严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA 疫苗在全国高危人群中 3 剂与 2 剂的接种效果。

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
Adeel A Butt, Victor B Talisa, Peng Yan, Obaid S Shaikh, Saad B Omer, Florian B Mayr
{"title":"严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA 疫苗在全国高危人群中 3 剂与 2 剂的接种效果。","authors":"Adeel A Butt, Victor B Talisa, Peng Yan, Obaid S Shaikh, Saad B Omer, Florian B Mayr","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciac178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a third or booster vaccine dose in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or its consequences is critical in developing recommendations for their use. We determined relative VE of 3 vs 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and severe/critical disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among veterans who had received 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine by 30 April 2021, we identified those who received a third dose of the same vaccine between 22 September and 24 November 2021 and 1:1 matched controls who had not received their third dose by then. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we calculated adjusted hazards ratios for symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death after SARS-CoV-2-positive test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 321 366 veterans who received 2 doses of Pfizer BNT-162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine by 30 April 2021, we matched 395 686 persons who received a third dose of the same vaccine between 22 September and 24 November 2021 to controls who did not receive a third dose. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) were .15 (.11-.21) for symptomatic infection and .18 (.13-.26) for hospitalizations for 3 vs 2 doses, corresponding to relative VE of 85% and 82%. Five ICU admissions or deaths were observed (4 among recipients of 2 doses). There was no difference in VE between BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine is associated with high VE against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and critical disease in the pre-Omicron era.</p>","PeriodicalId":14597,"journal":{"name":"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"e579-e584"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903438/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccine Effectiveness of 3 Versus 2 Doses of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA Vaccines in a High-Risk National Population.\",\"authors\":\"Adeel A Butt, Victor B Talisa, Peng Yan, Obaid S Shaikh, Saad B Omer, Florian B Mayr\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cid/ciac178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Knowledge of the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a third or booster vaccine dose in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or its consequences is critical in developing recommendations for their use. We determined relative VE of 3 vs 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and severe/critical disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among veterans who had received 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine by 30 April 2021, we identified those who received a third dose of the same vaccine between 22 September and 24 November 2021 and 1:1 matched controls who had not received their third dose by then. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we calculated adjusted hazards ratios for symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death after SARS-CoV-2-positive test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 321 366 veterans who received 2 doses of Pfizer BNT-162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine by 30 April 2021, we matched 395 686 persons who received a third dose of the same vaccine between 22 September and 24 November 2021 to controls who did not receive a third dose. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) were .15 (.11-.21) for symptomatic infection and .18 (.13-.26) for hospitalizations for 3 vs 2 doses, corresponding to relative VE of 85% and 82%. Five ICU admissions or deaths were observed (4 among recipients of 2 doses). There was no difference in VE between BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine is associated with high VE against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and critical disease in the pre-Omicron era.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"e579-e584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:了解第三剂或加强剂疫苗在预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染或其后果方面的疫苗有效性 (VE) 对于制定疫苗使用建议至关重要。我们确定了 3 剂与 2 剂 mRNA 疫苗在预防无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染、住院和严重/危重疾病方面的相对 VE:在 2021 年 4 月 30 日前接种过 2 剂 mRNA 疫苗的退伍军人中,我们确定了在 2021 年 9 月 22 日至 11 月 24 日期间接种过第三剂相同疫苗的退伍军人,以及当时尚未接种第三剂疫苗的 1:1 匹配对照组。我们使用 Cox 比例危险度模型计算了 SARS-CoV-2 阳性检测后无症状感染、住院、入住重症监护室或死亡的调整危险度比:在 2021 年 4 月 30 日前接种过两剂辉瑞 BNT-162b2 或 Moderna mRNA-1273 疫苗的 2 321 366 名退伍军人中,我们将 2021 年 9 月 22 日至 11 月 24 日期间接种过第三剂相同疫苗的 395 686 人与未接种第三剂疫苗的对照组进行了配对。接种 3 剂疫苗与接种 2 剂疫苗相比,有症状感染的调整 HR 值(95% CI)为 0.15(0.11-0.21),住院治疗的调整 HR 值为 0.18(0.13-0.26),相对 VE 值分别为 85% 和 82%。观察到 5 例入住重症监护室或死亡病例(其中 4 例为 2 次用药)。BNT162b2 与 mRNA-1273 受试者的 VE 没有差异:结论:在前 Omicron 时代,SARS-CoV-2 mRNA 第三剂疫苗对无症状感染、住院和危重症的有效率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vaccine Effectiveness of 3 Versus 2 Doses of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA Vaccines in a High-Risk National Population.

Background: Knowledge of the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of a third or booster vaccine dose in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or its consequences is critical in developing recommendations for their use. We determined relative VE of 3 vs 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and severe/critical disease.

Methods: Among veterans who had received 2 doses of an mRNA vaccine by 30 April 2021, we identified those who received a third dose of the same vaccine between 22 September and 24 November 2021 and 1:1 matched controls who had not received their third dose by then. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we calculated adjusted hazards ratios for symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death after SARS-CoV-2-positive test.

Results: Among 2 321 366 veterans who received 2 doses of Pfizer BNT-162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine by 30 April 2021, we matched 395 686 persons who received a third dose of the same vaccine between 22 September and 24 November 2021 to controls who did not receive a third dose. Adjusted HRs (95% CI) were .15 (.11-.21) for symptomatic infection and .18 (.13-.26) for hospitalizations for 3 vs 2 doses, corresponding to relative VE of 85% and 82%. Five ICU admissions or deaths were observed (4 among recipients of 2 doses). There was no difference in VE between BNT162b2 versus mRNA-1273 recipients.

Conclusions: A third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine is associated with high VE against symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and critical disease in the pre-Omicron era.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies provides a unique platform for stable isotope studies in geological and life sciences, with emphasis on ecology. The international journal publishes original research papers, review articles, short communications, and book reviews relating to the following topics: -variations in natural isotope abundance (isotope ecology, isotope biochemistry, isotope hydrology, isotope geology) -stable isotope tracer techniques to follow the fate of certain substances in soil, water, plants, animals and in the human body -isotope effects and tracer theory linked with mathematical modelling -isotope measurement methods and equipment with respect to environmental and health research -diagnostic stable isotope application in medicine and in health studies -environmental sources of ionizing radiation and its effects on all living matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信