小儿脑肿瘤手术中术中磁共振成像的实用性:单个外科医生病例系列。

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
Journal of Cultural Geography Pub Date : 2019-08-23 Print Date: 2019-11-01 DOI:10.3171/2019.6.PEDS1998
Emily L Day, R Michael Scott
{"title":"小儿脑肿瘤手术中术中磁共振成像的实用性:单个外科医生病例系列。","authors":"Emily L Day, R Michael Scott","doi":"10.3171/2019.6.PEDS1998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to evaluate the utility of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) during brain tumor excision in pediatric patients and to suggest guidelines for its future use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent brain tumor surgery by the senior author at Boston Children's Hospital using ioMRI between 2005 and 2009 were included in this retrospective review of hospital records and the neurosurgeon's operative database. Prior to the review, the authors defined the utility of ioMRI into useful and not useful categories based on how the technology affected operative management. They determined that ioMRI was useful if it 1) effectively guided the extent of resection; 2) provided a baseline postoperative scan during the same anesthesia session; or 3) demonstrated or helped to prevent an intraoperative complication. The authors determined that ioMRI was not useful if 1) the anatomical location of the tumor had precluded a tumor's total resection, even though the surgeon had employed ioMRI for that purpose; 2) the tumor's imaging characteristics prevented an accurate assessment of resection during intraoperative imaging; 3) the surgeon deemed the technology not required for tumor resection; or 4) the intraoperative MR images were uninterpretable for technical reasons. Follow-up data provided another gauge of the long-term benefit of ioMRI to the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 brain tumor patients were operated on using ioMRI, 6 of whom had a second ioMRI procedure during the study period. Twenty-six patients were female, and 27 were male. The mean follow-up was 4.8 ± 3.85 years (range 0-12 years). By the criteria outlined above, ioMRI technology was useful in 38 (64.4%) of the 59 cases, most frequently for its help in assessing extent of resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative MRI technology was useful in the majority of brain tumor resections in this series, especially in those tumors that were contrast enhancing and located largely within accessible areas of the brain. The percentage of patients for whom ioMRI is useful could be increased by preoperatively evaluating the tumor's imaging characteristics to determine if ioMRI would accurately assess the extent of tumor resection, and by the surgeon's preoperative understanding that use of the ioMRI will not lead to resection of an anatomically unresectable tumor. The ioMRI can prove useful in unresectable tumors if specific operative goals are defined preoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":45137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Geography","volume":"4 1","pages":"577-583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of intraoperative MRI during pediatric brain tumor surgery: a single-surgeon case series.\",\"authors\":\"Emily L Day, R Michael Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2019.6.PEDS1998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to evaluate the utility of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) during brain tumor excision in pediatric patients and to suggest guidelines for its future use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent brain tumor surgery by the senior author at Boston Children's Hospital using ioMRI between 2005 and 2009 were included in this retrospective review of hospital records and the neurosurgeon's operative database. Prior to the review, the authors defined the utility of ioMRI into useful and not useful categories based on how the technology affected operative management. They determined that ioMRI was useful if it 1) effectively guided the extent of resection; 2) provided a baseline postoperative scan during the same anesthesia session; or 3) demonstrated or helped to prevent an intraoperative complication. The authors determined that ioMRI was not useful if 1) the anatomical location of the tumor had precluded a tumor's total resection, even though the surgeon had employed ioMRI for that purpose; 2) the tumor's imaging characteristics prevented an accurate assessment of resection during intraoperative imaging; 3) the surgeon deemed the technology not required for tumor resection; or 4) the intraoperative MR images were uninterpretable for technical reasons. Follow-up data provided another gauge of the long-term benefit of ioMRI to the patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 brain tumor patients were operated on using ioMRI, 6 of whom had a second ioMRI procedure during the study period. Twenty-six patients were female, and 27 were male. The mean follow-up was 4.8 ± 3.85 years (range 0-12 years). By the criteria outlined above, ioMRI technology was useful in 38 (64.4%) of the 59 cases, most frequently for its help in assessing extent of resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative MRI technology was useful in the majority of brain tumor resections in this series, especially in those tumors that were contrast enhancing and located largely within accessible areas of the brain. The percentage of patients for whom ioMRI is useful could be increased by preoperatively evaluating the tumor's imaging characteristics to determine if ioMRI would accurately assess the extent of tumor resection, and by the surgeon's preoperative understanding that use of the ioMRI will not lead to resection of an anatomically unresectable tumor. The ioMRI can prove useful in unresectable tumors if specific operative goals are defined preoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cultural Geography\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"577-583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cultural Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.6.PEDS1998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.6.PEDS1998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的作者试图评估术中磁共振成像(ioMRI)在儿科患者脑肿瘤切除术中的实用性,并为今后的使用提出指导建议:2005 年至 2009 年期间,波士顿儿童医院资深作者使用 ioMRI 对所有接受脑肿瘤手术的患者进行了回顾性审查,审查内容包括医院记录和神经外科医生的手术数据库。在进行回顾性研究之前,作者根据 ioMRI 技术对手术管理的影响程度,将 ioMRI 的效用分为有用和无用两类。他们认为,如果 ioMRI 能够:1)有效指导切除范围;2)在同一次麻醉过程中提供术后基线扫描;或 3)显示或帮助预防术中并发症,则说明 ioMRI 有用。作者认为 ioMRI 在以下情况下无用:1)肿瘤的解剖位置导致肿瘤无法完全切除,即使外科医生为此使用了 ioMRI;2)肿瘤的成像特征导致术中成像无法准确评估切除情况;3)外科医生认为肿瘤切除不需要该技术;或 4)术中 MR 图像因技术原因无法解读。随访数据从另一个角度衡量了 ioMRI 对患者的长期益处:共有 53 名脑肿瘤患者接受了 ioMRI 手术,其中 6 人在研究期间接受了第二次 ioMRI 手术。其中 26 名患者为女性,27 名患者为男性。平均随访时间为 4.8 ± 3.85 年(0-12 年不等)。根据上述标准,在 59 例患者中,38 例(64.4%)患者使用了 ioMRI 技术,最常见的原因是该技术有助于评估切除范围:结论:术中磁共振成像技术在本系列的大多数脑肿瘤切除术中都很有用,尤其是对那些造影剂增强且主要位于脑部可触及区域的肿瘤。通过术前评估肿瘤的成像特征,确定 ioMRI 是否能准确评估肿瘤切除范围,以及外科医生术前了解使用 ioMRI 不会导致切除解剖学上无法切除的肿瘤,可以提高 ioMRI 对患者有用的比例。如果术前确定了具体的手术目标,ioMRI 对无法切除的肿瘤可能会有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The utility of intraoperative MRI during pediatric brain tumor surgery: a single-surgeon case series.

