cambra-Florensa ,&nbsp;Ruth Navarro-Artieda","doi":"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70082-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of the study was to describe the consumption of oral analgesics (OA) in people aged ≥65 years, and distinguish between easy-to-swallow (ETS) formulations and solid forms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Real data study with a cross sectional design. Electronic anonymous medical records of one year of primary care activity (July 2007–June 2008) were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥65 years receiving OA. Subgroups: institutionalized/non institutionalized. It was considered the oral analgesics use as a principal variable. Study variables: socio-demographic, pharmaceutical formulations (solid and ETS), co morbidities, type of analgesics, geriatric scales (Minimental, Barthel), and poly-medication. Multiple logistic regression analysis models were applied. Program SPSSWIN, statistical signification <em>P</em>&lt;.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall 78% patients regularly consumed OA. A total of 11 344 patients were studied; mean age 75.1 (7) years; female 61.5%. Two percent of patients were institutionalized and were older (OR=1.2), predominantly female (OR=1.3), had more co morbidity (OR=3.5; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) and lower geriatric scale scores. OA were 13.8% of total drug consumption (95% CI, 13.2- 14.4); NSAIDs 69.5% and opioids 17.6%. Poly-medication 90.6% (96% institutionalized vs 90.5% non institutionalized; <em>P</em>=.019). Thirty-one point one percent of patients used ETS whose use was associated with stroke (OR=2.7), neuropathy (OR=2.4; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), and urinary incontinence. Institutionalized patients consumption of paracetamol, tramadol, and aceclofenac was higher (54.3%, 19%, and 7.6%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of OA was high, particularly in institutionalized patients. NSAIDs use was higher than expected compared to opioids that were lower than expected. The use of ETS analgesics was lower than expected given the reduced swallowing capacity of elderly patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100521,"journal":{"name":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 161-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70082-6","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumption of oral analgesics and dosage forms in elderly patients: population based study\",\"authors\":\"Antoni Sicras-Mainar ,&nbsp;Salomé de Cambra-Florensa ,&nbsp;Ruth Navarro-Artieda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70082-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of the study was to describe the consumption of oral analgesics (OA) in people aged ≥65 years, and distinguish between easy-to-swallow (ETS) formulations and solid forms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Real data study with a cross sectional design. Electronic anonymous medical records of one year of primary care activity (July 2007–June 2008) were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥65 years receiving OA. Subgroups: institutionalized/non institutionalized. It was considered the oral analgesics use as a principal variable. Study variables: socio-demographic, pharmaceutical formulations (solid and ETS), co morbidities, type of analgesics, geriatric scales (Minimental, Barthel), and poly-medication. Multiple logistic regression analysis models were applied. Program SPSSWIN, statistical signification <em>P</em>&lt;.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall 78% patients regularly consumed OA. A total of 11 344 patients were studied; mean age 75.1 (7) years; female 61.5%. Two percent of patients were institutionalized and were older (OR=1.2), predominantly female (OR=1.3), had more co morbidity (OR=3.5; <em>P</em>&lt;.001) and lower geriatric scale scores. OA were 13.8% of total drug consumption (95% CI, 13.2- 14.4); NSAIDs 69.5% and opioids 17.6%. Poly-medication 90.6% (96% institutionalized vs 90.5% non institutionalized; <em>P</em>=.019). Thirty-one point one percent of patients used ETS whose use was associated with stroke (OR=2.7), neuropathy (OR=2.4; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), and urinary incontinence. Institutionalized patients consumption of paracetamol, tramadol, and aceclofenac was higher (54.3%, 19%, and 7.6%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of OA was high, particularly in institutionalized patients. NSAIDs use was higher than expected compared to opioids that were lower than expected. The use of ETS analgesics was lower than expected given the reduced swallowing capacity of elderly patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 161-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2173-5085(09)70082-6\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173508509700826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究的目的是描述≥65岁人群口服镇痛药(OA)的消费情况,并区分易吞咽(ETS)制剂和固体制剂。方法采用横断面设计对真实资料进行研究。回顾性审查了一年初级保健活动(2007年7月- 2008年6月)的电子匿名医疗记录。纳入标准:年龄≥65岁的OA患者。分组:制度化/非制度化。口服镇痛药的使用被认为是一个主要变量。研究变量:社会人口统计学、药物配方(固体和ETS)、合并症、镇痛药类型、老年量表(Minimental, Barthel)和多种药物。采用多元logistic回归分析模型。程序SPSSWIN,统计学意义P< 0.05。结果78%的患者定期服用OA。共研究了11 344例患者;平均75.1(7)岁;女性61.5%。2%的患者住院,年龄较大(OR=1.2),主要是女性(OR=1.3),有更多的并发症(OR=3.5;P<.001)和较低的老年量表得分。OA占总药物消耗的13.8% (95% CI, 13.2 ~ 14.4);非甾体抗炎药69.5%,阿片类药物17.6%。综合用药90.6%(96%住院vs 90.5%非住院;P = .019)。31.1%使用ETS的患者与卒中(OR=2.7)、神经病变(OR=2.4;P<.001)和尿失禁。住院患者对扑热息痛、曲马多和乙酰氯芬酸的用量较高(分别为54.3%、19%和7.6%)。结论OA的使用率很高,特别是在住院患者中。非甾体抗炎药的使用高于预期,而阿片类药物的使用低于预期。考虑到老年患者吞咽能力下降,ETS镇痛药的使用低于预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consumption of oral analgesics and dosage forms in elderly patients: population based study

Objective

The objective of the study was to describe the consumption of oral analgesics (OA) in people aged ≥65 years, and distinguish between easy-to-swallow (ETS) formulations and solid forms.

Methods

Real data study with a cross sectional design. Electronic anonymous medical records of one year of primary care activity (July 2007–June 2008) were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria: patients aged ≥65 years receiving OA. Subgroups: institutionalized/non institutionalized. It was considered the oral analgesics use as a principal variable. Study variables: socio-demographic, pharmaceutical formulations (solid and ETS), co morbidities, type of analgesics, geriatric scales (Minimental, Barthel), and poly-medication. Multiple logistic regression analysis models were applied. Program SPSSWIN, statistical signification P<.05.

Results

Overall 78% patients regularly consumed OA. A total of 11 344 patients were studied; mean age 75.1 (7) years; female 61.5%. Two percent of patients were institutionalized and were older (OR=1.2), predominantly female (OR=1.3), had more co morbidity (OR=3.5; P<.001) and lower geriatric scale scores. OA were 13.8% of total drug consumption (95% CI, 13.2- 14.4); NSAIDs 69.5% and opioids 17.6%. Poly-medication 90.6% (96% institutionalized vs 90.5% non institutionalized; P=.019). Thirty-one point one percent of patients used ETS whose use was associated with stroke (OR=2.7), neuropathy (OR=2.4; P<.001), and urinary incontinence. Institutionalized patients consumption of paracetamol, tramadol, and aceclofenac was higher (54.3%, 19%, and 7.6%, respectively).

Conclusions

The use of OA was high, particularly in institutionalized patients. NSAIDs use was higher than expected compared to opioids that were lower than expected. The use of ETS analgesics was lower than expected given the reduced swallowing capacity of elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信