在Covid-19时期,银行风险偏好与银行违约相关吗?

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Pei-Ling Lee , Chun-Teck Lye , Chin Lee
{"title":"在Covid-19时期,银行风险偏好与银行违约相关吗?","authors":"Pei-Ling Lee ,&nbsp;Chun-Teck Lye ,&nbsp;Chin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.cbrev.2022.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper aims to analyze the effect of bank risk appetite on banks' default probabilities during the year of COVID-19 in 12 countries while controlling for bank-specific and country-specific effects over time. A System Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) model of default probabilities is estimated over the periods 2010–2021. This study confirms the ‘risk-mitigation view’, in which banks with higher ESG scores are more prudent in lending and have better relationship management, reducing the probability of bank default. Underperforming banks tend to have a higher portion of risky loans in their credit portfolio and therefore demonstrating a higher default propensity. Bank risk appetite, ESG, asset quality, economic growth, and currency depreciation appear to be material drivers for bank risk. We find that a lower risk appetite ratio (corresponding to higher risk appetite) is associated with higher estimated default probability during the COVID-19 outbreak, identified through interaction with a single time dummy for 2020 (the break-out year of the pandemic).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43998,"journal":{"name":"Central Bank Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S130307012200021X/pdfft?md5=fd9aefad9cf254a310e737de7018a2b4&pid=1-s2.0-S130307012200021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is bank risk appetite relevant to bank default in times of Covid-19?\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Ling Lee ,&nbsp;Chun-Teck Lye ,&nbsp;Chin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cbrev.2022.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The paper aims to analyze the effect of bank risk appetite on banks' default probabilities during the year of COVID-19 in 12 countries while controlling for bank-specific and country-specific effects over time. A System Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) model of default probabilities is estimated over the periods 2010–2021. This study confirms the ‘risk-mitigation view’, in which banks with higher ESG scores are more prudent in lending and have better relationship management, reducing the probability of bank default. Underperforming banks tend to have a higher portion of risky loans in their credit portfolio and therefore demonstrating a higher default propensity. Bank risk appetite, ESG, asset quality, economic growth, and currency depreciation appear to be material drivers for bank risk. We find that a lower risk appetite ratio (corresponding to higher risk appetite) is associated with higher estimated default probability during the COVID-19 outbreak, identified through interaction with a single time dummy for 2020 (the break-out year of the pandemic).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Bank Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S130307012200021X/pdfft?md5=fd9aefad9cf254a310e737de7018a2b4&pid=1-s2.0-S130307012200021X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Bank Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S130307012200021X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Bank Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S130307012200021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文旨在分析12个国家的银行风险偏好对2019冠状病毒病疫情期间银行违约概率的影响,同时控制银行特有和国家特有的长期影响。在2010-2021年期间估计了违约概率的系统广义矩量方法(GMM)模型。这项研究证实了“风险缓解观点”,即ESG得分较高的银行在贷款方面更谨慎,关系管理也更好,从而降低了银行违约的可能性。表现不佳的银行往往在其信贷组合中拥有更高比例的风险贷款,因此表现出更高的违约倾向。银行风险偏好、ESG、资产质量、经济增长和货币贬值似乎是银行风险的主要驱动因素。我们发现,在2019冠状病毒病爆发期间,较低的风险偏好比率(对应于较高的风险偏好)与较高的估计违约概率相关,这是通过与2020年(大流行爆发年)的单一时间假人互动确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is bank risk appetite relevant to bank default in times of Covid-19?

The paper aims to analyze the effect of bank risk appetite on banks' default probabilities during the year of COVID-19 in 12 countries while controlling for bank-specific and country-specific effects over time. A System Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) model of default probabilities is estimated over the periods 2010–2021. This study confirms the ‘risk-mitigation view’, in which banks with higher ESG scores are more prudent in lending and have better relationship management, reducing the probability of bank default. Underperforming banks tend to have a higher portion of risky loans in their credit portfolio and therefore demonstrating a higher default propensity. Bank risk appetite, ESG, asset quality, economic growth, and currency depreciation appear to be material drivers for bank risk. We find that a lower risk appetite ratio (corresponding to higher risk appetite) is associated with higher estimated default probability during the COVID-19 outbreak, identified through interaction with a single time dummy for 2020 (the break-out year of the pandemic).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central Bank Review
Central Bank Review ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信