Objective: The authors sought to evaluate the utility of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) during brain tumor excision in pediatric patients and to suggest guidelines for its future use.

Methods: All patients who underwent brain tumor surgery by the senior author at Boston Children's Hospital using ioMRI between 2005 and 2009 were included in this retrospective review of hospital records and the neurosurgeon's operative database. Prior to the review, the authors defined the utility of ioMRI into useful and not useful categories based on how the technology affected operative management. They determined that ioMRI was useful if it 1) effectively guided the extent of resection; 2) provided a baseline postoperative scan during the same anesthesia session; or 3) demonstrated or helped to prevent an intraoperative complication. The authors determined that ioMRI was not useful if 1) the anatomical location of the tumor had precluded a tumor's total resection, even though the surgeon had employed ioMRI for that purpose; 2) the tumor's imaging characteristics prevented an accurate assessment of resection during intraoperative imaging; 3) the surgeon deemed the technology not required for tumor resection; or 4) the intraoperative MR images were uninterpretable for technical reasons. Follow-up data provided another gauge of the long-term benefit of ioMRI to the patient.

Results: A total of 53 brain tumor patients were operated on using ioMRI, 6 of whom had a second ioMRI procedure during the study period. Twenty-six patients were female, and 27 were male. The mean follow-up was 4.8 ± 3.85 years (range 0-12 years). By the criteria outlined above, ioMRI technology was useful in 38 (64.4%) of the 59 cases, most frequently for its help in assessing extent of resection.

Conclusions: Intraoperative MRI technology was useful in the majority of brain tumor resections in this series, especially in those tumors that were contrast enhancing and located largely within accessible areas of the brain. The percentage of patients for whom ioMRI is useful could be increased by preoperatively evaluating the tumor's imaging characteristics to determine if ioMRI would accurately assess the extent of tumor resection, and by the surgeon's preoperative understanding that use of the ioMRI will not lead to resection of an anatomically unresectable tumor. The ioMRI can prove useful in unresectable tumors if specific operative goals are defined preoperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Since 1979 this lively journal has provided an international forum for scholarly research devoted to the spatial aspects of human groups, their activities, associated landscapes, and other cultural phenomena. The journal features high quality articles that are written in an accessible style. With a suite of full-length research articles, interpretive essays, special thematic issues devoted to major topics of interest, and book reviews, the Journal of Cultural Geography remains an indispensable resource both within and beyond the academic community. The journal"s audience includes the well-read general public and specialists from geography, ethnic studies, history, historic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信