COVID-19 大流行期间的社会疏远和相关因素与 COVID-19 症状和诊断以及心理健康的关系。

Q3 Medicine
Ruth Dickey-Chasins, Katelyn F Romm, Amita N Vyas, Karen McDonnell, Yan Wang, Yan Ma, Carla J Berg
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间的社会疏远和相关因素与 COVID-19 症状和诊断以及心理健康的关系。","authors":"Ruth Dickey-Chasins, Katelyn F Romm, Amita N Vyas, Karen McDonnell, Yan Wang, Yan Ma, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.1007/s10389-022-01722-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many states, local authorities, organizations, and individuals have taken action to reduce the spread of COVID-19, particularly focused on restricting social interactions. Such actions have raised controversy regarding their implications for the spread of COVID-19 versus mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined correlates of: (1) COVID symptoms and test results (i.e., no symptoms/tested negative, symptoms but not tested, tested positive), and (2) mental health symptoms (depressive/anxiety symptoms, COVID-related stress). Data were drawn from Fall 2020 surveys of young adults (n = 2576; <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 24.67; 55.8% female; 31.0% sexual minority; 5.4% Black; 12.7% Asian; 11.1% Hispanic) in six metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with distinct COVID-related state orders. Correlates of interest included MSA, social distancing behaviors, employment status/nature, household composition, and political orientation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3.0% tested positive for COVID-19; 7.0% had symptoms but no test; 29.1% reported at least moderate depressive/anxiety symptoms on the PHQ-4 Questionnaire. Correlates of testing positive (vs. having no symptoms) included residing in Oklahoma City vs. Boston, San Diego, or Seattle and less social distancing adherence; there were few differences between those without symptoms/negative test and those with symptoms but not tested. Correlates of greater depressive/anxiety symptoms included greater social distancing adherence, being unemployed/laid off (vs. working outside of the home), living with others (other than partners/children), and being Democrat but not Republican (vs. no lean); findings related to COVID-specific stress were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite curbing the pandemic, social distancing and individual (e.g., political) and environmental factors that restrict social interaction have negative implications for mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23839,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social distancing and related factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to COVID-19 symptoms and diagnosis and mental health.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Dickey-Chasins, Katelyn F Romm, Amita N Vyas, Karen McDonnell, Yan Wang, Yan Ma, Carla J Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10389-022-01722-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many states, local authorities, organizations, and individuals have taken action to reduce the spread of COVID-19, particularly focused on restricting social interactions. Such actions have raised controversy regarding their implications for the spread of COVID-19 versus mental health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined correlates of: (1) COVID symptoms and test results (i.e., no symptoms/tested negative, symptoms but not tested, tested positive), and (2) mental health symptoms (depressive/anxiety symptoms, COVID-related stress). Data were drawn from Fall 2020 surveys of young adults (n = 2576; <i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 24.67; 55.8% female; 31.0% sexual minority; 5.4% Black; 12.7% Asian; 11.1% Hispanic) in six metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with distinct COVID-related state orders. Correlates of interest included MSA, social distancing behaviors, employment status/nature, household composition, and political orientation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 3.0% tested positive for COVID-19; 7.0% had symptoms but no test; 29.1% reported at least moderate depressive/anxiety symptoms on the PHQ-4 Questionnaire. Correlates of testing positive (vs. having no symptoms) included residing in Oklahoma City vs. Boston, San Diego, or Seattle and less social distancing adherence; there were few differences between those without symptoms/negative test and those with symptoms but not tested. Correlates of greater depressive/anxiety symptoms included greater social distancing adherence, being unemployed/laid off (vs. working outside of the home), living with others (other than partners/children), and being Democrat but not Republican (vs. no lean); findings related to COVID-specific stress were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite curbing the pandemic, social distancing and individual (e.g., political) and environmental factors that restrict social interaction have negative implications for mental health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173837/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01722-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01722-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多州、地方当局、组织和个人都已采取行动来减少 COVID-19 的传播,尤其注重限制社会交往。这些行动对 COVID-19 的传播和心理健康的影响引起了争议:我们研究了以下方面的相关因素(1) COVID 症状和测试结果(即无症状/测试结果为阴性、有症状但未测试、测试结果为阳性),以及 (2) 心理健康症状(抑郁/焦虑症状、COVID 相关压力)。数据来自 2020 年秋季对六个大都会统计区(MSA)的年轻成年人(n = 2576;M 年龄 = 24.67;55.8% 为女性;31.0% 为性少数群体;5.4% 为黑人;12.7% 为亚裔;11.1% 为西班牙裔)进行的调查,这六个大都会统计区的 COVID 相关州令各不相同。相关因素包括大都会统计区、社会疏远行为、就业状况/性质、家庭构成和政治倾向:总体而言,3.0% 的人 COVID-19 检测呈阳性;7.0% 的人有症状但未检测;29.1% 的人在 PHQ-4 问卷上报告了至少中度抑郁/焦虑症状。检测结果呈阳性(与无症状相比)的相关因素包括居住在俄克拉荷马市与波士顿、圣地亚哥或西雅图之间的差异,以及较少的社会距离依从性;无症状/检测结果呈阴性者与有症状但未检测者之间的差异很小。更多抑郁/焦虑症状的相关因素包括:更多坚持社会疏远、失业/被解雇(与在外工作相比)、与他人同住(伴侣/子女除外)、是民主党人而非共和党人(与无党派人士相比);与 COVID 特定压力相关的研究结果相似:结论:尽管大流行病已经得到遏制,但社会疏远以及限制社会交往的个人(如政治)和环境因素会对心理健康产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social distancing and related factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in relation to COVID-19 symptoms and diagnosis and mental health.

Background: Many states, local authorities, organizations, and individuals have taken action to reduce the spread of COVID-19, particularly focused on restricting social interactions. Such actions have raised controversy regarding their implications for the spread of COVID-19 versus mental health.

Methods: We examined correlates of: (1) COVID symptoms and test results (i.e., no symptoms/tested negative, symptoms but not tested, tested positive), and (2) mental health symptoms (depressive/anxiety symptoms, COVID-related stress). Data were drawn from Fall 2020 surveys of young adults (n = 2576; M age = 24.67; 55.8% female; 31.0% sexual minority; 5.4% Black; 12.7% Asian; 11.1% Hispanic) in six metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with distinct COVID-related state orders. Correlates of interest included MSA, social distancing behaviors, employment status/nature, household composition, and political orientation.

Results: Overall, 3.0% tested positive for COVID-19; 7.0% had symptoms but no test; 29.1% reported at least moderate depressive/anxiety symptoms on the PHQ-4 Questionnaire. Correlates of testing positive (vs. having no symptoms) included residing in Oklahoma City vs. Boston, San Diego, or Seattle and less social distancing adherence; there were few differences between those without symptoms/negative test and those with symptoms but not tested. Correlates of greater depressive/anxiety symptoms included greater social distancing adherence, being unemployed/laid off (vs. working outside of the home), living with others (other than partners/children), and being Democrat but not Republican (vs. no lean); findings related to COVID-specific stress were similar.

Conclusion: Despite curbing the pandemic, social distancing and individual (e.g., political) and environmental factors that restrict social interaction have negative implications for mental health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften
Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信